User talk:Richardlord49

{| style="background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;" cellpadding="0" Coffeepusher (talk) 16:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * style="border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;"|

Hi, I wanted to take a moment and explain myself. You recently made an edit to the Foucult page, and I undid it. However this wasn't because what you wrote was wrong or poor. It appeared to be Origional Reserch, meaning it didn't contain any references to reliable sources. If you have such sources, feel free to add it back with them contained within. additionaly, somewhere (I can't remember where) in the links above there is a section on how to scite sources for wikipedia. If you have any questions feel free to contact me and I would be glad to help. Coffeepusher (talk) 16:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Foucault
Sorry, your edit to Foucault is grammatically incoherent and completely uncited. You must cite in order for your inclusions to be seen as valid, and all edits must be grammatically sound. Thank you. If you need any help, feel free to ask. Icarus of old (talk) 17:41, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Once again, your addition has many grammatical errors, and your attempt at citation does not follow Wikipedia standards. Please familiarize yourself with proper grammar and citation and then add the information. You MUST prove your information properly, not just if someone challenges you. And once again, if you need help, FEEL FREE TO ASK instead of adding the same old stuff, which is poorly-written and uncited. Thank you.Icarus of old (talk) 18:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Knowledge Base/Knowledge Acquisition
Knowledge Based/Knowledge Acquisition

A newly formed conceptual (a neologism concept) concept which most certainly requires more work on its exact definition and working area.In the first place it places great emphasis on societies relationship with knowledge gathering and knowledge dissemination.Also it concentrates on society’s emphasis on the “exact” sciences and the various structural (or codes) content which enables the “exact” or "hard" sciences to claim “truth” within its given field or topic.Its then relationship within that society(the exact science) and those who propagate these truths.

1 Mathematics

1.1Differential Topology 1.2Differential Geometry 1.3Differential Algebra 1.4Differential Calculus

2 Physics

2.1 Particle Physics 2.2 Theoretical Physics

3 Chemistry

4 Evolutionary Biology

1.1Differential Topology

It is hard describe Differential Topology but in the first case it is not mathematics as we know it.In an Knowledge Base/Knowledge Acquisition society we have four different disciplines each with its own codes and secrets.It is these codes which the concept of Knowledge Base/Knowledge Acquisition seeks to lay bear.

Philip Burlamachi(d.1642)
Orginally from Sedan who spent the best part of 30 years in England as an financial intermediary to the King of England,of Italian origin,although born in Sedan in France who’s idea of a bank was the first known word for bank.He presented his idea in 1636 where 'a bank for payment of all large sums which shall be negotiated'.Some 28 years later in 1694 the Bank of England was formed which ultamately led to what we now know as Capitalism.

I'm trying to write at least 2 articles their will be more and I can't get started I've tried the link and that does'nt work.What can I do?Richardlord49 (talk) 10:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Type the name of the article you want to start in the search/go box and click start this page. Tombomp (talk/contribs) 10:50, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

wIKIPEDIA Won't let me create my own user page.I have an account.How do get my own user page?It seems as if Wikipedia don't want anyone to write any serious articles and IT IS NOT USER FRIEDLY.WHY?Richardlord49 (talk) 10:51, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Click the thing that says "User page", next to discussion at the top. Tombomp (talk/contribs) 11:03, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

I've tried the search and go option by putting the name of the person still does'nt work.Richardlord49 (talk) 10:55, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * If you've noticed the "Red Links" those are pages that HAVEN'T been created yet. There is a page for Mr. Burlamachi. See here: Philip Burlamachi. Thanks! Neuro √ Logic  14:09, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

I've tried everything the search and go option it still won't let me create my own article I cannot phone anyone to ask them any questions.It is frustrating. Richardlord49 (talk) 11:04, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * See Above, Thanks! Neuro √ Logic  14:09, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

I've tried the user page tab and all you get is a box with open,save,cancel.Richardlord49 (talk) 11:08, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * That "Open Save Cancel" page, IS how you CREATE or EDIT a Wikipedia page! =) You're on the right track! Neuro √ Logic  14:09, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

My user page is always in red.Why?It won't let me create my own user page?Why?Richardlord49 (talk) 11:16, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * See Above, Thanks! Neuro √ Logic  14:09, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

I've noticed know one has come and at least tried to help me on this matter.Wikipedia is not user friendly.I'm serious academic writter and would like to be taken seriously.Richardlord49 (talk) 11:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Richard! If you'll read Tutorial you'll see that creation of an article is a very simple matter! =) Clicking on User:Richardlord49 will open the page to edit. If you're not familiar with Wikimarkup language, you can read all about it in the above template, outlining features and such for new members! Happy editing! Neuro √ Logic  14:03, 23 August 2008 (UTC)