User talk:Richard Allen

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Ragib 30 June 2005 23:10 (UTC)
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
 * If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Topical index.

Hi, just dropping by for an explanation of why I reverted your edit to St Pauls, Bristol. If a page duplicates the content of anothe page, one can be set to redirect to the other--see Redirect. If there are two pages on an identical topic but with different content, one should be rewritten to include all of the information, and the other set as a redirect. If you ever spot duplicate pages but don't have time to do this yourself you can add the merge tag to the top of the article or its talk page to alert others. Joe D (t) 23:00, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

Yeti
Thanks for having a go at sorting the structure out on this. I've only added a little and left your major changes unchanged as I think a lot of it is necessary. Its a tough article as it gets vandalised so often its untrue. (Gowron 17:38, 21 October 2006 (UTC))

Longest streets in London
The one mile cut-off is really a bit low. I found six extra roads in a few minutes; I bet there are dozens. I'd suggest two miles at least. It might make sense if you mean to restrict the list to central London, but you clearly don't as you added Lea Bridge Road yourself. RachelBrown 21:06, 10 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Good points Rachel. In central London, a mile long seems quite significant (especially if you have to walk it). Rather than change the length criteria, and to match the article name, I'd rather have a cut off of the top 100 streets. As the 101st entry is added, the  shortest street should be removed from the bottom.  Richard Allen 21:53, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

Pronunciation
It's good to see that you're adding IPA pronunciation to some articles. But you don't need to surround each separate character with the IPA template - it should go round the entire word or phrase (including the brackets). Also please note that SAMPA is now deprecated, and several of us have for some time been removing it wherever we find it &mdash; see Manual of Style (pronunciation) --rossb 21:13, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem RE: Image:William Perkin book.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:William Perkin book.jpg. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law. We need you to specify two things on the image description page:
 * The copyright holder, and
 * The copyright status

The copyright holder is usually the creator. If the creator was paid to make this image, then their employer may be the copyright holder. If several people collaborated, then there may be more than one copyright holder. If you created this image, then you are the copyright holder.

Because of the large number of images on Wikipedia, we've sorted them using image copyright tags. Just find the right tag corresponding to the copyright status of this image, and paste it onto the image description page like this:.

There are 3 basic ways to licence an image on Wikipedia:
 * An open content licence
 * Public Domain
 * Fair Use


 * The copyright holder gets the best protection of their work by licencing it under an open content license such as the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence. If you have the express permission of the copyright holder to licence their work under the above licence, use the image copyright tag: cc-by-sa-2.5. The GNU Free Documentation License is another option. Again, if you have the express permission of the copyright holder, use the tag GFDL.


 * The copyright holder can also release their work into the public domain. See here for examples.


 * Images from certain sources are automatically released into the public domain. This is true for the United States, where the Wikimedia servers are located. (See here for images from the government of the USA and here for other governments.)  However, not all governments release their work into the public domain. One exception is the UK (see here for images from the UK government). Non-free licence governments are listed here.


 * Also, in some cases, an image is copyrighted but allowed on Wikipedia because of fair use. To see a) if this image qualifies, and b) if so, how to tag it, see Fair use.

For more information, see Image copyright tags. Please remember that untagged images are likely to be deleted.

If you have uploaded other images without including copyright tags, please go back and tag them. Also, please tag all images that you upload in the future.

If you have any questions, just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again. --wknight94 02:19, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Richard2003.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Richard2003.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 13:15, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

free use granted
I've updated the inage page to grant GFDL free use Richard Allen 18:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:William Perkin book.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:William Perkin book.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Richard2003.jpg


The file File:Richard2003.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Richard2003.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Richard2003.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hog Farm Bacon 04:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)