User talk:Ricardojimenezperis

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 17:27, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Nomination of LeanXcale database for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LeanXcale database is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/LeanXcale database until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Ricardojimenezperis. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article LeanXcale, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:03, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

I didn't know about this policy. Obviously, I have a conflict of interest since I am the founder and CEO of the company. But it is obvious that all other database company entries have not been created by someone external to the company or without a conflict of interest to the company. Let us be serious. It is simply that the user appears not to have a relation, what simply looking at an email it is impossible to know that it is the only identification for contributing in wikipedia. One can always ask a friend to write the entry and it does not make any difference. Ricardojimenezperis (talk) 01:39, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes. Very true, which is why many of us work to make sure that advertising and promotion of companies that are not considered notable by Wikipedia's standards isn't allowed in the encyclopedia. Notable here is a technical turn of phrase that basically means "If you saw all the sourcing written on a subject, you would know it should be included in a general purpose encyclopedia." You can read more about that policy at WP:Notability. It is important to note that being notable is not the only requirement for inclusion in Wikipedia: the subject must also not be excluded by WP:What Wikipedia is not, which included Wikipedia is not a platform for advertising. Hope this is helpful and helps explain things for you. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:46, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

April 2022
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 16:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)