User talk:Rick jens

Welcome!

Hello, Rick jens, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Professor hand chopped off Kerala, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 02:10, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Your contributed article, Professor hand chopped off Kerala
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Professor hand chopped off Kerala. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - T J Joseph. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at T J Joseph - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 02:10, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Your addition to Love Jihad has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ''The content you placed was pasted verbatim from. I'm afraid this is not consistent with Wikipedia's Term of Use.'' Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

WQA
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Phoon (talk) 09:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Rick, could you please address the concerns addressed here? --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 15:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you Fiftytwo thirty and Phoon. I responded.Rick jens (talk) 19:44, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Hey Rick -- I (finally) got back to you and other parties involved at WP:WQA. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:52, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Please read the discussion page before reverting
Please read the comments before reverting. Participate in the discussion before deleting others edits. Thanks for your understanding -- Indiashines (talk) 17:40, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Popular Front of India
I rolled back your recent additions, some of the material seems reasonable, but your recasting of the lead seemed to me to violate WP:UNDUE and a bit pointy. Please discuss the changes you'd like to make on the article's talk page. I see also that you've been working on drafts on the talk page, that's really not the best place for it, it's better to do your work in a sandbox and then bring it to discussion. Lastly, please do sign your posts on the talk page with four tildes. Thanks, --Nuujinn (talk) 23:47, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I have not added any new information. These are the materials which have been discussed, properly cited from credible sources. If you further remove properly cited references and statements i would have to complain to wikipeida administrations about your conduct.
 * Sections have been added to talk page so that credible editors can see the verifiability and credibility of links as many employees of Popular Front of India are hijacking the article.
 * Also peacock has been added to sections which are pure advertisement.


 * If you have any issues with my edits i request you to talk to an administration or raise that on the articles talk page. Thanks for your time.Rick jens (talk) 15:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok, but will you at least please go back to the Popular Front of India talk page and both sign your posts and explain what your intent is by posting drafts? It is not clear what your intent is, and you do not appear to be trying to engage other editors in discussion. I will be happy to discuss changes with you on the talk page, but your proposed lead is entirely too one sided. --Nuujinn (talk) 16:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)