User talk:Ribosome786

Blocked
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. — Diannaa (talk) 09:30, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. Please respond to the following questions, explaining in your own words: Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. — Diannaa (talk) 09:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
 * What is copyright?
 * How is Wikipedia licenced?
 * Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
 * Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
 * How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?
 * This talk page is full of warnings for disruptive editing and copyright violations. I would recommend no unblock without topic ban from South Asian articles. Ratnahastin  (talk) 09:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

You are not permitted to edit or remove a declined unblock request for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 13:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Sarsuti (June 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ratnahastin was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siege of Sarsuti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Siege_of_Sarsuti Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ratnahastin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Siege_of_Sarsuti reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 01:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Imran expedition against Kaikan jats
Hello, Ribosome786

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Babegriev, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Imran expedition against Kaikan jats, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:


 * 1) Edit the page
 * 2) Remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) Click the  button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And remember to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bgv. (talk) 07:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muslims Invasion of Kaikan (June 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muslims Invasion of Kaikan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Muslims_Invasion_of_Kaikan Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:EmeraldRange&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Muslims_Invasion_of_Kaikan reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 EmeraldRange  (talk/contribs) 13:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Indus River 1027


The article Battle of Indus River 1027 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Sources refer to this an event within the larger conflict, and multiple mention that the death tolls and boat accounts seem exaggerated"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 02:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of Ash-Sharki


The article Battle of Ash-Sharki has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Article fails WP:GNG; no WP:SIGCOV."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nxcrypto  Message  16:00, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Battle of fort Rawar


The article Battle of fort Rawar has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG; no WP:SIGCOV."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nxcrypto  Message  16:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)