User talk:Ricklohre

Julie Lohre
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Julie Lohre, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 19:29, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Julie Lohre
A tag has been placed on Julie Lohre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD G12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Solumeiras talk 19:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. &mdash; madman bum and angel 20:05, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Julie Lohre
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Julie Lohre, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.julielohre.com/about_mobile.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Julie Lohre and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Julie Lohre with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Julie Lohre.

It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Julie Lohre/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Julie Lohre saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! &mdash; madman bum and angel 20:05, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Julie Lohre
A tag has been placed on Julie Lohre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 16:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 16:33, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from articles you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. ''Please read Talk:Julie Lohre for the reasons I chose to mark the article for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask me on my talk page.'' Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 16:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: User talk:Ioeth
The best way that you can improve the article at this point would be to provide multiple independent sources to verify the contents of the article. I see she's been covered quite a bit, so there must be some references out there that you can add. The promotional content I was referring to is still in the article; there are two paragraphs at the bottom that are quite simply hocking her services and DVDs; they have a distinctly promotional tone. As for conflict of interest, you clearly DO have have a COI since you're her husband; it doesn't matter if you make it neutral and objective (which it's not at this point), it's still a COI. Click on that link so you can review the COI guideline, as it's very important. The article also violates the copyright of pages on www.julielohre.com; even though you're her husband, the copyright on that page belongs to her, and you have not given evidence of explicit permission of use from her. I hope this helps, please leave me another message if you have further questions. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It appears that it's already been deleted per the reasons I gave on the talk page. I would like to strongly discourage you from creating or contributing to any article or content about you or your wife as it does present a clear conflict of interest, which is a core guideline on Wikipedia. You are still welcome to contribute in any other area of the encyclopedia. Please note as well that my interaction with you is in no way meant to be a personal attack; I just want you to be aware of the policies and guidelines.  Thanks! Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: User talk:Ioeth
I like the new format, and the article has considerably less problems than it did before, so I'm not going to tag it for speedy deletion. Still, you seem to miss grasping the conflict of interest guideline. In a nutshell, the guideline says:
 * Editors proposing to write about themselves, their own organizations, or matters they have very close ties to, are strongly advised not to edit or create such articles at all (except for certain non-controversial edits) but to instead use the talk page to request help from neutral editors.

You obviously have very close ties to your wife, so writing about her is a clear conflict of interest. Given your history with articles on the subject, I will again strongly discouraging you from contributing content about your wife until you have demonstrated that you understand the COI guideline and neutral point of view policy. Again, if you have further questions, please contact me on my talk page. Oh, also remember to sign your posts with tildes ( ~ ) at the end of your post. Thanks! Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:26, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Articles created by Management Companies
What articles do you see that have been created/substantially edited by management companies? You can reply here from now on; I'll have the page taged so I can watch it. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 17:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't want to tattle... Ricklohre 18:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * A management company with an account creating articles about clients is a very gross violoation of Wikipedia policy. If you do indeed know of incidents where this has occurred, please let me know. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 18:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Actually, it seems as though maybe I was wrong...further research into the pages shows that the management company was only Cited...Actually, I guess I can't see who created the Wiki page. That's why I thought it was their management company... Ricklohre 18:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You can see the creator and all of the users that contributed to the page by clicking on the "history" tab at the top of the page. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 18:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)