User talk:Richkahn

Hello. Can you please go back to your Ecopedagogy article, which you helped create, and re-write it using language appropriate to a general audience? The terms you are using are far too technical, and as a result the article is generally incomprehensible.

Also, you may want to edit your Richard V. Kahn and Steven Best articles to provide more proof of their notability (see WP:N and WP:BIO for help with that). As it stands, I don't think those articles will survive a deletion review. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 16:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Douglas Kellner


The article Douglas Kellner has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Very few sources cited. Reads more like a advert than an encyclopaedic article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Mdann 52   talk to me!  13:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC)