User talk:RhymeWrens



Hello, RhymeWrens, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode


 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 16:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you.
Hello. Thank you so much for your kind gesture of the barnstar. My first one! It made me smile and made my night. I’m very glad to see other concerned, skeptical Wikipedians and I very much appreciate your thoughtful recognition.  ← 𝐋𝐞𝐟𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧  03:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amorality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Humanity. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Ways to improve Tuckamore Youth Treatment Centre
Hello, RhymeWrens,

Thank you for creating Tuckamore Youth Treatment Centre.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Both of the references are from the heal services or government themselves, and are routine listings of services. It would be really helpful to have additional reference from independent reliable sources that discuss the centre."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Klbrain (talk) 10:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi Klbrain and thanks for your suggestions, they helped me understand Wikipedia's notability policies as a beginner editor. I had initially felt that an article for this would be "notable" or important because it is one of the only mental health-focused treatment centres in Newfoundland and Labrador, but I clearly realize now what is required from Wikipedia's notability standards.
 * I have added citations to news articles that discuss the centre, as well as to an excerpt of a book which lists the available mental health and addictions rehabilitation facilities in Newfoundland and Labrador. I do hope, from my beginner understanding of the standards for sources, that these are considered reliable and independent secondary sources. Please check these new changes at your convenience and let me know if/when it is okay to remove the tag, thanks.
 * RhymeWrens (talk) 04:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * RhymeWrens (talk) 04:35, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

GA reviewing
Hi there, I noticed your GAR for Maia arson crimew. It looks like you've got a pretty good handle on the GA criteria. (It's hardly your fault you're not familiar with the ancient articles GAR is intended for triaging.) If you're interested in doing some reviews of your own, there's a newbie-focused backlog drive going on next month: Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/July 2024. We'd love to have you! -- asilvering (talk) 01:53, 26 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the suggestion! I will definitely be participating in the drive, I had no idea that was going on and I'm actually quite interested in GA reviewing and helping with getting articles assessed so thanks for letting me know. RhymeWrens (talk) 03:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics.

— Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 23:16, 13 July 2024 (UTC)