User talk:Richard Enfeild

December 2018
Hello, I'm Plandu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Honolulu Museum of Art— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Plandu (talk) 03:35, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Honolulu Museum of Art. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Plandu (talk) 03:37, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Anna Rice Cooke, you may be blocked from editing.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:37, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Count Karl-Wilhelm Finck von Finckenstein.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:37, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 4)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Richard_Enfeild/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

David. moreno 72   04:02, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 05:29, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:LIL ESAPi


A tag has been placed on Draft:LIL ESAPi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. PrussianOwl (talk) 08:44, 7 March 2019 (UTC)