User talk:Richard Johnson fan club

June 2016
Hello, I'm RunnyAmiga. Your recent edit to the page Richard Johnson (wide receiver) appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RunnyAmiga (talk) 23:22, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

I reverted you again
You told me that "All information I am entering is correct and verifiable thru the fan club page. I have posted all info on the fan page..." For whatever reason, you've chosen to reinsert these claims without providing a link to the sources you've collected on Facebook. Saying "News article from la times" is not how to source something. The LA Times has been in business for decades, so they've probably published hundreds of thousands of articles. If you can't point to the specific places you got this information, stop inserting it. RunnyAmiga (talk) 19:07, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
I have supplied articles and dates with newspaper and article links 5 times and invited you to the facebook page that all of thr info has been uploaded to. I have also copied and pasted pertinent articles to support my edits. You guys can fuck off for all I care. I copied the original edit and posted it on another wrbsite so people can actually have the correct info. Screw all of you pricks Please do not add or change content, as you did at Richard Johnson (wide receiver), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''If there are articles that support your assertions, you need to cite them when you make the changes. You didn't provide any links, article titles, or the like.'' —C.Fred (talk) 21:18, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Johnson (wide receiver), you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Richard Johnson (wide receiver) was changed by Richard Johnson fan club (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952826 on 2016-06-04T21:21:34+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, Richard Johnson fan club, does not meet our username policy. '''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.''' A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Widr (talk) 21:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)