User talk:Richard Keatinge/Archives/2010/February 2010

{{Chronological talk archive|%F %Y}

Annoyed
Actually more than annoyed, seriously pissed off. First of all you assert that my opposition to mention of San Roque is rooted in a dislike of Spanish nationalism, when it isn't. Now today apparently I "object to any mention of San Roque on grounds which I find not relevant to Wikipedia". Sorry but thats bullshit and has never ever been the case. I've consistently argued that its a minor detail relevant to the history article and not to an overview. I have from Day 1 agreed that it is worth mentioning in the right context. I am fed up my comments deliberately being miscrepresented by the likes of Imalbornoz and I really did not expect you to do the same. Those comments are out of order.

The only reason that Spanish nationalism ever got mentioned is that Imalbornoz frequently claims he doesn't support it, yet advances the same arguments all the time. Some of his comments off-wiki are also very offensive in that respect. Justin talk 13:18, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

JzG
I can't see JzG being a great deal of help, seeing as he managed to wade in without understanding and make things worse. Atama has been more instrumental in mediating matters. It might have been courtesy to have invited him. Justin talk 13:17, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I shall, and possibly others who have shown recent interest. Feel free to do the same. Richard Keatinge (talk) 13:51, 4 February 2010 (UTC)