User talk:Richter1926

Conflict of interest policy
Hello, Richter1926. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
 * instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the template);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 14:24, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Ronz, Thank you for your concern. I was in no means trying to create conflict, we just wanted to make sure the information (and more importantly, name of the company!) is correct and up-to-date. Are the changes now made ok? thank you
 * Thanks for responding. Please review WP:COI. I only looked briefly at the article and your edits, noticing the obvious coi and the lack of sources. I don't expect it will be a problem to improve the article so it more closely follows Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.--Ronz (talk) 16:33, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Ronz, A few more citations and references have been added and up-dated.
 * Thanks. I try to find some time to review the article and sources closely. --Ronz (talk) 15:10, 3 October 2015 (UTC)