User talk:Rhurst3

April 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Batabano has been reverted. Your edit here to Batabano was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/pg/rebadilbertcreations/about/?ref=page_internal) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:23, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of If Trash Could Talk for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article If Trash Could Talk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/If Trash Could Talk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:14, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

How can I make this page more suitable for Wikipedia? (Rhurst3 (talk) 15:36, 3 July 2018 (UTC))


 * You can't. The topic itself is not suitable for Wikipedia. I would highly recommend adding the information in the article to a new section of Jacquelyn Ottman instead. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

This page is for a published book, plenty of pages exist for other books, and I modeled my page after them. (Rhurst3 (talk) 15:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC))

Hey Rhurst, just to let you know about the rules of articles you've created and how you address them seeing how you said "modeled my page", in short please have a look at WP:OWN! HC7 (talk) 15:50, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

I would appreciate it if you didn't go on a vandalism spree just because you don't have a full understanding of Notability (books). If you read this page, you will understand why the topic is being proposed for deletion. Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Olivia Catherine McGovern Hurst


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Olivia Catherine McGovern Hurst, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HC7 (talk) 15:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with If Trash Could Talk. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:49, 3 July 2018 (UTC)