User talk:Rickt11/Archive 1

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, NCAA Season 91 Volleyball Tournaments (Unoff)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, NCAA Season 91 Volleyball Tournaments (Unoff). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – NCAA Season 91 volleyball tournaments. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at NCAA Season 91 volleyball tournaments – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. – H T  D  11:23, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

UAAP S79 Volleyball template
FYI, I did not vandalize this template. You have mistaken me for the ones who edited this after me. Thanks! User talk: Voncabriga 12:42, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

In reply to your message
My bad. I misread the change log. Thanks! User talk: Voncabriga 04:09, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Flag icons
Hello, thank you very much for your volleyball contributions. WP:INFOBOXFLAG include information that you are not taking into account when editing, please review that policy.--Osplace 15:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the information – Rickt11 (talk) 01:27, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Philippines women's national volleyball team
Hello Rickt11 thanks for your efforts in editing the Philippines women's national volleyball team article but the Philippine representatives at the 2017 Asian Women's Club Volleyball Championship is strictly speaking not the national team even though most of their members will form core of the national team which will compete at the 2017 Southeast Asian Games. You can edit the PSL All Stars (known as PSL-Rebisco Manila in the 2017 AVC Club Championship) article instead, Thank You.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:40, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Premier Volleyball League Results


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Premier Volleyball League Results. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Premier Volleyball League. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Premier Volleyball League. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:11, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Revisions
Hi Rick11,

I was just wondering why you undid my revision (removal of subsidiaries).

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RegD1 (talk • contribs) 07:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello RegD1, can you provide a reference to the removal of the contents? thanks. Rick (talk) 07:32, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Megabuilders Volley Bolts) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Megabuilders Volley Bolts, Rickt11!

Wikipedia editor Insertcleverphrasehere just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Where is it based? country? city? Article does not make this clear."

To reply, leave a comment on Insertcleverphrasehere's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

—  InsertCleverPhraseHere  05:18, 18 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi Insertcleverphrasehere, I have already replied on your talk page. – Rick (talk) 05:27, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Layout
Hi Rickt11! Thank you for your enthusiasm with volleyball articles. I have noticed that some IP users and you have been adding flags in both, the infobox and the rest of the layout of Filipino volleyball articles. WP:INFOBOXFLAG is a policy that you should learn about. Please prevent to keep doing this in the near future. I am rolling back the articles now. Remember that there is no Filipino way, all articles about one subject must look the same. WikiProject Volleyball Mission: "Standardize the appearance and layout of volleyball related articles--Osplace 14:59, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello Osplace, I knew about the WP:INFOBOXFLAG and I did add some of the flagicons in the past but later removed it. The "rollback" you made caused some of the the articles not to be updated. I hope you can spend time to re-update the articles again. Thanks Rick (talk) 15:39, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * All articles have been updated. --Osplace 18:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Adding notes
There is a right way to add notes. The one you have inserted here is not valid. That is why is displayed very ugly. WP:FOOTNOTES will help you understand how to do it. --Osplace 16:15, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NCAA Season 91 Volleyball
Template:NCAA Season 91 Volleyball has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:26, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NCAA Season 91 men's volleyball elims results
Template:NCAA Season 91 men's volleyball elims results has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Links
To repeat links must be avoided per WP:REPEATLINK. It says: "Generally, a link should appear only once in an article, but if helpful for readers, a link may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, hatnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead." --Osplace 17:03, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Got it! – Rick (talk) 07:43, 26 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Osplace, there lots of repeated links in "Alyssa Valdez - Individual awards", I did not do that for sure, why don't you fix it? – Rick (talk) 14:19, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Pink notice
Have you seen the pink notice when you are editing articles about a person? The Notice about sources is about when including information, like Premier Volleyball League 1st Season Collegiate Conference, like you did in the Alyja Daphne Santiago article without including any reference, is completely wrong. --Osplace 21:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah right! and when me or somebody includes reference(s) in the awards you will also say it is wrong. Rick (talk) 04:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Isa Molde
The removed content about the Isa Molde article have no inline citations supporting any statement:
 * U17 National team, no
 * UAAP Season 78, no
 * 2016 Shakey's V-League individual award, no
 * Shakey's V-League 12th result, no
 * Shakey's V-League 13th result, no

You should do some reading. Content removed. --Osplace 20:12, 27 October 2017 (UTC)


 * You should also consider yourself warned about WP:EDITWAR. --Osplace 20:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Again, you should be the one to do some reading, the references were there, all of it is related to another wiki article, you just don't have the time to "click". And warn me about WP:EDITWAR? I'm not a newbie – Rick (talk) 23:47, 27 October 2017 (UTC)


 * You act like a newbie yourself. It do not work like that, is not clicking the link to look to another article to check if she participated in the U17 or won that award, no! You have to talk about it in the career section, then adding the reference there, then you should include that information in the table. When you just revert without doing anything different or stating any comment, then you are just edit warring. --Osplace 11:23, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


 * yeah whatever, why not do it yourself to do the research instead of just removing it? you know, contributors do extensive research on those articles and you just remove it. why not leave a message (at least as a courtesy) to the contributor to add ref/cite to their contributions? Rick (talk) 11:34, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


 * When I work on an article, I do extensive research. WP:BLPSOURCES "This policy extends that principle, adding that contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced should be removed immediately and without discussion." --Osplace 11:56, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Fine, do it by the book (for you) always black & white, and no leniency or at least give some time for the contributor to add the ref. Rick (talk) 12:06, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Rules are meant to guide you. Wheter if you like it or not. Not to your convinience, then should we suspend it or drop it? No, you should not ask any editor to "give you a chance", if a section is removed and you are willing to include it, you should do the research. The article is better now. You should learn how to fill a reference and how to use it. WP:CITEFOOT "...citation markers are normally placed after adjacent punctuation such as periods and commas... Note also that no space is added before the citation marker." There is a sentence fully WP:PEACOCK and WP:EDITORIAL, Even before she hit the UAAP stage, Molde, a Hope Christian High School alumna, has already turned heads with her variety of ways in scoring points for the Lady Maroons that is information is not relevant neither included in the citation given, what is idea behind that sentence? --Osplace 12:16, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I do not have a single idea about the last line you wrote, why not ask the person who put it? surely I did not write that. And yeah, I've seen what you've done with the article, you should inform the original author. Rick (talk) 12:27, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Infobox volleyball biography
According to the template Template:Infobox volleyball biography you no longer have to include conversion templates, conversions have been set to automatic. Now you just have to input "X cm" or "X ft Y in", "X kg" or "X lb" and "X cm" or "X in". --Osplace 01:26, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Edit summary
Hello Rickt11! Part of the article editing is consulting the Watchlist, Difference between revisions and the Revision history. If you do not include an Edit summary we do not know at a glance what you have been doing. Please read the whole WP:EDS. Thank you, --Osplace 16:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Fellow Filipino editors
I would like you to know this about your fellow Filipino editors Mmhuang and Moanabanana. Hope you do not use the same tactics they did. --Osplace 17:49, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Alyssa Valdez
I she playing in both leagues at the same time? Really! --Osplace 18:07, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Not at the same time, but if you are watching her games, she played for creamline last week and will be playing for attack line this week. Rick (talk) 21:20, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Hang on, where did it say that "she's playing in both leagues at the same time"? Like I said, she is playing for both "teams". Rick (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes you did. Does she finished playing for Creamline? Yes or not, have she played for Attack line yet? yes or not? Both clubs cannot be to present, thats why. When you said "For the 2017 season of the Premier Volleyball League, Valdez joined the expansion team, the Creamline Cool Smashers." What do you mean? Reinforced, Open or Collegiate? The link does not help a casual reader. "She also got her 4th PVL MVP award and the 1st best outside spiker award." Does she? --Osplace 03:38, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * How can I say she's finished playing for Creamline? Creamline and Ateneo just had an exhibition game in Cebu (Dec 8, 2017 video ) and yesterday Attack line had a match ( video ), if you have a better way of putting her presence in both teams during this December 2017, then go ahead... "For the 2017 season of the Premier Volleyball League, Valdez joined the expansion team, the Creamline Cool Smashers." <- not my words, that could have been done by another editor ( probably this? ). This is what I only edited. Anyways, I did some changes and added reference. Rick (talk) 06:07, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks for the videos. You must understand how unusual situation is this. Why a lot about Valdez? Because she is one of the most visited Volleyball articles, casual editors joining us with a bad reference can spread wrongdoings anywhere. Thaks for edits and keep working. --Osplace 14:28, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Carmela Tunay
This statement that you included here from this source:
 * pursued a Marketing Masters degree also at UST, and with it she took on UAAP season 78 as her last
 * pursued a Marketing Masters degree also at UST, and with it she took on Season 78 as her last

Is blatant WP:COPYVIO violation and had been removed. --Osplace 14:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Standard medals
There is a problem with your standard medals. Before doing such thing, can we take it to a layout discussion? --Osplace 12:42, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * link of the "layout discussion"? Rick (talk) 13:14, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Is located here. --Osplace 15:56, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (NCAA Season 93 volleyball tournaments) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating NCAA Season 93 volleyball tournaments, Rickt11!

Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for taking the time creating this page."

To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Baby miss fortune 05:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Café Lupe Sunrisers
Hi Rick, just to let you know on my revert to this article, that IP (who hops about a load of 189.xxx IPs) is a long term vandal. His behaviour is easy to spot as he always just adds ridiculous kits. I can cover off most of the vandalism on football articles, but rarely see anything elsewhere as I don't watch other sport team articles. If you see something like this on any other articles, please feel free to revert on sight. If you can add to the top of the IP talk page and let me know as well I can block the IP temporarily. Thanks, Fenix down (talk) 15:22, 8 March 2018 (UTC).
 * Hi Fenix down, thanks for the revert. And yes, I'll try to keep an eye on the edits of that IP. Regards – Rick (talk) 15:30, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, the specific IP will change, but generally they start 189 (geolocating to Brazil), but the edits are always very similar so you shouldn't have any problem seeing the issue. Any doubts, let me know. Fenix down (talk) 15:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

UAAP Season 80 volleyball tournaments
Hi Rick, just wanted to know why you reverted the semis template in this page. The reason I created the template was to sync both this page and the main UAAP Season 80 page. This would also allow for editing the only template itself, instead of editing both pages individually. Let me know your thoughts on this. Regards - (talk) 09:12, 18 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi, sorry about that but we're trying to avoid excessive templates since such templates will only be used "twice" and not in multiple articles. Both pages, "UAAP Season 80 volleyball tournaments" and "UAAP Season 80" will be synced once you edit the volleyball tournaments page using the LST or transclusion. LST is for sharing information between articles. Please refer to this discussion for further info. Regards – Rick (talk) 10:15, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

About Players of Creamline Cool Smashers
Hello Rickt11, I just wanna say to you that there are rumors that Nikolina Asceric is no longer playing for Creamline Cool Smashers and replaced by Laura Schaudt. She is a former import of Creamline Cool Smashers. Anyways, that is a rumors only. Let's wait for the News regarding about the imports of Creamline Cool Smashers.

Have a Nice Day. ThePhenom02 (talk) 15:54, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the scoop and let’s just wait for the announcement (officially). Have a nice day too. Rick (talk) 21:51, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Jaja Santiago
Hi, Can't you see the fivb page?--Chiba ryo (talk) 10:56, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, that page misspelled her name, her full name is spelled as "ALYJA DAPHNE SANTIAGO", as in this article, and is commonly known here in the Philippine volleyball (and sports) community. Regards – Rick (talk) 21:54, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Cafe Lupe Sunrisers
Hi. I have already removed the notes. - User:iamdumdum (talk) 06:43, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about 2019 Spikers' Turf
Hello, Rickt11,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Steve Quinn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, 2019 Spikers' Turf should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/2019 Spikers' Turf.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Steve Quinn (talk) 22:33, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Talk:UST Growling Tigers
Hello. I would like to invite you to join the discussion at Talk:UST Growling Tigers regarding the removal of roster tables of the varsity teams of the UST Growling Tigers. Your input will be of great help. Thanks. NRT^530 (talk) 13:07, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Chris 0411F (talk) 11:40, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NCAA Season 93 juniors' volleyball match-up results
Template:NCAA Season 93 juniors' volleyball match-up results has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:01, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

October 2023 NPP Backlog Drive sign up
Hello! I noticed that you are signed up for the October 2023 NPP Backlog Drive. However, you're going to be unable to participate if you do not have the New Page Reviewer permission. If you are still interested in participating in the backlog drive, then I encourage you to request the permission at WP:PERM/NPR. I have, for the moment, removed you from the participants list as you not able to participate at this point in time. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Rickt11. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for maintenance so that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
 * Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
 * Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 13:15, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive
 Hello Rickt11:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive participation
Hey there! I noticed you are signed up for the January 2024 NPP Backlog Drive, but it seems your New Page Reviewer permission was on a trial basis and has now expired. If you're still keen on joining the backlog drive, why not ask for a renewal at WP:PERM/NPR? – DreamRimmer (talk) 05:19, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi Rickt11. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for maintenance so that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
 * Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
 * Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 11:20, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Wishing you a happy 2024! Happy Holidays text.png


Rickt11, Have a great 2024 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

– 2024 is a leap year   – news article. – Background color is Peach Fuzz (#0FFBE98), Pantone's 2024 Color of the year Send New Year cheer by adding    to user talk pages.

–  98  𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂  10:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

About license compatibility
Hi, @Rickt11! I saw in this diff that you added a Free-content attribution notice to a source on Jimenez v. Cañizares. Please note that CC BY-NC licenses are not compatible with Wikipedia's CC BY-SA license. Text that incorporates BY-NC sources should be treated as copyright violations and removed/WP:RD1'd accordingly. Compatible licenses has more information on this.

Luckily, works produced by the Philippine government (including Supreme Court decisions, or "G.R."s) are in the public domain, and no content needs to be removed here (n.b. reproductions of public domain content do not have their own copyright, per WMF—Commons has more information on this). Just thought I should give a heads up in case you encounter a similar case in the future. Chlod (say hi!) 08:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Olive
Thanks for reviewing my draft and accepting it. However, when you moved it to article space, you changed the title a bit. Normally, the title is that style like Typhoon Rita (1972) or Hurricane Jose (1999). &#39;&#39;Flux55&#39;&#39; (talk) 12:37, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi there &#39;&#39;Flux55&#39;&#39;, when I was moving the article to the main space (with the original title) it said that there was already an existing article with the same name. Anyways, thanks also for creating articles. Rick (talk) 05:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello ,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:The Rookie seasons


A tag has been placed on Category:The Rookie seasons indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:51, 13 July 2024 (UTC)