User talk:RichardAlexander22

Speedy deletion nomination of Captured Photography & Film


A tag has been placed on Captured Photography & Film, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Please take a moment to carefully read the above, which states: "please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself". Thank you for your cooperation. Magnolia677 (talk) 02:44, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Captured Photography & Film


A tag has been placed on Captured Photography & Film, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Magnolia677 (talk) 02:45, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Dave Mac for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dave Mac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dave Mac until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 02:57, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Wet Paint Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wet Paint Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wet Paint Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Fresh City: Bottles Up for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fresh City: Bottles Up is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fresh City: Bottles Up until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 03:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

AFD tag removal on Dave Mac
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Nakon 03:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. Nakon 04:03, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. How do I respond to Articles for deletion notices from articles? Because people are writing deletion requests on pages that I have contributed to with very reliable sources. Inlcuding iTunes, Spotify, Globe and Mail, Major Dailies and more. One user has ravaged through and flagged all my pages. In response to: Nakon  03:53, 9 April 2015 (UTC) --RichardAlexander22 (talk) 04:07, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello, You may respond to AFD discussions by visiting the discussion page that is linked at the top of the article. The discussion lasts for 7 days, so please don't feel rushed to contribute if you are still gathering information on the articles.  For the Dave Mac article, the discussion may be found at Articles_for_deletion/Dave_Mac.  Please review these guidelines to the deletion discussion process.  If you have any questions, please let me know.  Thanks,  Nakon  04:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your response Nakon. Not sure if you have an opinion or not but I do feel that the following pages flagged for deletion notices have reliable sources and are incorrectly being target by a user practicing Disruptive_editing:


 * Dave Mac
 * Tanner Fresh
 * Wet Paint Records
 * Fresh City: Bottles Up
 * Captured Photography & Film

Links include iTunes, Globe & Mail, Spotify, Amazon, verified Twitter accounts, Worldstar, etc. etc. very noteworthy sources. --RichardAlexander22 (talk) 04:35, 9 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Let's be clear on something: NONE OF THOSE ARE CONSIDERED RELIABLE SOURCES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONFERRING NOTABILITY. Self-published sources, blog posts, trivial mentions, directory listings, user reviews, tweets -- none of those count.
 * Please read Golden rule to get an idea of what is required. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:45, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Amatulić Although books, papers and print are reliable sources, some of which have been source in the very articles being discussed, but these links still do provide some credibility in the online world regardless of the Golden rule. Considering iTunes owns 63% of the music market it should hold some merit in these, and any future Wikipedia articles.--RichardAlexander22 (talk) 20:57, 11 April 2015 (UTC)


 * On Wikipedia, youtube, itunes, etc. provide no credibility at all. Any band can release a song to iTunes, it means nothing whatsoever for conferring notability on a subject. As an analogy, Wikipedia is the world's largest online resource and it almost always has a top spot in Google searches for almost any topic. Does that mean, because I contribute to Wikipedia, that I should be considered notable too? No, it doesn't. In the same fashion, a band's contribution to the iTunes catalog doesn't mean it merits a Wikipedia article.


 * If you want to form a consensus for changing the inclusion criteria for bands or musicians, the place to do it is on that talk page for WP:BAND.


 * I must ask: Your contribution history suggests that you have an association with the topics you have been writing about. Have you read the guideline Conflict of interest?


 * If you have any paid association with Fresh City or its members, or a record label (as an employee, contractor, consultant, manager, PR representative, promoter, concert venue, etc.), you need to disclose it publicly, preferably on your user page. This is a requirement of the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, which you agreed to abide by when you created an account here. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:20, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestions. No I do not, These are my first articles I wrote; so I use them to learn the process of building and linking articles..RichardAlexander22 (talk) 22:54, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Captured Photography & Film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riff Raff. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fresh City Records


A tag has been placed on Fresh City Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fresh City


A tag has been placed on Fresh City requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:36, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tanner Fresh


A tag has been placed on Tanner Fresh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 17:46, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dave Mac


A tag has been placed on Dave Mac, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 20:48, 12 May 2015 (UTC)