User talk:RichyG

Hi. The editing you've been doing on the Morgellons page is proving to be disruptive, highly POV, and you have been repeatedly inserting links that have already been discussed and tagged as inappropriate for inclusion in the article. If you wish to make wholesale changes to the page, then you really do need to read WP:NPOV first, then go to the discussion page and discuss the changes you want to make before you make them, give specific reasons WHY you feel they should be made, and convince the other editors that your edits are an improvement. THAT is how Wikipedia is supposed to work, especially in an article on a controversial topic. You'll notice that even though Ward and I disagree, we still discuss things when changes are being proposed. As for Randy Wymore's interview at MorgellonsUSA.com, they are not a news agency, so that is not news. It is propaganda, and WP:NOT policies make it clear that such things are not appropriate. If you care to QUOTE Dr. Wymore, then how about bringing it up on the discussion page, suggest which quote you'd like to add, and then we'll see if there's a proper place to insert the quote into the article. Bear in mind that this would mean adding a quote and not deleting quotes or citations from other individuals, as you have been doing. Those sorts of edits are not constructive, and violate WP:NPOV. Dyanega 01:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

agree with Dyanega
We all don't see things the same way so there has to be some negotiation and discussion or there are endless edit wars where edits are simply reverted and the article goes nowhere. Wikipedia is highly structured in behavior so if an administer feels you are being disruptive you can be blocked and that will be even more frustrating for you.

Ward20 07:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)