User talk:Richbegelfer

I have written the now correct encyclopedic reference for Universal Express, USXP and Riachard A. Altomare. I have listed what is true and accurate and fully documentable. I did so without removing the untrue and liablous entry made previously by others. It is amazing to me that people like John Nevard seem to think that by attempting to remove the truth abouth the government conspiracy against USXP and Richard Altomare will somehow make it seem as though it never happened or was justified.

Mr. Nevard, rather than deleting my entries, why not follow all the reference materials, and truly educate yourself about what really happened to Universal Express and Richard Altomare. The initial entry on this topic made nothing less than slanderous allegations about USXP and Richard Altomare and attempted to substantiate it with a few references to the court records of Judge Lynch's actions as directed by and sanctioned by the SEC. Read the reference materials including all the rest of all the court documents about this case and be educated of the full truth here.

I am an authority on this case and would be happy to enter any forum with you to debate these issues. But PLEASE! do us all a favor and act responsibly. Do not simply "undo" what you do not understand or are ignorant about. Prove me wrong using real evidence as I am now posting and will continue to post as I sort through the mountain of materials available which clearly show the SEC had no choice but to do their best to shut Altomare up years ago. If they hadn't ... Madoff would have gone down much sooner and thousands of American companies would have been saved and millions of American and foregin investors would still have their stocks and their money.

Clearly, you do not fully grasp what has happened here. I'd be happy to educate you if you will act in a mature fashion and allow both sides of this issue the light of day. This accurate and truthful posting will continue to be put back up every time an attempt is made to silence this truth. So, please stop wasting everyone's time trying to hide this.

Richard Begelfer

April 2011
This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Universal Express, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Naked short selling. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. This request is predicated on the similarity between your user name and the name of the editor of the "sold short" book. Figureofnine (talk) 14:33, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Universal Express, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please do not add text sourced to "Sold Short in America," a self-published book. '' Figureofnine (talk) 19:31, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:32, 6 June 2011 (UTC)