User talk:Richard Keatinge/Archives/2011/April 2011

{{Chronological talk archive|%F %Y}

Sources?
So what sources do you actually have? I've asked you many times what your sources are. You never reply. If you're referring to Ecemaml's carefully selected quotes, those are not sources. As noted at WP:RSN

Editors are not allowed to use material from sources they have not seen. If they have not seen the sources — complete and with the material or quote in its full context, none of this "snippet" nonsense — then they cannot use them. If they don't have (have not seen) such sources as are authoritative for that topic then I would question their competence to do any substantial editing of the article.

If you've bought some books, great, care to share what you've got and ideally when you bought them? Wee Curry Monster talk 16:32, 1 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I had a fair selection from the library last year. They went back when you had time out. I've now re-accumulated some and am getting more, being careful to say where I got things - you may have noticed some specific disclaimers. I hope this helps. Richard Keatinge (talk) 16:56, 1 April 2011 (UTC)


 * No it does not, this is supposed to be an open co-operative project and unless you're open with how you are sourcing material it helps not one jot. I don't see why you wouldn't name your sources.  You see having an extensive library I am dumb founded at the claim your edit gives due weight to the events of 1704.  Wee Curry Monster talk 20:26, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Please Self-Revert
You didn't even wait for my explanation before reverting, you cannot possibly believe that your revert has improved the article. Please self-revert. Wee Curry Monster talk 12:02, 8 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Shall we try to keep this on the relevant talk page? Richard Keatinge (talk) 12:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:33, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Arbitration Enforcement
Note that you have been mentioned in a request for arbitration enforcement here. Pfainuk talk 21:04, 22 April 2011 (UTC)