User talk:Ribbon Salminen/Archive 5

WP:FOUR
Greetings, Ribbon Salminen. I intend on pursuing the Four Award, requiring an editor to guide an article through creation, Do You Know, Good and Featured Article. I see that you have created many New Japan PPV articles. Would you be interested in collaborating for a shot at WP:FOUR for Wrestle Kingdom 9? It would require you to be active during all four stages, creation, DYK, GA and FA. I will be, because I'm interested, and I'm planning on the majority of the article being written before August 2015. Honestly, if you're not interested, I could totally go at it alone too, I've done so for NXT Arrival, but I'd like to hear your answer before I do anything. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé !  05:17, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Awesome. Would you be free within the next seven days? If so, I'll go ahead and create the article, then we need to get it DYK-ready during that time period. But perhaps not make it too long, because it's only DYK first. Your thoughts? I've also found a lot of mainstream sources, but need help on Japanese ones. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé !  03:11, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, so one of us is going to have to create the page, since we can't possibly do it together. I've done it, and now I'm letting you make the second (and more) edit. I'm going to use a Paste Magazine source to add information. You can continue adding information from that source, or you can use others like or . I'll put a full list of mainstream sources on the talk page after you've put your edit in. You can also create the talk page for the article. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé !  04:24, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Yup great work on that. I'm thinking we should keep the article short first for DYK. We could probably skip the storylines section and the aftermath section. Instead, focus on the background section, from the mainstream sources I've put on the talk page? starship.paint ~ ¡Olé !  08:10, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Wow, the article is long enough for DYK already. We could insert a hook and be good to go. Personally, I was thinking of a hook with Jim Ross' first post-WWE commentary, which needs a source. However I'll be glad to hear any ideas of yours for DYK hooks. I'll have to go get a DYK QPQ done though.
 * About the article expansion tag, is it needed? Honestly I don't want to expand the article too much until a DYK review has started. I'm a bit afraid a too-long article will scare away DYK reviewers. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé !  10:09, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Nice work. I'm just going to create a Reception section with the bare minimum of content for the general vibe of the show. We still have to split the DYK somehow. Here's my idea. You nominate the article for DYK, but I'll provide the QPQ component. Then we both try to answer the reviewer. Hopefully there are enough queries from the reviewer to split in half. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé !  01:17, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * QPQ means that if you want to nominate a DYK but have already gained 5 DYK credits (both of us have) then you will have to review someone else's DYK as quid pro quo starship.paint ~ ¡Olé !  01:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you could explicitly write that this is a joint-DYK nomination. I suppose it's possible for you to nominate, but for me to provide the QPQ review. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé !  04:35, 10 May 2015 (UTC)


 * DYK nom done, QPQ also. Actually, you won't get "shot down instantly" if your QPQ isn't there, so you can always nominate first and review someone else's article later. Please feel free to propose an alternative hook. ... that ...  starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  12:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * We might have done too well a job. Quick, sneak in a comment at Template:Did you know nominations/Wrestle Kingdom 9! starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  01:55, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Nice. Sorry about forgetting "professional". Now, can I ask, is there a source stating "Meiyu Tag"? I don't see it in the official NJPW result, the Observer result or the Torch result. starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  05:55, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I added PWInsider as a source. The article will probably be featured from 28 May 07:00 (UTC) to 29 May 07:00 (UTC). After 29 May 07:00, we can continue expanding the article. I will probably be focusing on the Reception section first, at that time. starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  03:00, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * After DYK, I think we can go all in on the article before the Good Article nomination, I don't see the point of delaying. Then after GA promotion immediately nominate for Featured Article. By going all in, eventually the only changes we need to make is to answer the reviewers. As for the article, I'll pick up the Event section as well, which was left over. starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  07:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * So the DYK is live, and will be down in at most 12 hours, upon which we can start again! starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  01:11, 27 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Okay, so my comments about the Storylines; it's just too long. The current length of the section is about 2.5 pages. My MITB 2011 FA is about 1.5 pages. ER12 GA is about 1.5 pages. WMXXX GA is about 2 pages. NXTA GA is about 1 page.
 * One way to trim the section down is to take away some matches. WMXXX actually only covered the storylines of four matches, the biggest ones. Similarly, WillC's FA, Turning Point (2008 wrestling), only covered the storylines of four out of eight matches.
 * I was thinking of cutting all the non-title matches, actually. Since most of the title matches didn't have much storylines to it, I'd just focus on how the challengers earned the title shot, and how long the champion has held the title. Just like to hear your thoughts before I start cutting and adding. starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  13:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, I rolled with your inclinations and nuked most of the title matches. The section's now almost 2 pages, which is passable, I guess. starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  12:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Ribbon, I'm actually done with the first writing of the Event and Reception sections. Any comments? Also, I have to mention that I'm holidaying soon for two weeks and will only be back near the end of the month. starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  05:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, I removed the move name since the source didn't catch it. I do think you can add Koslov's stuff, the Aftermath section can accommodate it. You're also missing Nakamura's aftermath. starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  05:50, 5 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Ribbon, I'm back on-site. Would you like me to start the GA nomination, or would you like to try it yourself? starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  05:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Indeed we can only hope. starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  10:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wrestle Kingdom 9
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wrestle Kingdom 9 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 08:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * This was much faster than I expected! starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  04:38, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wrestle Kingdom 9
The article Wrestle Kingdom 9 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wrestle Kingdom 9 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 10:21, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for leaving me some queries to address! BTW, any idea on the buyrate in Japan? starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  10:44, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay. WWE is more public, it seems. But there was something online about the Observer reporting 2,500 for Flipps alone, which crashed the app? starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  10:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for looking through. We can say there's 20,000 World-ers on 1/21, that's the key info, to me it means the maximum people who could have watched it through World. starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  13:21, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
 * OK I added it. Nice job! One more stage to go! starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  01:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you read Featured article candidates, I think our next step should be Peer review. starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  02:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I've nominated the article for peer review. We might be able to get more comments by commenting on other peer reviews. If you do have the time. It's not very pressing in terms of time because the peer review might take weeks. starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  07:45, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Ribbon, I just thought of maybe including Japanese reviews of the event. Are there any other major publications other than Tokyo Sports? TS gave several matches individual articles, but didn't actually review the event. Kayfabe lives! starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  06:39, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * At least I'll be able to answer anyone who would question the lack of Japanese reviews - all the websites have "sport" in their name - sports events aren't typically reviewed by critics. starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  11:37, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Ribbon, I've restored the Ibushi match to the storyline section because it was a main event according to NJPW. However, the PWInsider source doesn't exactly say Ibushi gained weight and left the junior heavyweight division. Could you find another source for that? starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  13:21, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I've trimmed it, and reworded / explained some other stuff that you wrote. Feel free to do the same for my writings. Should we mention Ibushi's loss to Styles? starship.paint <font color="#000000">~ ¡<font color="#E62617">Olé !  03:06, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * My answer is YES! I added four (Nakamura, Tanahashi, Ross, Striker), and we can have even more! What do you think about Jarrett in Background, Honma at the top of Storylines, and perhaps Suzuki at the bottom of Aftermath? starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  11:55, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I can't do the rest of the pictures today, if you can't either, I'll do it tomorrow. I'm still pondering if and where Ibushi should go as well. starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  13:40, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for including the pictures. I switched Ibushi for Suzuki, after considering that Ibushi appears in the lede. starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  06:18, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wrestle Kingdom 9
The article Wrestle Kingdom 9 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wrestle Kingdom 9 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 14:01, 5 July 2015 (UTC) - Hi Ribbon, my exams are over for now. Would you be okay for the 2nd FAC nom of MITB 2011 ASAP? starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  08:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Ribbon, I was thinking of nominating WK9 as an FAC around August 6-9. We have had a decent amount of comments for the peer review already. Are you okay with that date for the FAC, which will probably run until late August? starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  11:33, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree with you on the Storylines. Other peer reviewers didn't find a problem with length. Apologies, my extended holiday has led to this PR stretching. Once WillC approves, I'll close it for the FAC. starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  01:27, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm going to close the PR and start the FAC soon, you approve, Ribbon? starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  11:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi Ribbon, unluckily for us the FAC really hasn't picked up steam. If it fails, would you be patient enough to wait until December (my holidays) when I will have more time and inclination to review other FACs for quid pro quo? starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  01:39, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for understanding, Ribbon. starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  09:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh man, Ribbon. When F4Wonline updated their website, and I think a lot, a lot of links were broken in the process. At least from Google search results. starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  07:07, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Good luck! I'd better do the same... starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  07:53, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Ouch, that botch, I must be getting old. Okay! starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  05:42, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Sigh, the FA failed again. I'm afraid I won't be free to try again until early May. I think the FA would need some quid-pro-quo reviewing of other FAs, and I will only be free enough at that time. Sorry for the delay! starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  13:53, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Wrestle Kingdom 9
This is to let you know that the Wrestle Kingdom 9 article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 4 January 2017. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/January 4, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Precious
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

The Elite
I have one question about the titles held by the Elite. When the young bucks won the DDR Ironman Title, they said "the.elite.the.the.elite". Do you think it would be a reliable source and should we icnclude the ironman title into the article?--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Articles of wrestling teams being named The etc
Have you sent in a warning to the user who keeps on changing the wresting article teams to the, the use is Chrishymalboy99 I think he's being very disruptive while editing I don't know if you feel the same way but I think we should report him HardcoreWrestlingFan (talk) 04:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC) HardcoreWrestlingFan (talk) 04:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Chrishymalboy99
He's at it again moving pages that don't need to be moved I'm not a auto confirmed yet but I have reported and reported this guy and no administrator seems to listen, probably because I'm just starting out never the less this user needs to stop 🛑 HardcoreWrestlingFan (talk) 16:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC) HardcoreWrestlingFan (talk) 16:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Christina Von Eerie
Don't revert. She was the first GFW Women's Champion and it reflects it as such. Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 10:11, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Look at the Pat Patterson article. It says (1 time, inaugural) beside being the WWF Intecontinental Champion in the championships and accomplishment section.  Where were you on that?  Stop reverting.   Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 10:15, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * There are lots of articles where it says "first" or inaugural" in that section. You really need to be more consistent.   Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 10:26, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't see having "inaugural" or "final" in that section as a big deal.  Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 10:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I thought about it. I might.   Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 19:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

WP:4

 * Yay! I finally logged back in and saw we got this before the one-year mark XD starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  03:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Yup! So thanks again for all the hard work :) starship.paint ~  <font style="color:white;background:black;">KO  01:14, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Meiyu Tag
Hello, Ribbon Salminen. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Meiyu Tag, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Chris Troutman ( talk ) 23:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

David Finlay
I've started an article on David Finlay in my sandbox. A quick glance at your user page shows you've done a lot of NJPW articles. If you want to add to it to get it ready to move into mainspace, you are more than welcome too. Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 03:55, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * That's why it's in my sandbox until it is ready to be put in mainspace.  Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 17:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Don't what to do and help
Hello

I need your help during the rewaiting of six months, I kinda returned to the same because I wanted to WCPW but it was getting to someone called Dwdpuma and I pretended to be the guy to only make the goal possible but I was unsucessfull but now I tried to ask for an unblock and unlock and I don't what to do?

So what should I do, you that I only want a second chance but how can I now earn it, I ask for an unlock at meta but still nothing.

So what should I do?

Thanks for your time

I hope you understand

109.49.183.212 (talk) 09:59, 22 July 2017 (UTC) (Martimc123)

P.s:I also saw the reliable source thing and now I know but I prefer tell my conclusion and then tell me if am I correct, let me later know?

NJPW
Hey, long time no see. Just wanted to stop by and say good work on the New Japan articles. I've recently gotten into it and bought New Japan World and they have been helpful in sparking interest. I wish I had gotten more invest long ago. The product is just so much better.-- Will C  02:08, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Appreciate it. REEEEEbbon Salminen   (talk''')  09:04, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

To save you some time
"WP:DUPCAT--please see the non-non-diffusing category." Re: Category:African-American professional wrestlers. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:10, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

British Strong Style
hey i saw ur british strong style page i was working and submitted a draft aswell i injoyed it very much did you wanna take a look at it see if there's any info u missed out and would like to add? don't wanna let my draft go to waste thanks Mirrormaster123 (talk) 02:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Benjamin Satterley
Hey man, since Undertaker lost to Roman Reigns, he is still listed under current roster in wwe.com as same happening as Neville is listed under RAW currents there. As I always follow wwe.com about their status when we got rumor about their releases or retirements. if a roster got released then he or she got listed under alumnis or legend. as I've clearly researched through wwe.com that haven't aired any news regarding Neville's release. See me at my Talk section which is active for 168(I mean 24x7) Broken nutshell (talk) 14:16, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Re:Edits
What I mean by that was the birthname section in an infobox in my opinion should have a complete name, rather than a middle initial if we don't know the person's middle name. I have this opinion because only a few do this but a wide majority that I go to goes along with the same ideology as well, so it's a matter of seeing a few "odd ball articles" that do things a different way in that birth nam section that i fix. I just wanted to make sure you what that what I am doing is not disruptive, but rather good faith with the intention on improving the website Rewind Wrestling (talk) 18:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Gail Kim
Gail Kim, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 09:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Harper and Rowan
Hey there. You recently added a speedy deletion template on the Luke Harper and Erick Rowan article that I created, stating that it was recently deleted via deletion discussion, but I don’t see any history of a discussion or it being recently created and deleted. I created the article by replacing a redirect made in 2015. Can you please explain?  Sekyaw  (talk)  16:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Freebird Rules
Freebird Rules means all members of the team are champions, and any designated members can defend the titles.

Been that way over nearly 40 years (when the gimmick was first introduced)...nothing about what Bullet Club is doing is any different than what a ton of other teams have done over the years, so no need to be different here. Vjmlhds (talk) 18:11, 27 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Update - I've gone up and down the ROH website - there's nothing there contradicts the Freebird/Bullet Club listing that we've had here for the last month or so. Bottom line, there's plenty of sourced material to verify that Bullet Club is using Freebird Rules for the 6-man titles, and nothing to go against it.  "Freebirded" champions count as any other champions (as long as Freebird Rules - or whatever pseudonym is being used i.e. "Bullet Club Rules" - are established). Vjmlhds (talk) 18:27, 27 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Update 2 - Even the story about the Ft. Lauderdale event doesn't contradict the original listing that's been on Wikipedia for the last month. Long story short, Page and the Bucks won the titles, but all members can defend them, thus making the whole squad champions. Vjmlhds (talk) 18:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Chaos (professional wrestling)
Hello im new in wikipedia and i saw the Chaos (professional wrestling) and for me the article is a littev bit confusing the part of the introduction and the history could you help me on editing that article. But i would also like to know your opinion.

Thanks.

TheUs3r12 (talk) 19:02, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Chaos (professional wrestling) 2
I know that the article is a mess but why don't you care? Don't you want to do the same as at the Bullet Club and the Los Ingobernables de Japon article?

TheUs3r12 (talk) 19:15, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Chaos (professional wrestling) 3
But don't you want the article to become a featured article? I know that's a lot of work, but for the articles from the Bullet Club and LIJ that i saw that you wrote i know that the Chaos article could be a featured article like the Wrestle Kingdom 9 and you coud pull this off and the Wrestle Kingdom 12 it's just around the corner and about a better motivation. I know that it's lot what i am asking but could you do it please?

TheUs3r12 (talk) 19:30, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Chaos (professional wrestling) 3
Did you received the last message that i sent you?

TheUs3r12 (talk) 20:16, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Defiant Wrestling
Hello can you give me some help? For me the Defiant Wrestling article is a mess but i think it is acceptable but i wouçd like to know your opinion and again can you help me saving Defiant Wrestling?

TheUs3r12 (talk) 20:01, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

★Trekker (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message. Merry Christmas, hope you're having a relaxing time during this period and that next year will be even better for us all here.★Trekker (talk) 13:22, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Same to you. REEEEEbbon Salminen   (talk''')  14:52, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Defiant article
Thanks, I haven't seen the talk page, but I'm kinda in a difficulty, how should we make like Progress?

How should we do the history, the WCPW/Defiant or Defiant only?

Also, how should we do the infobox?

192.71.244.20 (talk) 23:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Defiant Wresting
How can i do to put the announcement of the creation of the WCPW titles and the return of Loaded??? Also what should be done to put the roster??? Also that were the only sources covering the titles and the return of loaded.

TheCorageone1 (talk) 12:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Defiant Wresting
Every promotion as a roster at least there should be a way to put the roster???

TheCorageone1 (talk) 12:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Defiant Championship
Hello, Ribbon Salminen,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Defiant Championship should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Defiant Championship.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Nick Moyes (talk) 22:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Matt Riddle
(Undid revision 818585161 by In ictu oculi (talk) wait for the move)
 * The point of doing an advance template fix is it shows up just how many hardwired links need to be fixed. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)