User talk:RichHargreaves

Welcome!
Hello "BovineBoy" - why did you delete our edits? I represent (OF MY OWN VOLITION IN MY FREE TIME IN THIS CASE) the production company of this film and all of the information we entered is directly verifiable on IMDB and elsewhere. In particular, the poster that you have reinstated is illegal and unapproved and therefore VIOLATES OUR COPYRIGHT and should be removed and replaced with the standard international poster which, again, can be found everywhere including IMDB. FIX THIS.


 * Hi! I would highly recommend reading our policy about WP:COI. You should never be editing an article that you are being paid to represent. You can propose changes on the talk pages with verifiable sources and other editors can edit. IMDb is not considered a reliable source because content can be added or modified by anyone, see WP:IMDBREF. In terms of the poster, you would probably need to provide evidence that the poster is not official. An easier approach would be to upload a different image. I would be happy to help with that if you are interested! BOVINEBOY 2008 00:09, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi Bovineboy - I'm doing this in my spare time, I'm not being paid. And I'm not advocating for anything, I just want the correct poster and correct information up on the page (for example, naming all of the producers - information which is literally all over the internet if you care to look, for example here: https://pullbackcamera.com/fld). You say that IMDB is not an appropriate source, but what is the source for the information currently in the stub? For example, the decision to name Michel Merkt and none of the actual lead producers on the film, what is that based on? Nowhere in the world, other than Wikipedia, will you find Michel Merkt credited as the sole producer of the film. As for the inappropriate poster, it is clearly stated that this was uploaded by BRIGADE (it's in the username, I'm not revealing any private information by pointing this out). Brigade is a PR company in the pay of US distributors Quiver Distribution, ie. COI applies. Certainly, we have paperwork to demonstrate that this poster is a copyright violation, however obviously we cannot share this paperwork on a public platform. But more to the point: please explain why you are willing to accept/protect COI content from Brigade whilst rejecting my amendments? Yes, I can upload the correct image, however this would be under fair use rules, not a commons image, and I do not have the permissions on Wikipedia to upload such an image at this time.

Also: if you want to talk about COI then please explain, what is your own agenda? If you are entirely impartial and simply seeking to present the most correct and accurate information on the page (ie. the job of a Wikipedia editor), then the most cursory of investigations by yourself would reveal that my edits were/are factually correct and that you are certainly not improving Wikipedia by repeatedly deleting them.

Here is a list of edits made directly to the page by Brigade (including adding the poster) which you have accepted without citing COI:

curprev 16:33, 8 January 2021‎ Erica brigade talk contribs‎ 2,867 bytes +22‎  undothank Tags: Visual edit Reverted curprev 16:33, 8 January 2021‎ Erica brigade talk contribs‎ m 2,845 bytes −5‎  Release date undothank Tags: Visual edit Reverted curprev 22:22, 7 December 2020‎ Erica brigade talk contribs‎ m 2,917 bytes +56‎  Distributor and Run Time undothank Tag: Visual edit curprev 22:20, 7 December 2020‎ Erica brigade talk contribs‎ 2,861 bytes +27‎  Added in poster. undothank Tag: Visual edit curprev 22:12, 7 December 2020‎ Erica brigade talk contribs‎ m 2,834 bytes +438‎  Synopsis undothank Tag: Visual edit

=
Hello, RichHargreaves, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Fanny Lye Deliver'd did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. BOVINEBOY 2008 20:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)