User talk:Rickvarela1

== September 2013 ==

Hello, I'm Jamesx12345. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Designer clothing because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. Jamesx12345 16:50, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:58, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Appeal block.

 * Adding the same link across multiple articles can be considered spamming. If you are unblocked, do you agree to cease linking to or promoting corluxuryny? --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:00, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Unblock requests
Yes I will adhere to the guidelines. Is it acceptable to create a page defining corluxury as I saw that century 21 has a page and other establishments. Thanks.
 * It would be helpful in evaluating your request to know what your affiliation is with corluxury. As it stands I have concerns that you are editing with a conflict of interest. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

I work for corluxury. Basically I would like to inform others of its existence. Is that a conflict of interest. I see there are articles or pages that define establishments, Like Cisco and others. Please inform me or point me to info that can clarify this. In no means do I intend to not conform to the communities rules and regulations. thanks.
 * I hope you don't mind but I removed the extra talk header you added. The headers are meant to separate conversations as opposed to each individual post. There is a distinct conflict of interest that arises when an employee attempts to create an article on their company; Wikipedia policy dictates that all edits must be neutral. This becomes an almost impossible task for an individual so close to the subject. You may have every intent to remain neutral, but that inherent conflict of interest prevents you from being so. If you were not able to create or edit articles related to corluxury, would you still be interested in editing Wikipedia?--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:30, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Unblock request
I now understand and will uphold the neutral clause. I will not edit or create a definition for any company that I am directly working for. Please un block me so that I can participate in the great community. Thanks.
 * Per your agreement to not link to or write about Corluxury, I have unblocked your account.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)