User talk:Riaz712

June 2009
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 00:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Material about living people that is neither backed up by citations nor verifiable is always potentially libellous. Wikipedia operates a policy of all material concerning living people ALWAYS being verifiable before inclusion into an article. Please do not restore material deleted on the ground of potentially inciting libel without sufficient citations to confirm the claims.

Sigma714 (talk) 20:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

It looks to me that voxpopulist has supplied the citations you are asking for Riaz712 (talk) 19:48, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

You are a complete liar who launches personal attacks. Such behaviour is not welcome in Wikipedia.

Sigma714 (talk) 21:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Mind your manners. Riaz712 (talk) 21:20, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

"The overriding fact being that Sobrany was expelled from Dissident Congress by the membership on 15th November 2008 and is no longer a member of any Dissident Congress; which is what the main article has been at pains to point out".

I hope you are aware that this statement is libel.

Mitcheldean (talk) 08:00, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dissident Congress / Populist Party (UK)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Dissident Congress / Populist Party (UK). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Dissident Congress / Populist Party (UK). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 27 November 2009 (UTC)