User talk:Ricagambeda

Great contributions to Wilson's School - nice to see someone who is not vandalising it. Parmesan 22:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wilsons Old Buildings 1687.gif
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Wilsons Old Buildings 1687.gif, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Wilsons Old Buildings 1687.gif fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''This image should be speedily deleted as it is an exact duplicate of image, which is linked to Wilson's School, as this image was intended to be. Parmesan 23:37, 26 May 2007 (UTC)''' To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Wilsons Old Buildings 1687.gif, please affix the template   to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Wilsons Old Buildings 1687.gif itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Wilsonscoa.gif listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wilsonscoa.gif, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 16:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Wsouthwark.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Wsouthwark.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 16:41, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The above also applies to:
 * File:Wbrecon.jpg
 * File:Wcamberwell.jpg
 * File:Wgreencoat.jpg
 * File:Whayes.jpg
 * File:Wilsonscamberwell.jpg
 * File:Wilson'sartdt.jpg

This is all my original artwork but I do not have time to do all this. Please feel free to delete it all from Wikipedia. The coat of arms is also not a 'blatant breach of copyright' but the coat of arms awarded to the school by the Royal College of Heralds. Yours, Ricagambeda
 * File:Wilsonsfoundationbuilding.jpg
 * —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 16:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Wilsonscoa.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Wilsonscoa.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 16:52, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

I am still perplexed over the deletion of the school coat of arms image. There is no copyright issue. We have contacted the College of Arms and they have replied: 'There is a difference between the bearing and the display of arms. One may display a coat of arms which is not one’s own; the important distinction is that nobody could think that you were claiming them as your own when you displayed them (e.g. the licence holder of the 'Wellington Arms’ who displays the arms of the Duke of Wellington is not considered to be claiming them as his own).' Wikipedia freely displays countless other coats of arms including those of the present British royal family and their forbears. Ricagambeda 2 May, 2017

Proposed deletion of File:Wilsonsschoolfront.jpg


The file File:Wilsonsschoolfront.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)