User talk:Ricardoramirezj~enwiki/October 2006

Image copyright problem with Image:Fotografía_Satelital_de_Cúcuta.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fotografía_Satelital_de_Cúcuta.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

link to dane.gov.co
I followed the link you posted, and there is no data about Cucuta's population in that article. Please make sure you post the right references otherwise it will be removed. -- F3rn 4nd0  18:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Guide to writing better articles this might be helpful to you, please take your time and read it.  F3rn 4nd0  18:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Cucuta
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you.

help
I'm willing to help you but don't make it harder, please FOLLOW the guidelines. This is not your private website. If you are not willing to read the guidelines at least base your article on GOOD ARTICLES pages about cities, Boston, for example. Don't use your Personal Own Views (POVs), you have to PROVE IT with REFERENCES!!. (If you're trying to make a point at least place a link by it to make it verifiable. Preferably official documents or newspaper articles)

About the map, it was based on the map from the government of Norte de Santander official website, the INVIAS.gov.co and the Agustin Codazzi website, which are official. If you can prove wikipedia that cucuta is bigger please go ahead but with an official verifiable map and maybe we can work out something out to improve it.

I've been in your same position.

-- F3rn 4nd0  12:28, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Earthquake of Cúcuta
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Earthquake of Cúcuta, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Earthquake of Cúcuta. Then you should do one of the following:
 * Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Earthquake of Cúcuta where we can find that note; or
 * Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Earthquake of Cúcuta.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Esprit15d 17:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Because the page is deleted, I don't remember where the original material was taken from. But it was a copyvio of a site that has not released it's material into the GDFL.  If it has, no proof of this was provided on the talk page.  If the information has been released into the GDFL, follow the directions above to have the page restored.  Happy editing!-- Esprit15d  (talk ¤ contribs) 17:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to September 11, 2001 attacks
Your recent edit to September 11, 2001 attacks (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page September 11, 2001 attacks on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --StuffOfInterest 19:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to September 11, 2001 attacks. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --StuffOfInterest 20:03, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

sustentar el articulo de cucuta

 * Ricardo, si sigue escribiendo cosas sin sustentar con un link o una referencia le van a seguir borrando todo. ya alguien le borro parte del articulo (lo del terremoto). es mas FACIL poner el link al lado de donde las encontro en el articulo!!!! copy paste!!

Si esas graficas sobre estadisticas de poblacion son del DANE Esas graficas son propiedad intelectual del DANE, tiene que especificarse en la pagina de informacion sobre la grafica y si es permitido por el DANE utilizar esa grafica (Donde la encontro?). (Si la informacion que usted dice es veridica entonces se hace una nota diciendo que el DANE se contradice con la informacion dada) En cuanto a las fotos creo haberlas visto en paginas sobre cucuta, si alguien se da cuenta va a perder todo el tiempo que gasto subiendola porque van a borrarla ademas de que va a perder credibilidad. Otra cosa, donde le puse es para que usted sustente con un link, de donde saco esa informacion. Puedes utlizar mas de una vez el mismo link. No se complique la vida ni se la complique a otros, si pone los links le puedo ayudar con la traduccion y el paraphrasing.

Si continua agregando cosas de su opinion personal o sin sustentar no voy a poder ayudarle. -- F3rn 4nd0  17:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Para poder traducirlo y redactarlo bien necesito el link de donde lo saco.. hay que sustentarlo.-- F3rn 4nd0  [[Image:Flag of the United States.svg|20px]] 08:25, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Articulo tiene que ser neutral y balanceado
No puede negar con un POV algo que esta VERIFICADO CON UN MEDIO LEGITIMO y menos borrarlo porque es considerado vandalismo. la BBC no se inventa cosas... y no creo que la victimas que murieron ese dia sean una mentira. Si quiere un articulo bueno sobre cucuta tiene que tener todo! wikipedia lamentalemente no es un folleto de promocion, es una enciclopedia donde toda la informacion valida comprobada segun sus reglas es aceptada-- F3rn 4nd0  22:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Me parece ironico que me mande un link de ese diario, lo primero que vi fue DESPLAZADOS!! de titular (eso tambien deberia ir al articulo! cuantos desplazados por la guerra hay en Cucuta?).

Le recuerdo que no es por espacio porque entonces la segunda guerra mundial hay que resumirla a 10 parrafos? la guerra de vietnam? el conflicto de sudan? ruanda? yo no escribi eso.. eso lo escribio la HISTORIA!!! yo no me he inventado eso ni mucho menos la BBC! eso es negar lo que pasa frente a usted, es la realidad lamentablemente, pero negarla no la va a desaparecer al contrario se puede volver a repetir. El hecho de que que haya puesto eso ahi es para dar la mayor informacion posible de la ciudad! De eso se trata una enciclopedia, de recopilar toda la informacion.. vea mexico city o washington dc tienen su problema de crimen. Como le dije esto no es para promocionar lo "bonito" de una ciudad, sino absolutamente todo.(en NY hay que negar el 11 de septiembre para que no se vea mal la ciudad?) Esta bien si no lo quiere colocar en el inicio pero hace parte de Cucuta, quiera o no quiera... Le recuerdo que esta enciclopedia tiene reglas!! sino las sigue le van a seguir borrando todo y lo van a bloquear. se que tiene muchas ganas de ver un buen articulo sobre cucuta, pero no vaya contra la corriente porque se cansa.

Busque el articulo que quiere traducir y no estaba en wikipedia en espanol.. y creo que ni siquiera estaba sustentado. -- F3rn 4nd0  02:18, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Qué más compatriota?
Hola Caleiva le escribo para pedirle que me ayude a pulir unos artículos relacionados con Cúcuta que traduje mediante Google de la Wikipedia en Español.

Ayudame con lo que puedas...

Los artículos en cuestión son los siguientes:


 * Cúcuta
 * History of Cúcuta
 * Battle of Cúcuta
 * Orography of Cúcuta
 * Hydrography of Cúcuta and North Santander

Muchas gracias!

--Ricardoramirezj 13:02, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Mano, yo no soy Caleiva. Me encantaría ayudar, pero es que estoy embolatado con el estudio. --Fibonacci 22:34, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Hola, tampoco soy Caleiva. Le aconsejo que no use un traductor automático, las traducciones son pésimas. Si lo hace, por favor indique en dónde está el original en castellano para revisar; sin él, es muy difícil escribir algo coherente. Vale, Lcgarcia 05:33, 17 October 2006 (UTC)