User talk:Rhshovon

Peace TV Bangla
Hello. You do not appear familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In particular, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. Best regards, George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 10:42, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

London Hammer
Hi, there's a policy here that sources need to meet WP:RS. In this case, the idea "remarkable claims require remarkable sources" would apply. Specifically, you cited a website that itself cited 'some archaeologists' as having done the dating work, but that site didn't give any further detail. Which archaeologists? Where did they publish their findings? Do those archaeologists themselves meet WP:RS? Now I would still find such claims unbelievable, but we might be able to include them if phrased appropriately, such as "A team from Foobar U. dated the surrounding matrix with the Wet Finger In The Air technique and gave an estimate of 400 MY", but only if we have a source for them. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:49, 18 December 2023 (UTC)