User talk:RichardOwen97

Speedy deletion nomination of Funky Dee


A tag has been placed on Funky Dee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:44, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Deliberately misleading content
Please remove the fake "You have new messages" message from the top of this page. While deliberately wasting the time of other users may amuse you, it is not a legitimate part of the use of Wikipedia. If you want a reference to a guideline relating to this then you may like to see WP:SMI, though in my opinion such a reference should not be needed. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:49, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

I deleted it. Happy?   RichardOwen97  talk  17:26, 5 January, 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Sorry if I was a little more unfriendly than I needed to be. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
Hope it's wonderful!  PrincessofLlyr royal court 17:09, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
--Tyw7 (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 08:07, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

80.197.109.183
Re.

No idea what this was, really, but wanted to make sure you'd seen it:

Best,  Chzz  ► 17:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello from MOTD
Hello. We could do with your assistance for suggestions of mottos and any decisions on current ones. Please see Motto of the day/Nominations. In case this situation occurs again, we would like a discussion on emergency mottos. Please see WT:MOTD/N. Simply south...... 14:47, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

MOTD's State of Emergency + 1st of May's Motto
As you probably already know, we are facing some problems at MOTD. I am personally monitoring all the nominations on a daily basis and I'm finding very difficult to aprove the motto for the next day. The number of nominations has grown significantly, but even then it seems not enough. Please, if you have time, take a look at the nominations. And, if you like some of them but you think they are not good enough for being approved because of the set of links or and etcetera, please, try to improve them where it is possible. At this rate, I fear that we will see the end of the project. Thanks in advance. I have also added a special nomination for this Sunday, 1st of May (International Workers' Day or May Day). Please, take a look at it if you can. All the best. –p joe f (talk • contribs) 15:06, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

P.S.: I'm sorry to bother you again, but take a look at this if you can. Once again, thank you. –p joe f (talk • contribs) 18:28, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Mother's Day 2011 or 2012
Okay, I'm here again to bother you (again and again... sorry). Things seem to go much better at MOTD, right now. THANK YOU!!! The reason why I'm writing you is the following: next Sunday (8th of May) is Mother's Day. I know that it is celebrated on different days around the world, but I'd love if we could (and are able to) make our "very-little" contribution in honour of all the mothers in the world. For the upcoming 8th of May (Sunday) there is already a motto in schedule, but I think that we can move the motto approved for that day to another date and to put one about mothers in place of it. Here is my nomination. Thank you in advance and all the best! –p joe f (talk • contribs) 12:51, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of North Home Counties Sunday Football League


The article North Home Counties Sunday Football League has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable competition

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:12, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Need help
Dear Sir,

I am a novice here and need help with the editing of the page Rooma Mehra. Would really appreciate the intervention of an experienced, kind Wikipedian such as yourself.

I apologize for any liberties taken.

Thank you

Anthonio2010 (talk) 04:10, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

FUI
This is just a reminder. If a motto has been used multiple times it should be under or added to Motto of the day/Nominations/Frequently used ideas. Simply south...... improving for 5 years So much for ER 10:00, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Motto of the Day Motto Shop
Hello! My name is Belugaboy, and by now, you and I both have heard of the Motto Shop, and if not, there's a Motto Shop! It's an exclusive place where users can get their own motto to live by on the wiki. It's great, but we're really running slow, in fact, we haven't seen a customer in months. So we thought YOU, the contributors to Motto of the Day, could spread the word to your WikiFriends, heck, order yourself one, whether you have or haven't before. Thank you and warm regards to all of you!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Belugaboy (talk) at 15:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC).

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Montenegro national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Friendly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Future of MOTD
I've decided to start a project discussion on this. Please see WT:MOTD. Simply south...... having large explosions for 5 years 17:43, 6 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi Richard, hope you are fine. You may have noticed over the past few days (5–7 March) that MOTD has displayed "This space for rent" or a red link. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

April Fool Motto
April Fools Day is just around the corner. As such please could you nominate a new motto or comment on existing suggestions at Motto of the day/Nominations/Specials? Simply south...... facing oncoming traffic for over 5 years 16:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

MotD Nomination for the Opening Ceremony of the London 2012 Olympics (27 July 2012)
We at the Motto of the Day would be extremely grateful if you could review a couple of "special" nominations for the Opening Ceremony of the London 2012 Olympics on the 27th of July 2012. Here is the link to the first nomination, if you can help. The others follow it, and you can add your own ones or improve the existing nominations, of course. Thank you so very much in advance! –p joe f (talk • contribs) 09:46, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: Port Vale
Hi there - I didn't revert any edit to Port Vale - I guess that was someone else? I reverted the edit to PNE (removing the third kit) because the 2013/14 third kit has been announced by the club. Hope that helps! --DaveG12345 (talk) 10:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Re: Port Vale (not)
Wow - I didn't notice the stripes change! And yes, it's correct, so apologies, I didn't mean to revert that bit... :) --DaveG12345 (talk) 12:40, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

West Bromwich Albion F.C. third kit
Hi, I just wanted to check what your source was for the third kit that you added to West Bromwich Albion F.C.? I couldn't find any third kit at http://www.wbashop.co.uk/kits, only home and away. Cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 19:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah OK, thanks. I'm not sure if it is just my monitor, but the 3rd kit on the historical kits page is a sort of deep red, but on the WBAFC Wikipedia page looks like a sort of "T-mobile magenta" or dark pink(!) We might need to adjust the shade a little. --Jameboy (talk) 21:24, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Award
Thank you very much indeed, friend. :) --RichardOwen97 (talk) 00:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of 1PS for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1PS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/1PS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blethering  Scot  21:54, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Manchester United F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phil Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014
Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.

Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * This message has been sent by p joe f on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).

AFC Wimbledon Kits 2014/15
Hi there, I noticed that you were the one who created the templates for the AFC Wimbledon kits last season and you did a really great job on it. I just wanted to know if you would be able to do the same for this season's new kits if you have the time? I would really appreciate it. The designs can be found at the following link. Thanks. --Jodie25 (talk) 11:29, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Water polo
Hey, you deleted my edit with adding stats and the final ranking and i readded it. So, it is better to update it as a whole, the bracket, result and fixtures instead of making 15 mini edits. Kante4 (talk) 21:07, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Award
Thank you! :) --RichardOwen97 (talk) 21:33, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

MK Dons new kit
I see you've been doing lots of kits, so I suspect that you will be a lot faster than me at doing this. The full Dons kit for next season is here, specifically the missing away kit - but I think you also need to check the home and spare kits you've done. Thanks! --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:23, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for quick response and great job. The final new kit has only just been announced. I know what you mean - maybe you can build more! I did it one year by making a full shirt gif, but got into trouble for a copyright vio. I think we aren't allowed to be TOO accurate! --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 21:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Blackpool kit
Think you could make the left hand stripe on the away kit tangerine, per pic.twitter.com/tLqHtqESV6? It's red currently. -  NewTestLeper79  talk  16:55, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

St Mirren away kit
Thanks for your recent contribution to for new St Mirren away kit. I am awful at trying to do the kits, and appreciate your help - but could you alter the kit that you have done? - the current one is slightly different from the alteration you recently made. There is a black and white gradient at the top of the shirt, as shown here.

Would you be able to make it the same as this? Many thanks ;) Andybud (talk) 13:04, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of So Real (band)


The article So Real (band) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article doesn't appear to meet criteria for notability per WP:BAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Random86 (talk) 22:07, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of 1PS for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1PS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/1PS & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Random86 (talk) 00:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited World Professional Darts Championship, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gary Anderson and Phil Taylor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Kits and logos
Hi, I just wanted to inform you that logos on kits are not allowed so please stop adding kits with logos. Sometimes there is a reason why we dont have kits on some articles. Thank you. Qed237&#160;(talk) 16:14, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I don't recall using logos in any of the kits I have updated. I use this solely. There may have been a manufacturer logo once or twice from using the specially-made codes of other kits that happen to match. However, I will keep this in mind for the future, thank you. --RichardOwen97 (talk) 13:27, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * It was in this edit where the kits with logos had been commented out was re-added when you removed the comments. <b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 13:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I see, my bad. Thank you for the reminder and sorry for any inconvenience caused. --RichardOwen97 (talk) 13:36, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * No problem, I was not sure if you knew about the logos so I thought I should inform you. It is all good now. Have a nice day. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 13:41, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Dunfermline Athletic kit
Hi Richard, today you adjusted the kit for Dunfermline Athletic F.C., specifically the sleeves of the home kit. I can see you made a similar edit back on 26 July 2015 and I just wanted to make it clear that the sleeves of the home kit for this season are halved black and white, and not black and white striped as your edits suggest. The images from this article which was posted on the club's website today, shows that the edits you have made are incorrect. I presume the edits were made in good faith, but I just wanted to advise you on the correct pattern for future reference. Thanks :) Exxy (talk) 23:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Oh, so it is :) The reference I use, the sleeves look the same striped and halved; so as the body was striped, I assumed the sleeves were too. I don't remember the first edit; I go through every British kit now and then for updates so the thinking is more robotic than human, haha. Thank you :) --RichardOwen97 (talk) 13:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

San Antonio FC kits
Hi Richard! I saw that you added the kits to the Houston Dynamo's wiki page. Do you mind making the kits for San Antonio FC's page? Kevinkwc (talk) 17:10, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:LutonOldBoys.gif
Thanks for uploading File:LutonOldBoys.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --<span style="font-family: monospace, monospace; color:#69C;">Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 13:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)