User talk:Rhullock

Liberally applying the NPOV tag to articles like you did to Seventh-day Adventist Church does not improve wikipedia. It actually does very little at all. If you are to apply a tag such as you did, you need to explain why on the articles talk page. MyNameIsNotBob 20:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

I agree completely. Wanted to see how long it took someone to edit out my completely unfair NPOV. I am getting tired of the NPOV's against my page entry Transtheism and am considering removing the entry due to arrogance and religious bigotry of editors. I think I know how the Muslim page editors must feel.

Papsis
Some of the people, places or things you have written about may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable, with reference to reliable published sources. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. Friday (talk) 22:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Renaissance games online
A tag has been placed on Renaissance games online, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Renaissance games online. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. janejellyroll 04:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Ammatar Alliance Recruiting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Onorem♠Dil 12:39, 3 September 2007 (UTC)