User talk:Ricagu

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 99.136.254.163 (talk) 00:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. 99.136.254.163 (talk) 00:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. 99.136.254.163 (talk) 19:08, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Richard Agudelo for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Richard Agudelo, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Richard Agudelo until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JNW (talk) 21:35, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Please stop
I am trying to save the article here and make it better so it won't be deleted. You continually reverting to the promotion-filled version of Richard Agudelo is not helping. Please stop. Silver seren C 21:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * You need to have references to reliable sources for any information you are going to include on the page. I am in the process of trying to find rleiable sources for the info that is already on there. It would be much more useful if you could find me proof that he submitted images to the Metropolitan Museum, the Hall of Fame, ect, as I can't find any proof of that. Silver  seren C 22:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

The release of the Tommy Hilfiger Rock Style book party was at The Metropolitan Museum of Art and they had the show at the Met and Richard's images coincided with show for the term of the show.

YOU SHOULD STOP!!! The fact are on the internet to be found. Look at the links to everything!

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JNW (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. JNW (talk) 22:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Richard Agudelo, you may be blocked from editing. Şłџğģő 22:01, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, as you did with Richard Agudelo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Şłџğģő 22:03, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for your disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war&#32;at Richard Agudelo. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppet
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Ricagu. If you wish to defend yourself before your block expires, please do so here and I or someone else will be along to copy your text to that page. Thank you. Şłџğģő 18:58, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Agudelo


A tag has been placed on Richard Agudelo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cindamuse (talk) 14:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Richard Agudelo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. As you know, this has been discussed at a deletion discussion (in which you took part) and an unambiguous consensus was reached to delete the article. It is not acceptable for an individual editor to ignore such consensus and re-create the article, as you have done. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:12, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Since posting the above warning I have looked more thoroughly at your history, and it is clear you are past the stage of being warned about creating that particular article. You have therefore been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for your persistent disruptive editing. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2010 (UTC)