User talk:Riane97/sandbox

Travis's Peer Review: Your article looks good. The content itself reads well and without any bias. References and citations need to be added to the article. Lastly, the article needs to be formatted and divided into sections. Your article is coming along well.

Peer Review
Hi!

Your article is starting to look great! Intro is off to a good start. I really liked your explanation of the Free School Act, I would suggest expanding on the Tax Anything Law and provide more examples of it. I think once you get your headings and sources posted it will look more like the completed article. I am going on campus to work on my article and get it formatted corrected on Monday because I am in the same boat. I would change "promise of helping PA's" to "promise of helping Pennsylvania's", and make sure to capitalize Democrat and Republican. Another positive is that your article doesn't seem biased.

Good luck! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurendunegan (talk • contribs) 19:38, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Janelle's Peer Review
The information is great and helps the reader understand these policies. The criticism that I would give is more examples and a brief sentence or two in each paragraph to explain how the change effected PA. The first paragraph is framed wonderfully (Info, example, impact, change). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay.Darbs (talk • contribs) 14:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)