User talk:Richard75/Archive 2020

Orphaned non-free image File:Judge Hershey (2000 AD).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Judge Hershey (2000 AD).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Judge Hershey into List of Judge Dredd characters. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — 🎆 Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:48, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Fuck off! Richard75 (talk) 01:09, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Archiving
I noticed that you archived part of Talk:Isaac Asimov. I also noticed on the talkpage that there is bot who was set up to do that, User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn. Since that bot apparently is not doing the job, could you perhaps create another automatic archiving process on that talkpage? Debresser (talk) 08:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I think it should look like this. Debresser (talk) 23:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

"Judge Dredd/Archive 1" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Judge Dredd/Archive 1. Since you had some involvement with the Judge Dredd/Archive 1 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:03, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Judge Cal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judge Cal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Judge Cal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:45, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Judge Cal.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Judge Cal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Judge Cal2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Judge Cal2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Judge McGruder (comics character).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Judge McGruder (comics character).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mechanismo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mechanismo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mechanismo2A.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mechanismo2A.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Template
The template is supposed to look at the historical development of the overall issue of separation of church and state with respect to Catholicism. Because the church and state were most undoubtedly not separate in many historical separations, the historical examples to the contrary are still helpful for people looking up info on this.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 19:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Article Three of the United States Constitution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corruption of Blood ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Changes in Isaac Asimov page
In The Isaac Asimov page, selected bibliography section,it is stated that the order of the Galactic Empire Novels is The Currents of Space followed by The Stars, like Dust. I don't agree with this, since the Currents of Space is second to be publish and second too in chronological order, as is it said by the Galactic Empire page. "(However, Asimov erroneously stated in 1988 in the "Author's Note" to Prelude to Foundation that book #6 was "The Currents of Space" (1952), and that this was "the first of my Empire novels," and that book #7 was "The Stars, Like Dust" (1951), which was "[the] second Empire novel.")". As it is I changed it to the, I consider, correct order, just to be reversed by you. If you disagree please tell me your reasons so the Galactic Empire page can be updated properly or change back to my corrections. Thanks. Sombrachunga (talk) 18:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Evaluation of importance level for a WikiProject
I see you reverted my evaluation of the importance level at Talk:List of English monarchs. The evaluation I changed (from top- to low-priority) represents the level of importance for WikiProject Lists. For WPLists, "English monarchs" is NOT a top-priority article. It may well be top-priority for you as an editor, or for WikiProject English Royalty, but not for WPLists. The evaluations are done for the benefit of the WikiProject and their maintenance efforts, and does not represent anything about the article, its content, its notability, or any other aspect about the article. See WikiProject Council/Guide. I am a member of WPLists; I notice you are not a member of WPLists (meaning your evaluation of our project's priority level does not supersede my evaluation). Therefore, I have reverted your edit. Normal Op (talk) 02:56, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Hunting Party (Judge Dredd story)


The article The Hunting Party (Judge Dredd story) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Scorcher
Why have you vandalised the Scorcher page. That issue contained every single thing that was listed, and I have the issue to prove it. Please undo your changes and revert back to the original, thank you. Gusssss (talk) 14:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of The Hunting Party (Judge Dredd story) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Hunting Party (Judge Dredd story) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Hunting Party (Judge Dredd story) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:11, 8 October 2020 (UTC)