User talk:RiceEnthusiast

Welcome!
Hi RiceEnthusiast! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! 2A00:23EE:1478:6AAC:D41C:52FF:FE2C:4707 (talk) 11:20, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RDFox


A tag has been placed on RDFox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Fram (talk) 14:53, 11 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Copied from deleted article talk page:

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because it is a factual statement of what RDFox is, its history, development, and what it is used for with provided citations to demonstrate their veracity. If I have run afoul of Wikipedia's standards by accident owing to inexperience then I request permission to correct the page to the required standards, but I believe the assertion the page be deleted to be a far too significant remedy to the problem at hand. --RiceEnthusiast (talk) 15:02, 11 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about the existence of something and what it does. Wikipedia articles must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the topic, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability. Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 15:05, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Understood, with permission I will take time to rework it to better meet these guidelines. RiceEnthusiast (talk) 19:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC)