User talk:RickinBaltimore/Archive 16

[Panchkula Shopper]
Respected Sir I would request that you un delete the page Panchkula Shopper. it is a 23 year old magazine that was founded by Mr Ashwani Tuli. I create this page with natural process. If there is any un natural contant, i will work on it and make it correct Thank You
 * It was advertising and there was nothing in the article that stated why it was notable, nor why it was sourced. Regardless if it was created with "natural process", it's not a subject that meets our WP:GNG. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:09, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

EJIDA Studios
You win, just keep it deleted, but just send me the article, ok?Superpilot123456 (talk) 12:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Revive the content of my deleted page
Hi RickinBaltimore. Please can you send me my content I have now lost on the page you deleted? The page was: Hottinger Group Hilly150 (talk) 10:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Hilly, I've done so in your sandbox here: User:Hilly150/Sandbox. Please note that you will want to remove the promotional material, and ensure that if you want this to be published, that the article meets our standards for inclusion. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:00, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

About OmarGosh
Hello, you deleted my article on OmarGosh. You deleted it because you it had already been deleted in the past, but I added several new relevant sources, which was the initial issue with the page. Please reupload the page, thank you! User: MrProEdits (talk) 14:40, 1 March 2017 (UTC)MrProEdits
 * It looks like the article exists here OmarGoshTV. RickinBaltimore (talk) 01:54, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

PNO Consultants
This company is the largest in the sector and features in multiple press-releases, and European Commission statements as well as has significant activity into the roadmapping and policy making for the European Union. We would like to make the related page but you deleted it before we could start all the highly relevant, encyclopedia needed information. Do you mind stop unilaterally deleting it please? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fgmartinelli (talk • contribs) 20:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The article at the time of it's deletion had no references, other to it's own website. This was not a "unilateral deletion", but an examination of the page, and it did not appear to be notable. Also, saying "we would like to make the page" makes it sound that this account is a shared account which is explictly against Wikipedia guidelines. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Dear RickinBaltimore. Thank you for your reply. Now i understand the misunderstanding (btw: this is my personal account, private and individual). Indeed the company is highly noteworthy, as as said its strongly involved into the defining of policy making at CONTINENTAL scale (European Union). Several references are available: 2.	PNO has demonstrated track record of winning the largest and most difficult BBI grants, the so called Flagships (>20 Million EUR/grant), among others: the publicly available one BIOSKOH BBI 2015: a.	http://www.bbi-europe.eu/projects/bioskoh b.	http://www.pnoconsultants.com/innovation-services/projects/bioskoh 4.	PNO carried out a study paid by the BIC/BBI itself to investigate synergies for BBI funding and structural funding for the bioeconomy, Combining BBI (H2020) and European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) to deploy the European bioeconomy: http://www.bbi-europe.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Guidelines_BBI-ESIF-Final.pdf 5.	PNO is strongly integrated in the overall “pan-EU BioEconomy stakeholders community" as peer with proven track record of bioeconomy-relevant non-BBI assignments such as for example: a.	European Commission DG GROW Biobased Products public procurement study (main contractor): http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/newsroom/cf/itemdetail.cfm?item_id=8767 b.	European Commission DG GROW Model Demonstrator Regions for sustainable chemicals production (second largest contractor): European Commission DG GROW: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/newsroom/cf/itemdetail.cfm?item_id=8436 c.	Pan-EU bottom-up Vanguard Initiative: BioEconomy Pilot (main contractor): http://www.s3vanguardinitiative.eu/cooperations/bio-economy-interregional-cooperation-innovative-use-non-food-biomass d.	Several Horizon 2020 and FP7 BioEconomy funded projects, as visible from the official EU funded project database: CORDIS: http://cordis.europa.eu/search/result_en?q=(organization/legalName%3D%27PNO%27%20OR%20organization/shortName%3D%27PNO%27)%20AND%20contenttype%3D%27project%27&searchType=advanced

Finally PNO has also a strong track record on Water, including being hired by the “European water lobby / technology platform” to build their vision: http://wsstp.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/102/2016/07/WssTP-Water-Vision-2030_preprint-version.pdf / as well as process industry: https://www.spire2030.eu/uploads/Modules/Publications/spire-roadmap_december_2013_pbp.pdf

As said, we are talking about a company of Eu-wide relevance in terms of stimulating and influencing innovation within the fields of AGRO, Chemistry, Water and Process Industry. I hope you can now concur that the links above (that should have been added to the original page) prove the point. Could you please revert the deletion now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fgmartinelli (talk • contribs) 13:19, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

About article
Hello, you deleted the article on Marton Kovacs I produced. You deleted it because you said it was already once deleted in the past after discussion. I have however added several new information and sources. In addition, I have explained why the changes were significant in the talk section of Marton Kovacs. Now everything I wrote is gone. Can you explain why you have deleted everything without responding to the arguments I presented in the talk section. Also, can you please reinstate the article or send me at least the content of the article and the talk page. User: StudentMadrid (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)StudentMadrid

About Kibrit Creative
Hi Dear Rİckin, as you can see there are many of Animation studios are listed on Animation studios. Please do not delete this page Kibrit Creative solutions"  sincerely (Oliviadurak (talk) 16:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)).

My bad
Thanks for fixing that tag I goofed up on. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 20:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem! RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

I'm an idiot
LOL, I was about to revert it myself. Thanks.Slatersteven (talk) 18:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries! It happens to the best of us. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

User Talk
You have recently deleted a page while I was updating it and adding reasons why it should not be deleted. Daddy310 (talk) 20:04, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Jagatpur Union
Union isn't any club, you haven't checked the Talk page with two protests.Xx236 (talk) 06:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Ugh. That's what I get for not looking at it properly. It is an unreferenced stub, however I'll restore the page for you or whoever to work on. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Appreciation
Thank you for your contributions towards building a quality, and fraud free Wikipedia for all of us, the work isn't easy, we know this, and that is why, we are thankful ! Celestina007 (talk) 19:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Why thank you for the kind words! RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

WP:ANI
Hey I added a comment after the thread was closed, you may want to take a look at it. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 23:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * just saw it, and honestly I'm pretty sure there isn't much a CU can do. If they edit with an IP the same way, it'll be easy to point out I'm sure. RickinBaltimore (talk) 02:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Duplicate accounts
If I had to guess- someone who's locked themselves out of the account they created 36 minutes previously :) I've tried asking, but, presuming they're in the subcontinent, it's about 8PM there. Cheers, O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  14:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * User talk:Romjadhav, registered today @12:54, created User:Romjadhav/sandbox/Prathamesh Jadhav;
 * User:Prathamesh Jadhav Nerul, registered today @13:30, created user page with sandbox article above.
 * Both pages are U5 worthy too I'd say. I'll keep an eye out, if it's a simple lock out, no big deal. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * At your command, Megatron! -U5 it is. I was so busy wondering what to do about their dup acounts, I forgot that's how I'd found them in the first place! Cheers, O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  14:40, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll keep an eye out like I said, pages were deleted, so there is that. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:00, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * FYI, return of User:Romjadhav. Cheers, O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  15:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Creating Asura
I have created Asura (2018 film), which you had deleted on November 23 as it was created by a blocked user. Please go through the article and let me know if you have any issues with it.  Jupitus Smart  15:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me! RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:56, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Ali Khaliqi
(talk) hello Dear Rikin, Sorry but I wanted explain you the page Ali khaliqi that i make today and you deleted was not ads page it was belong to an great artist of carpet design and he doesn't have any benefit on that, he is quite famous in Carpet design and his name is everywhere that's why we as his ex students decide to create his page in wiki. could you please recheck or guide me how we can confirm it? thank you for advance (Kobi41 (talk) 15:03, 14 February 2017 (UTC))
 * The issue is that he does not meet our notability guidelines for a subject on Wikipedia. You have to show that he does through independent reliable sources that can back your claims up. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

(talk)Thank you so much ok I will do it one by one and how can I correct them without remake the same page? (Kobi41 (talk) 15:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)).
 * I'd suggest working in your draft space first. If the article looks like it might be ready to go, try going through the articles for creation process, and it can be published through there. This also gives other editors the ability to look at the page and see that it's worthy of publication. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

(talk)Ok thank you for your guid. I will do it (Kobi41 (talk) 16:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC))

Thank you
Hello, RickinBaltimore. I want to thank you for your quick response for blocking User:Channel Manda. Regards. Tiktomoro (talk) 18:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem! RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

question
You have recently deleted a page called Dr.molrok this should have been an english version  of an german wiki entry. can you please explain how i can set on a english version according to the terms ,to get the original page been recognized internationally ?! thanks (Denbenutzernamengibtesnochnicht (talk) 20:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC))
 * The issue with the page is that it didn't appear that he met the general notability guidelines. If you want to work on the page, I'd suggest perhaps working in your sandbox first, and try to get the page set up with the information needed to show how he is notable. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

I would like to know why my page that was not duplicating anything was deleted MaxMischief (talk) 15:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

The definition of duplication is exactly like something else. Exactly has synonyms which are in every aspect, in every way, too name a few. My page List Of Current Car Brands was very different from the manufacturers list. It did not have dates as the other one did, it had a more accurate list. Im just curious as to the controversial power that wikipedia seems to beleive is just when its editors don't know the definitions of words. MaxMischief (talk) 15:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The list however was the same as the list on List_of_automobile_manufacturers. Even with adding dates, it was the same information. This is why it was deleted via A10. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:00, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

How is Christopher Duntsch not notable?
Can you explain why you think Christopher Duntsch is not notable? There are more than 20,000 results on google for his name and he is the subject of major investigations and lawsuits. Natureium (talk) 20:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The article originally was tagged for deletion for being an attack page, however the term "Dr. Death" is being used in the media and it appears that an attack page didn't apply. That being said, this may be something where WP:BLP1E applies, as while he is getting coverage for this trial, and specifically "If that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual. Biographies in these cases can give undue weight to the event and conflict with neutral point of view. In such cases, it is usually better to merge the information and redirect the person's name to the event article." I think this section of WP:BLP1E would apply in this case. You're more that welcome however to go to WP:DELREV for a further consensus on the matter. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Ok then,

Deletion review for Christopher Duntsch
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Christopher Duntsch. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Natureium (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Mess
Could you please solve the mess here? "Please" ask this "slow on the draw" editor if he Srednuas Lenoroc who created a new account or a seperate editor whose username is very similar to Srednuas Lenoroc. We have been asking the same question again and again...but he does not give a simple, clear answer. His confusing, blurred responses cause a real mess. If he keep continuing such blurred responses, instead of giving a simple, clear answer, please block him. Because this mess is really trolling the previous cases. 46.221.219.63 (talk) 09:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I see that they have had multiple editors asking what is going on. I'm watching both AN/I and the SPI to see what comes next. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Could you please comment on here? And it would be nice if close and archieve the SPI case which was submitted by Sir Sputnik yesterday, regarding the same editor. Because it created a mess and the previous case seems being trolled because of it. 46.221.178.57 (talk) 16:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Dr Rajlakshmi sj
Hey please review deletion of page Dr Rajlakshmi sj — Preceding unsigned comment added by TUSHAR KARMARKAR (talk • contribs) 14:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I have reviewed the page and they do not meet our guidelines of notability. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

But can I ask you why Rickin? There is enough on google, google news, google images and google videos about her. She has inspired thousands of disabled India. Prominent mainstream media like Times of India (highest circulated daily in India) have also written on her. If small small villages and every individual one time local body elected politician can be there on Wikipedia, why can't somebody so inspirational and who is not even distantly related to me. Still you deleted.please reply
 * Again, you need to read over WP:N. I did a Google search on her, and the first hit is her personal website. There is a story about her in Times of India, but that is it. One story isn't enough, especially since it appears to be the only real in depth info about her. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

User talk:The Hell World
This is a sock puppet of and they always post inappropriate unblock requests when blocked when talk page access is not revoked. Please revoke talk page access. —MRD2014 📞 What I've done 14:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Widr got it. Never mind. —MRD2014 📞 What I've done 14:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I didn't catch that when I blocked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

AIV decline
Greetings, Rick: I don't believe we have interacted before. I happened to see that you had declined this report, about this user. I would not have blocked at that point either, so I have no quarrel with the outcome of the decision; but I did want to say that given that it was a) a registered account, b) an issue with promotional editing, and c) a report suggesting a spam-only account, the report being stale really does not enter into the picture, does it? A spambot is a spambot, whether an hour old or a month old. Indeed I'd be more wary of older accounts producing spam, as these receive less scrutiny; so TL:DR, declining it as "stale" was probably not the best move. Of course it's possible that you saw something there that I did not, but I thought I'd leave you a note in any case. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 15:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comment! I understand what you were saying, I used the stale option because it seemed to be the best reasoning as to why I was hesitant to block the account. (Though had I been up during the time they were editing, I'd likely had blocked it). RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:09, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank You So Much
Even though I am a Milwaukee Wave Fan.... I really appreciate your edits to the MASL wiki, keep up the good work! JRizzle867 (talk) 15:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you, it's been one of my favorite sports to follow since the original MISL in the 80's. (And what a great rivalry the Blast and Wave have had!) RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Re-creation of Ekopedia article (after its deletion)
Hello, I believe the Ekopedia article was deleted because Ekopedia went off line ... is it OK to recreate it now that it's back online again (at least for the french project which was the biggest project anyway) ? ... I can also add links (see http://www.appropedia.org/Ekopedia ) If I have time - Thanks for your help ! --Pierro78 (talk) 16:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The page wasn't deleted because the site was off line, it was deleted because it did not meet WP:GNG, and did not have independent reliable sources to show how it was notable. If you want to start working on it, I'd suggest start in your sandbox as a draft article, get the sources to show why it's notable and go from there. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Why thank you!! RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Alden Ritchey
CAN YOU PLEASE UN DELETE my page? You did it and it wasn't cool.Notabimbo (talk) 20:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * You've not given a valid reason why it should be undeleted. As noted in the (now deleted) article, there isn't much known about this person. I think you need to read Notability (people). Nothing in that article made any claim whatsoever as to the supposed fame of this person. Sorry. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * To add to that, while he sounds like he is an important person to you, unfortunately that isn't enough to warrant an article on Wikipedia. As Hammersoft said previously, we have a set of guidelines that people need to meet to have an article. If you can show how they meet this, through what we call independent reliable sources, then his article would be kept from deletion. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Aika Tappaa
This page should not have been speedy-deleted as G4. Following the userfication by admin User:MichaelQSchmidt, User:Dr. Blofeld added a new section, with new sources, to the userfied text, then moved it back to mainspace. (MQS may not have userfied the article properly, but that problem could have by solved by a histmerge). The G4-deleted text was not substantially identical to the AFD-deleted text, and G4-deletion was therefore incorrect. Please restore the article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 21:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Done, and restored. Let me know if I missed anything. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). (talk) 22:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * And I too can say "thank you" to you .  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 20:20, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

OrangeSkunk
Thanks for cleaning up that mess... Could you also delete User:OrangeSkunk/False Edits? (unless you see some sort of reason to keep it...) Thanks! 172.56.39.33 (talk) 22:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

DronStudy
You deleted this article twice now. It's been recreated today; could you take a look and see if it's any better? Sources 1, 4, and 5 don't mention the subject at all, while source 3 is a blog. Source 2 seems reliable, but could be a press release. Thoughts? O Fortuna! ...Imperatrix mundi.  17:00, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Source #2 comes from "PRNewswire", which is a press release, correct. As you said 1, 4 and 5 make no mention of the subject, and the 3rd source is "Yourstory.com", which again is a blog site. I'm deleting it, again. Might need to be salted though. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. Yep, don't think the vista is particularly improved by its presence ;)  O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  17:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

156.3.55.95


Did you mean to perform a short block on this one...? The previous one was for 2 months. Regards. 172.58.40.6 (talk) 18:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I swore I set it for 6 months. Thanks, adjusted it now. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Hello
You deleted my "Chase Johnsey" page. Does the NY Times count as a reliable source? What about 2 major awards. Now, I can no longer edit the page. What shall I do to continue working on this page? - dchaissejohnsier — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dchaissejohnsier (talk • contribs) 03:26, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I see that you are working on it here Draft:Chase Johnsey (Ballet Dancer), however the draft was declined because it does not have sourcing to show why the subject is notable. If you do have a NY Times piece, you would need to add it to this article. Also, since this appears to be an article about you, I would read over WP:AUTO, as writing an autobiography is STRONGLY discouraged. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Am I reading to much into
This? Particularly March 27- edit summaries such as 'continue cleanup - see talk' and 'notable sufficiently entries' are almost identical. O Fortuna! ...Imperatrix mundi.  16:31, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm thinking it's definitely ducky. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Check. They've been reading too much Agatha Christie ;) SPI then? O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  17:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Worth having a look into at the least. Behavior wise they are similar, and it's really odd they have such a fixation on a seemingly random editor's page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:24, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Okaay- I can set it up of course, but tbh I haven't been following the case- I only came across it / them today, so haven't got a grasp of the background at all. I just notice the TP MfD which struck me as odd, so I looked into it. O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  17:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * That pretty much is the background though. This user created multiple XfD for a blocked user's page, then proceeded to spam these XfD with Speedy Delete votes. The user has a fixation with this specific blocked user, and their editing styles appear to be alike (not to mention that the new user was created a few weeks after the master was blocked). RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:05, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Copy Infringement on Eco-Capitalism sandbox
Hi, So earlier today you deleted the sandbox, User:Celinanguyen/sandbox, and said it was due to copyright infringement. I believe this was a mistake on my part because I thought the sandbox was private to my group and posted a section that was only paraphrased and I was planning on going back and editing the section completely in my own words. I didn't know if there is anyway you can un-delete the sandbox or provide the edits we made back to us. Thanks Hoopesha (talk) 01:53, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Pan-Turkic groups are back at it again
Hi Rickin,

I'm getting a bit frustrated with continuously Wikipedia pages that are somehow linked to the agenda of Pan-Turks. They keep manipulated with no/fake citations. Could you have a look at them?

Cheers, Ajax. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReneAjax (talk • contribs) 06:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

G12 Deletion of User Sandbox - Please Explain
Re: this deletion:

20:14, 23 February 2017 RickinBaltimore (talk | contribs) deleted page User:Celinanguyen/sandbox (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eco-capitalism)

You deleted the entire sandbox of a user due to "copyright infringement." Please let me know what it was, specifically, that you found violated a copyright and why a sandbox met the criteria for speedy deletion. I would also like to know why the entire sandbox was deleted when G12 stipulates that "earlier versions without infringement should be retained" whenever possible. I appreciate your quick clarification on this since the sandbox belonged to one of my students who, alongside their classmates, are engaging with Wikipedia through the WikiEdu program. Students are tasked with working in groups to create or update an article. Explanation as to exactly why the sandbox was deleted in its entirety can better help them understand the ins and outs of Wikipedia. If, however, it is determined that the deletion of the entire sandbox page was an error, please rectify as the deletion has cost them quite a bit of lost work product, the final version of which is due to be graded next week. In other words, your deletion of the sandbox on which they were all working is equivalent to a hard drive crash a week before finals, so if anything can be recovered, it would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.Csloman (talk) 07:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Copyright infringement of a wikipedia page? That doesn't sound right.  Catfish  Jim  and the soapdish  13:54, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Please see WP:COPYWITHIN: Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution. In any case, there is rarely a need to have a whole article in the sandbox at any one time, and be aware that images copied over, if they are not free-use, may be legal in article space only (i.e. not usersapce). Cheers, O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  14:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


 * That is an editing guideline, it isn't a policy. The correct approach would have been to speak to the user and advise them first. Use some common sense.  Catfish  Jim  and the soapdish  01:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, is absolutely clear. And, as a general rule of them, better not to advise people to 'use common sense.'  O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  16:03, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * - in this case, shouldn't the sandbox be restored and then attributed/re-edited by the students? Given that it is a sandbox, and therefore a "work in progress", I would think they should be given a sufficient amount of time to rectify said issues. Garchy (talk) 16:28, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Absolutely. And frankly, the best course of action would have been to contact the new editor, explain the situation and walk them through the process. WP:BITE (a behavioral guideline) sums it up well. We have a new editor trying to get to grips with wp, for an academic project, and they're likely to disappear altogether as a result of this heavy-handed approach.  Catfish  Jim  and the soapdish  11:15, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

G13 Deletion of Dr. Sagar S Natraj Page
You Deleted Draft:Dr. Sagar S Natraj page. I would like to ask you, if I am able to add a few references from local newspaper, will it be counted?

Hello, can you kindly respond? I have updated the article with references and it is still deleted, Kindly help.
 * The article was clearly promotional. The references did not meet our guidelines for reliable sources, and he himself doesn't appear to meet general notability guidelines. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Note
Just a heads up, User:OrangeSkunk has been socking as. They may already be blocked by the time you read this, but just thought I should give you a heads up. Thanks. 172.58.40.173 (talk) 23:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Attack edit
Here. Could you do the honours? Many thanks! O Fortuna! ...Imperatrix mundi.
 * Thanks for changing that, I was going to ask what in the heck would I do with a PDF! RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * .... Just testing! ;) thanks for that though. O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  16:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

You've got mail!
O Fortuna! ...Imperatrix mundi.  21:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2017).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Amortias • Deckiller • BU Rob13
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ronnotel • Islander • Chamal N • Isomorphic • Keeper76 • Lord Voldemort • Shereth • Bdesham • Pjacobi

Guideline and policy news
 * A recent RfC has redefined how articles on schools are evaluated at AfD. Specifically, secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist.
 * AfDs that receive little participation should now be closed like an expired proposed deletion, following a deletion process RfC.
 * Defender, HakanIST, Matiia and Sjoerddebruin are our newest stewards, following the 2017 steward elections.
 * The 2017 appointees for the Ombudsman commission are Góngora, Krd, Lankiveil, Richwales and Vogone. They will serve for approximately 1 year.

Technical news
 * A recent query shows that only 16% of administrators on the English Wikipedia have enabled two-factor authentication. If you haven't already enabled it please consider doing so.
 * Cookie blocks should be deployed to the English Wikipedia soon. This will extend the current autoblock system by setting a cookie for each block, which will then autoblock the user after they switch accounts under a new IP.
 * A bot will now automatically place a protection template on protected pages when admins forget to do so.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:14, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Deleted Sandbox
Hi RickinBaltimore, you recently deleted my wikipedia page, which is understandable, I was curious to see how long it would last online for an art piece. However,all of my Sandbox account has been deleted? I thought Sandbox was a place intended for experimentation so why has it been taken down? Kind Regards Hayley Darbyshire (talk) 16:09, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Your sandbox, while a place to work on draft pieces away from the mainspace, is still subject to Wikipedia's rules, especially those regarding web-hosting. If you're looking to do this, I'd suggest a free blogging or webhosting site instead. Also, I don't think I deleted the sandbox page, that would been instead. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Copy cat :) I cut my sandbox in half and preserved it in formaldehyde

deleted ivory wade
Hi RickinBaltimore, you recently deleted ivory wade page rapidly,he is one of America famous rapper.Im trying to develop Wikipedia about American rappers. many of them have Wikipedia page a few of them haven't Wikipedia page i trying for develop that. I start with ivory wade one of American famous rapper you can check reference. you should not delete it speedy.we should discuss about that (mariya_mon96 (mariya_mon96) 16:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)).
 * Ivory Wade clearly does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for a musician. For a "famous rapper" I find very, very few google hits, and none from what we consider reliable sources. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:47, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy close of ROC Maestro
Note that the author did blank the article, but he very soon after set up a copy at User:Erics101/sandbox/ROC Maestro and submitted it for AFC review, so I don't think his intention is that we not have the article. - MrOllie (talk) 20:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I didn't catch the sandbox article, right now I think this is fine though, let it go through AfC and then come to the mainspace after. The original also was already at AfD too, so not sure if it would have survived. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for blocking the spammer and rev-deleting the spam revision on Featured topics/2012 Tour de France. –Grondemar 23:34, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Rssinfotech


A tag has been placed on your user page, User talk:Rssinfotech, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. O Fortuna! ...Imperatrix mundi.  10:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Uhhhhhh.....I placed a block tag on the talk page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:15, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Ahhh... if it was a blank page before you did that, the Machine must've seen you as the page creator I guess? But stop creating those spam pages anyway :P ;)   O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  13:19, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * And I could have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for those meddling kids, and that mangy dog. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:32, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

My patrolling experience
Hello, I'm not sure if there is a way for you remember my patrolling experience from my username (I do your's since I receive email notifications of page deletion from your end for the ones I tag via CSD). In any case, if you do, would you please consider endorsing my request for 'New Page Patroller' rights (which has been denied for now) - here? However, if you think that I do not have sufficient experience, I would understand and re-apply once I do. Thanks for your time. TopCipher (talk) 10:14, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks like it's been done already, sorry I didn't respond sooner, or I would have done so. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem and thank you for your consideration! TopCipher (talk) 14:52, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Bansal Classes
The consensus at Wp:Articles for deletion/Bansal Classes was that it is notable. G11 deletion is invalid. Quoth WP:CSD: "If a page has survived its most recent deletion discussion, it should not be speedy deleted except for newly discovered copyright violations and pages that meet specific uncontroversial criteria; these criteria are noted below.". Please restore. 103.6.159.81 (talk) 08:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello? WP:ADMINACCT requires you to respnd to the above. You are accountabe for all your admin actions. 103.6.159.81 (talk) 06:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It appears that this exists at Bansal Learning, so since that's the case I will not restore at this time as there doesn't appear to be a need to do so. If you feel it needs to be restored, go to deletion review. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi again, I'm not sure whether I pinged you correctly over at the AfD - Articles for deletion/Bansal Learning, please so undelete this page so that we can have fuller discussion on which article needs to be kept. Promo can be easily removed. 103.6.159.85 (talk) 10:19, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * As I stated earlier, I felt the page needed to be deleted, and I'm not restoring it at this time. Please take this to deletion review. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Where??
Hi Rick, Can you tell me where to go to request a page reprotect? The semi came off WrestleMania 33 today and as soon as it came off the vandals hit it, so I need to request another semi for it and I can't find where to request it. Chris "WarMachineWildThing"  Talk to me 13:51, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:RFPP is your friend. You can go there anytime you need a page protected, even if protection has expired previously. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:53, 7 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you sir, I was going insane looking for it and trying to keep up with the article. Chris "WarMachineWildThing"  Talk to me 13:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * FYI don't worry about the request. I took care of it for a month. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Did not see your response until after I requested, I removed my request as you already semid, thank you. Chris "WarMachineWildThing"  Talk to me 14:03, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Not a problem, figure a month will be enough since the event will be over after the protection expires. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:04, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Nice thinking Chris "WarMachineWildThing"  Talk to me 14:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

66.76.33.114
What exactly do you mean by "per previous block history"? The longest block here appears to have been 1 month. 172.58.38.237 (talk) 16:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm giving them a week based on the previous block history, and the length of time since their blocks. They had not been blocked in a year prior to the other day. If they continue in a weeks' time I've sure it will be increased right away. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, you were referring to the most recent block, my bad... 172.58.38.237 (talk) 16:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Hey Rick
This edit it changing someone else's post from March 2016. Chris "WarMachineWildThing"  Talk to me 17:09, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I gotcha, I just saw the Obama entry and thought they were reverting vandalism from before. Didn't realize it had been there since '16. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:10, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Replied on my talk but, yeah I think the original post was trying to be funny but since it's from 2016 I don't know. Galaxy has been Vandalizing the talk ever since the article was semied so I'm sure it's one of the IPs from earlier. Chris "WarMachineWildThing"  Talk to me 17:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks like they stopped for now, I'll keep an eye out on them. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Got to thinking about it so I went back and found the original post, it appears to have been vandalized and changed several times since. So I fixed it. Chris "WarMachineWildThing"  Talk to me 18:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Feedback and Guide me on how to submitted
Respected Rick, I need your HELP and GUIDANCE on Article that I submitted in Adil Adi. Please, can you share your FEEDBACK? Thanks Adil AdiAdil Adi (talk) 19:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC) What is the reason that you remove the article? I will be more appreciated to learn from you. Adil Adi (talk) 19:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The issue is that the article was promotional in nature. This is something that we discourage on Wikipedia. Additionally, and much more importantly, this was an autobiography. This is something that is HIGHLY discouraged, and is scrutinized even more so. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:40, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Regarding PSI
I believe that this page should be deleted, because it is mostly made up of promotional material and is made mostly by school's students and other people, who are in close connection with the subject. This explains, why this article is almost entirely unsourced and is written like an advertisement booklet. This page needs to be entirely re-written to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. Even though this page contains clean up tags, cleaning up won't help the issue very much. I will place the CSD tag back where it belongs. Cheers, Friy Man  talk 14:51, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'd not do that. If you think the page needs to be deleted, take it to AfD at this point. Once a CSD tag is removed by an editor that is not the author, it's a contested deletion, and CSD no longer applies. I don't have an opinion on the page, except that cleanup does not equal deletion. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your advice, RickinBaltimore! I have made an AfD discussion about the article and I believe it will be deleted. I did not know about the contested deletion policy. Thank you, Friy Man  talk 15:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem! RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Vote (X)
If they reuse an IP, subsequent blocks are usually considerably longer. --Neil N  <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 16:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Last one was 122 days, 6 months is longer right? Or did I mis-read? RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:04, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh damnit, I thought I changed that to 6 months! Sorry about that. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:05, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem, just plugging one tiny hole in the sieve :) --<b style="color:navy">Neil N </b> <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 16:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

About a deleted page
Dear RickinBaltimore,

As I noticed the Creamfinance page was proposed for a speedy deletion and afterwards deleted. I believe there is significant new information for this page that would justify recreating the deleted page. I am willing to contribute to its content if you give the chance. Can this be done by reuploading this page a draft so that I could contribute to the content for reevaluation?

Looking forward to your response!

ArtisOzolins (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


 * This page was deleted, because it was promotional and a recreation of previously deleted page. It is generally considered bad to recreate a page, that was deleted per a deletion discussion, . And remember, pages are not always deleted, because they are not notable., have you considered salting the page? (Sorry for talk page stalking, I have been a victim of it too.) Friy Man  talk 06:39, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I have in fact salted the page, and yes this was purely promotional copy and I would not restore it. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Major General Jean-Paul Deconick
Hey Rick,

That article, which you just deleted, also needs revdel 'coz of copyvio. Would you do that please? URL of the source is https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/personnel-appointments/2017-03-02/major-general-jean-paul-deconinck-belgium-force

Cheers, 86.20.193.222 (talk) 21:10, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * You got it! RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:11, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

?
. Thanks, GABgab 02:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Just a wee bit obvious. RickinBaltimore (talk) 02:25, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

About Deleted Page Analytic Solver
I was trying to create a page simalar to Gurobi, ModeFRONTIER, ModeFRONTIER, or even Microsoft Excel. There are many other software products listed on wikipedia I thought I could create a simalar page about one I was intersted in. I would like to make it work, I just don't understand what was wrong with it. It is important to me because it's made by a company Frontline Systems Inc. in my hometown Incline Village, NV. I place where most people only think of tourism but I think it's important to show the other things that have come from Lake Tahoe. Thank you, TahoeBob —Preceding undated comment added 18:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Reviewing the page, the issue with the software, and the reason for deletion, was that it was promoting the product, rather than describing it. A second issue that may apply is if it even a notable piece of software, see WP:GNG for a better understanding of what is notable. WHile there are other software applications, they have met the general notability guidelines for inclusion. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:41, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Part's of Analytic Solver have shipped with every version of excel since 1990, there must be a billion people or more who have it. It was the first solver software to be accessible in every major spreadsheet program. The page was a work in progress could you at least allow me to edit it in draft so I can fix it to meet the guide lines. As I believe it is a very notable piece of software from a very notable company founded by a notable person Dan Fylstra Thank you TahoeBob (talk) 19:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I posted the deleted text at User:TahoeBob/Sandbox. Feel free to work on it there, but be mindful of the promotional tone of the article. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:09, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

41 Entertainment Post
Hi Rick -

You recently deleted a page for 41 Entertainment. The company is established and has years of successful partnerships that can easily be found throughout the web. We are a major supplier of children's animated content to Netflix. The most recent submission was written in a neutral, factual style. Also, everything was attributed to outside resources. We would like to resubmit our document to have a page on Wikipedia. Thank you to advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41ent (talk • contribs) 19:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I would HIGHLY recommend a name change immediately before this is even considered. Your user name, and the use of "we" in your message shows this is a promotional account, and is not allowed per Wikipedia's rules. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah I saw that- and would have nominated it if it hadn't already been. Classic example of providing nothing but puff about the company, with nothing encyclopaedic remaining. How much more obvious does SEO have to become, I wonder. &mdash;  O Fortuna!   Imperatrix mundi.  19:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

UPDATED: CHRIST APOSTOLIC CHURCH INTERNATIONAL
Hello I responded to the Speedy deletion tag placed against the article CHRIST APOSTOLIC CHURCH INTERNATIONAL by the user Reddogsix on his talk page. The article is about the pioneers of PENTECOSTALISM in Ghana. This is the first ever pentecostal ministry started in Ghana 100 years ago. It is an international organization with branches in the United States of America, Togo, Nigeria, and other parts of Africa.

Kindly reverse the deletion or send them on my talk page so that I add the update. I was updating the page when you deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockampson (talk • contribs) 18:32, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm going to provide the text in your sandbox for you to work on right here: User:Rockampson/sandbox. Once you're done with the page, I would highly recommend you send it through the articles for creation process to ensure it looks ok for publishing. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:38, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

AG Markets
Hey RickinBaltimore you just deleted the AG Markets article (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=AG_Markets&action=edit&redlink=1). I would really like if you indicate me what to change on the article in order to not delete it. I've created this company's website but is a company that people is interested on, Is not advertising. So please, it would be really helpful if you indicate me what to change on the artice to not delete it.

Thanks in advance Ksekoliara —Preceding  and I'm not sure how to take out that link at the end, sorry.undated comment added 15:25, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * SInce you created the company website, you have an admitted conflict of interest with the article. That aside, the article did not show how the company was notable, nor did it have any outside independent reliable sources to show why it was notable. This was an ad for the company, not as an encyclopedic article. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Hey again rick, I don't think I have a conflict of interests, The company is a forex broker and has a wide amount of clients. So, if I show you reliable sources to show that is notable you will not delete it? Is not an AD. Sorry I wanted to say ARticle not website. I created the article.

Thanks in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ksekoliara (talk • contribs) 10:18, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * THe issue again is that since you created the company website, that is a direct conflict of interest, as you worked with the company in question. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Ksekoliara - First, please sign your posts. Second, sometimes there isn't anything that you can change on a promotional article to make it non-promotional.  A corporate article can be deleted for non-notability or for promotional nature, or both.  The argument that "people are interested" may be true but irrelevant; we don't use Wikipedia to serve a commercial interest.  RickinBaltimore is a reasonable administrator and deletes things that need deleting.  Sometimes they can't be fixed.  Robert McClenon (talk) 20:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Slap!
TJH2018 talk  18:38, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yup, I deserve it. For what no idea. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It's normally for doing your job I find :) &mdash;  O Fortuna!   Imperatrix mundi.  20:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Template:West Coast Main Line
Would you mind taking another look at the page history for Template:West Coast Main Line, which you deleted? I don't know anything about it, but it may have been speedy-tagged in error. See this talk page discussion for some confusing details. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yup. I done did screw up. I've corrected the error (I think). RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:20, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Guess I deserved that trout up there. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:25, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Request
Can I see the first section of the deleted article without any copyright violations restored?
 * Which article are you speaking of? RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:05, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:List of reconstructed Thracian words — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.19.208.22 (talk) 17:28, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The issue is reviewing the edit it looks like a direct copy and paste from, which I wouldn't be able to republish obviously. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:35, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

You're Quick
I was trying to edit the speedy template for an article to add a reason and got the message that you had deleted it while I was editing, asking if I really wanted to re-create it. Of course not. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:09, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Whoosh! RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Review BuzzConf
Hi RickinBaltimore. A few of the BuzzConf community came to look at and work on the BuzzConf page I created, and I was asked if it's ready for resubmission. I don't want to make the mistake of making it part of the main Wikipedia area yet, and was wondering if there's any way to get feedback on the page to date. Thanks!! --Geekcamper (talk) 04:03, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * One of the biggest issues I have with the page is the lack of independent secondary reliable sources. So far the only sources you have in the article are to your event, which are 1st party and not able to be used for sourcing. I do see there are press releases on the event, but these aren't tied into the article and help establish it's notability. It's looking better, but it's not ready to go just yet. Also, if you did submit it through AfC, and it's declined, it isn't a negative, the AfC editors can pinpoint what you'd have to do with the article. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:36, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:ErgodE IT Services Pvt. Ltd.
You deleted this a couple of weeks ago- can you just see whether it's substantially different in its new creation? Take care &mdash;  O Fortuna!   Imperatrix mundi.  12:30, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The ad copy has been removed somewhat, though the "Omniservices" section does read a bit like a promotion of the company's services (and I don't think it's needed). Needs sourcing though. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

CA207
Hi Rick. I'm not seeing the issue with - removing an unsourced DoB and adding references. They deserve a barnstar. Unless I'm missing something... -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:06, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I made a big mistake apparently. :( Unblocked and I'll apologize RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Bibliotech Page review
Hello, you recently deleted the Bibliotech page after it had been submitted for review and cited G11 for unambiguous advertising but I was wondering if it could be reinstated. It has been edited several times since its original deletion as a draft, and is a neutral article - unless you can pinpoint which part specifically seems like advertising. The article mirrors other pages of similar companies including Chegg and Spotify, for example, and also covers other relevant topics including education and changes in publishing. There are also several sources cited that support the information (not just about the company) and therefore does not seem worthy of deletion. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cris Tkatchenko (talk • contribs) 09:35, 17 March 2017 (UTC)