User talk:Richard0048/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello, Richard0048, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Eritrea. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Aaron Bruce ( talk ) 19:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Coffee. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 10:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 2 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Kingdom of Aksum page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=703009930 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F703009930%7CKingdom of Aksum%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for March 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demographics of Eritrea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tigre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Making the Eritrea page more logical
Hi Richard. I've got some ideas for making the Eritrea page more logical for readers. I'd like to group together similar topics on the Eritrea page, which is how topics are arranged on other nation pages.

For example, later, I'm going to more closely group together:


 * 1.) Government,
 * 2.) foreign relations,
 * 3.) and administrative divisions.

Because those topics are all related to governing Eritrea.

Anticla rutila (talk) 12:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi sounds like a good, on that I can agree. However could you please stop editing the images and moving them around? Cant see how it benifits the page, its just your subjective opinion. Richard0048 (talk) 18:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

---

Richard, it's not just my opinion. Pictures are meant to be aligned to the righthand side of the page. It also looks better. You want the Eritrea page to look good, right? Because it's looking a bit chaotic at the moment. What if I tidy up the Ethiopia page, and it eventually starts looking better than the Eritrea page? Lol, we know that's not right!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Images#Location

On that edit, I also improved the grammar, and added an internal link to Periplus of the Erythraean Sea. I'm going to put that link back in, and improve the grammar again. Anticla rutila (talk) 12:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Clearly that is your opinion since nobody has objected to current style and formating. It has been brought up since you started moving around the images and topics. Those where big changes and you did not bother to explain why you did those changes. Regarding the topics I do agree that they can structured in the way you suggested above. Images should be aligned to the right hand side in most cases, hoewever not in every case. Just look at other country pages and other pages. In some cases a image related to a topic can be displaced by other images making the image loose its context. aHowever I could agree to move some images that are on the left side to the right side. I can do those changes.  Lastly we  should not  to compare this page to Ethiopian page. Richard0048 (talk) 14:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Eritrea content dispute
There is a discussion at Talk:Eritrea regarding recent edits at the Eritrea article in which you are involved. Your account will have received alerts regarding this matter. I have suggested you and Soupforone come to an agreement on the best way forward before either of you continue editing the article. Soupforone has made suggestions and is now awaiting your response. However, you have not edited Wikipedia since 1 July, and you do not have email enabled. It is inappropriate to hold up progress on Wikipedia indefinitely, so if you have not responded by 14 July, then editing will resume on the article.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  08:21, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Eritrea. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. '':Please do not make any further edits to Eritrea until you have joined in with the Talk:Eritrea discussion. Any edits you make that are not first agreed will be reverted, and if you continue to edit disruptively you will be blocked. ''  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  09:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Eritrea. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  22:14, 16 July 2016 (UTC)


 * We edit on Wikipedia by consensus, not by force. Discuss, agree, then edit. Each time you revert on the Eritrea article you will be blocked, with the block period increasing in duration. I suggest that you either engage fully in the discussion, making no edits to Eritrea until there is an agreement, or work in a different area of Wikipedia. There is plenty to do - we have over 5 million articles to edit, and lots of backlogs.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  22:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. AcidSnow (talk) 02:07, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Edit warring at Eritrea
You've been warned per the outcome of this 3RR complaint (permalink). You may be blocked if you make any further reverts at Eritrea without getting a prior consensus, either on the talk page or at DRN. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

FYI about who is AcidSnow
Allow me to suggest you to read " manmer2.blogspot.com/2015/06/middayexpress-withdrawal-ban.html " in order to understand who is user AcidSnow. He is an "underground" supporter of ISIS/Al-Shabaab inside our en.wikipedia, and is linked to a banned user called Middayexpress.......If you want more info about him, please go to https://www.blogger.com/profile/17629549463392207787...--Limit3skip (talk) 19:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * FYI that was (I've just locked this account) a long-term abuser known as "brunodam". --Vituzzu (talk) 13:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Abyssinian people
Article has been maintained for several years for an ethno-linguistic people who speak what liguists classify as Semitic languages. Similar articles are Bantu peoples, Nilotic peoples, Romance peoples, Iranian peoples etc which includes people who leave across various sovereign countries with various nationalities. I am only here to make wikipedia articles in a way that makes sense and try to make the regions articles with equal standards with other articles developed by highly qualified intellectuals who ignore nationalist and politicians opinion. If we exclude Eritrean Semitic speaking people for nationalism reason then we also would have splited the above mentioned articles dedicated for ethno-linguistic people and also spliting the article for Germans, Koreans, Punjabis, Afars and Somalis who have several nationalities with Punjabis & Koreans with hostile relation. Excluding them from Abyssinian group means that 100s of respected historians use of Abissinian people to refer Axumite, Daamat kings and inhabitants does not refer to semitic Eritreans and then we would have been deleting Axum and Daamat from formation under the Eritrea article. By the time this kingdoms existed there is no proof of Tigrinya or Amarinya language but proto-semitic language that later divided into todays modern languages just like the ancient Roman Latin language is now divided into Spanish, Italian and Portugese. When historians speak about Roman empire they either say 'Romans' or 'Latins' to refer the people because saying Spanish or Italians would be historical distortion, similarly historians use 'Abyssinian' when speaking of the inhabitants of Axum & Daamat. — EthiopianHabesha (talk) 21:19, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Ethnic groups in Eritrea
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Template:Ethnic groups in Eritrea. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Bamyers99 (talk) 19:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Eritrea
Hi Richard0048,

I added the Arabic language to the infobox under: "Recognised national languages" of the article Eritrea. In addition, I added Arabic to the chapter "Languages" in the article. I also added some sources for this information. Then, you deleted this change with the explanation "HOA not redundant to East Africa, no need to remove content".

It is fact that Arabic is a recognised national language of Eritrea. May I ask you why did you delete this?

Thank you in advance.

Kind regards,

Balu --Balu12345 (talk) 10:48, 11 October 2016 (UTC)