User talk:Richhandy

Harry Potter dates
While we appreciate your contributions, please stop adding purely speculative dates relating to the Harry Potter books to the Days of the Year articles. First off, they're fictional characters; secondly, the claims are unsourced, and lastly, they're tied to specific years -- something which I've never heard attributed officially to any of the books. I'm afraid I'll have to revert all of them. --CalendarWatcher 22:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

The existence of a 'Fiction' section -- which I'm leery of to begin with -- isn't carte blanche to include every trivial event in one particular series of books, especially in attributing exact years to them. --CalendarWatcher 22:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I mean to go through and delete the fiction section for most days, since such entries would have to be extraordinarily relevant to be worth including. The main event for Back to the Future, since it explicitly concerns and revolves around very specific and emphasized dates. And when I have time, the same thought ought to apply to the various Year articles, as I'm tired of seeing a random assortment of video games set in some randomly chosen and otherwise insignificant near-future dates. --CalendarWatcher 22:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

And if you'll look, you'll note that I'm not the only one reverting these additions: I count at least two others, working independently, doing the same. --CalendarWatcher 22:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC)