User talk:Rich Farmbrough/Archive/2006 January

Date Wikification
Hi, Rich. I don't know whether this will affect the wikifying of dates that you do, but I thought you would want to comment if it does. Talk to you later, Kjkolb 03:02, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Surrey10
Just a heads-up that Surrey10 has struck again,at some length:. I've reverted this spree, but I don't know what the longer-term solution is. Mark1 19:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Australia First Movement
I have reverted the link away from UK for British and made it British Empire, from which they wanted to seceed. No doubt their support from Irish catholics included people sympathetic to Irish Nationalists who may have been UK citizens. Harrypotter 22:43, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

High Court of Justice
The High Court is not a solely Eng institution. The correct link is [High Court of Justice|High Court]. Regards FedLawyer 10:38, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Mike Neville
Never realised he had a mathematical connection. Mike Neville (anchorman) - was the PlanetMath paste a glitch? Charles Matthews 22:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Mike Neville (anchorman)
Hi Rich. I have a strong suspicion that in this edit at the above-named article you made a mistake by inserting the planetmath template and putting it in the combinatorics category. I removed those for now, but please let me know if I was wrong. You can reply here. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Exorcism video
Hi, I see that you deleted an entry that someone had appended to my Talk page. I hadn't bothered to check that video, but now I am curious. Was it porn or something? Did I miss anything worth seeing? 8-) All the best, Jorge Stolfi 16:41, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks... Jorge Stolfi 12:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

AfD of MDM - Consultoria e Negócios Ltda.
Rich, I nominated this page a while back; you deleted it on December 27. I just noticed it has been recreated. I tried to re-nominate it for deletion, but when I put the tag in the top of the page, it linked to the old discussion, not a new one. So I'm not sure how to do that. I'd appreciate your help. Thanks. --Thunk 17:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

An old edit
I got a chuckle out of your "wikify dates" edit of the Long March 1 rocket. But treating that as if there were a date in that name and in the link to the Long [[March 1 rocket family]] screwed things up, royally! Gene Nygaard 21:42, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

personal attacks
Why again can we not personally attack people?


 * No, this isn't an encyclopedia, nor any attempt to build one. An encyclopedia is based on verified facts.  This isn't, but rather on whoever can log on most often to their page of choice.  Wikipedia has great potential, but if you allow the status quo to continue, it will never be taken seriously by anyone with any serious standing in the academic community.  But back to the point, my only personal attacks were the result of what was, at root, personal attacks against myself and two other posters, essentially calling us idiots, ignoring our serious concerns about a page, and taking control en masse.  Immaturity by others is the sole root of my personal attacks, not any wish by myself to attack other users without cause.  Since that situation, I've been trying to show the various fallacies of the system that need to be corrected to have something worthwhile at hand.

User:129.105.104.223 21:35, 27 January 2006‎ (UTC)