User talk:Richard Keatinge/Archives/2011/January 2011

{{Chronological talk archive|%F %Y}

Borrowed a leaf from your book
I've borrowed a tactic of yours that you used to settle matters in the Timeline article on the Tireless episode. I've simply eliminated all the text subject to neutrality concerns and it has to be noted that the article is no worse for it. I do hope you will support this. Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 01:33, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I am disappointed at your response, see for the inspiration and particularly the sentiments behind it.  Was this not a better place to start to build from?  Wee Curry Monster talk 13:57, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Moving forward on Gibraltar
I make a proposal for a process and conditions to move forward. You are invited to share your thoughts and participate in the discussion. Cheers! --Vassyana (talk) 19:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Talk:Gibraltar

Mediation Cabal case
You have been named as a party in a case before the Mediation Cabal. Please indicate there whether you accept the process of mediation. All parties must agree for the process to move forward. Best regards, Lord Roem (talk) 05:06, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion
May I suggest in mind of Talk:Gibraltar that you reconsider your comments. Wee Curry Monster talk 22:32, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

your opening statement includes two past quotes from User:Gibnews, who is currently topic banned and unable to defend himself. I also consider it unhelpful to continually refer to past bad tempered discussions and have repeatedly asked you to stop doing so. I suggest that referring to past conduct is hardly helpful or relevant in mediation, which should be focused on content. May I suggest you redact that part of your statement that is referring to past user conduct. Wee Curry Monster talk 13:16, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


 * It's actually meant to illustrate the strength of feelings about the issue, for which it seems quite appropriate. As you say it's not about the conduct of a current party to the discussion. Richard Keatinge (talk) 16:36, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


 * No it can all too easily be taken to imply that motivation in those involved in the mediation case and to imply bad faith as a result. Again I am asking for the fourth and final time for you to redact them.  Wee Curry Monster talk 20:19, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry to refuse, but thanks for the opportunity to make clear that I mean absolutely no implication of bad faith and have been careful to avoid any quotations from those presently involved. The diffs are, I think, quite good at showing the strength of feelings involved. Richard Keatinge (talk) 23:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:29, 21 January 2011 (UTC)