User talk:Richmondian

Just my views
I like what you wrote about that rape article. Unfortunately it is true that PC has skewed NPOV of some articles. Your best bet though is not to start problems with editors/admins, but to work within the system by building up a network of editors/admins who like you and support you. For people to take you seriously, write a few articles about serious topics about a historical event or figure and not a videogame or pop singer. Otherwise articles like that rape case will never represent what really happen. I got a 1/2 dozen original articles under my belt and probably close to 1000 edits, and i got reverted with a slap in face referencing LA Times. Need a large team. It is much more difficult for the PC forces to rewrite history when a large team with proven track record opposes it. u need allies who are admins, unless u plan on getting banned, the way u talk. my point is, stop beefing, and start meeting people. but most important write original content. Meishern (talk) 16:28, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi all. I've been asked to review this case by a number of editors. Just unprotecting for the moment, if that's okay. Feel free to re-protect if needs be - A l is o n  ❤ 10:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Unblocked
As per Alison's findings now posted in their new location at Sockpuppet investigations/Brucejenner, I have unblocked your account. I would like to personally apologise for any inconvenience caused. Best, Peter Symonds ( talk ) 11:24, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

That was a bit unpleasant. Sorry I wasn't about to slow down the process. I may or may not agree with you, but you don't seem like the kind of person who would be trying to game the system. I hope that this doesn't drive you away, as I think there are more articles that could use the kind of focus you bring to help sort out the sticky issues around victims, accused criminals, and such. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 23:41, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Ed Jew
Since you refuse to start a discussion, I'll start it here. I don't understand why you kept on inserting the 26% thing in the article. I've told you tons of time that this little fact is not notable and shouldn't be in the article. What readers really need to know is that he won the election with 52% total votes. Who care if he only got 26% first round votes? I began to think that you are trying to diminish the fact that he won the election with a clear majority.— Chris! c / t 23:03, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, please don't call edits you disagree with as trolling. That is a clear breach of No personal attacks.— Chris! c / t 23:05, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

I think you have some misunderstanding with this particular voting system. The 52% is not meaningless because that is the final votes he got at the final round. He needs to have at least 50+1% to win otherwise he couldn't have won. The 26% is those who vote for him first choice, and it doesn't include second or third choice. The article you linked is an opinion piece and it omitted the fact there are second or third choice votes. Either the writer misunderstood or the writer was purposely trying to express an opinion. If you want to say meaningless, the 26% is the one because that is not the final votes he got in order to win.

With that said, I am willing to compromise. We can mention in the body that he got 26% in the first round and that the 52% is what he got at the end.— Chris! c / t 20:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

American Indian Model Schools
Hi! I rewrote the American Indian content at American Indian Model Schools WhisperToMe (talk) 21:12, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michelle Le


The article Michelle Le has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Per WP:VICTIM and WP:BLP1E, this should be a page on her disappearance, not the individual, if the crime is a well-documented historic event (which that I would question too).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 21:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Michelle Le for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michelle Le is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Michelle Le until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Inks.LWC (talk) 22:17, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Man with electric shock baton image

 * Please resume discussion on this query, at Talk:Electroshock weapon. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:18, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Murder of Michelle Le for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Michelle Le is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Murder of Michelle Le until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ...William 02:17, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

American Indian Model Schools
Hi, Richmondian! I wanted to check up and see how the American Indian Model Schools article is doing, then I realize you undid the redirect I started - I had more or less recreated the same article at the new location. I did not anticipate the merge being controversial.

The "AIM schools" are both a part of the same system. They are both like one school. There isn't much of a difference between the campuses. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:44, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Binh Thai Luc


The article Binh Thai Luc has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I have BLP concerns about this article. When a person is only accused of a crime, not convicted, the standards at WP:CRIMINAL suggest that an article about the person should not be created. Additional concerns are WP:NOTNEWS and lack of sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --MelanieN (talk) 05:00, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:AIPCS ethnicities.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:30, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

American-led intervention in Syria Neutrality
After tagging the article American-led intervention in Syria as not being neutral, it'd be appreciated if you explained your reasoning for tagging it on the article talk page. - SantiLak  (talk) 01:41, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)