User talk:RickyCourtney/Archive 2

Talk:EMD AEM-7/GA1
I wasn't sure if you were finished at Talk:EMD AEM-7/GA1 but I addressed some issues. Best, Mackensen (talk) 13:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of King County Metro fleet for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article King County Metro fleet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/King County Metro fleet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nightfury 09:09, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Request for Participation at WT: Airports
As you may be aware, there was a recent discussion on the talk page of WP:Airports which prematurely and without consensus resulted in mass changes to airport articles throughout Wikipedia. Before a drastic change like this is put into practice, it is important to have clear consensus, which from my readings as an observer, did not occur. Many of these changes started to occur before any real discussion had taken place, and despite much disagreement from some community members. Disagreement is good -- it's great actually -- without it nothing would ever get done. But it's important that everyone opinions are heard fairly and accurately, and that significant changes like merging the Regional Airline destinations with the Mainline destinations are not done without such consensus. I encourage you, as someone involved in WP:Airports and the original discussion, to voice your opinions and discuss with others about how we should move forward at this point. Positive and constructive conversation is the way to a consensus. I also ask that everyone (myself included) ceases merging or un-merging mainline/regional destinations until a censuses is reached. Please contribute to the conversation here. T ofutwitch11  (T ALK ) 00:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Seattle–Tacoma International Airport


Hello, RickyCourtney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Seattle–Tacoma International Airport".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 09:45, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fresno Yosemite International Airport
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fresno Yosemite International Airport you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. 1.02 editor (C651 set 217/218) 04:04, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Fresno Yosemite International Airport
Hello! Your submission of Fresno Yosemite International Airport at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:21, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Fresno Yosemite International Airport
Hello! Your submission of Fresno Yosemite International Airport at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:08, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Talkback
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Fresno Yosemite International Airport
Hello! Your submission of Fresno Yosemite International Airport at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:57, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Olympic-class ferry


Hello, RickyCourtney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Olympic-class ferry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Fresno Yosemite International Airport
Hello! Your submission of Fresno Yosemite International Airport at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Fresno Yosemite International Airport
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: Beeblebrox (talk) 21:08, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Thank you re: SeaTac/Airport station
Thank you for your comments on that talk page. I shall keep your suggestion of a non-academic and conversational tone in mind. Your thoughts are most appreciated. I believe there is a mistake in your understanding of the bus stops being connected to the bridge but that doesn't detract from the appreciation of your input. Vanguard10 20:43, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

SnowFire suggested a list, similar to one appearing in another transit station article. I am willing to go with that compromise. Do you want to? If so, the problem may be resolved. See Talk:SeaTac/Airport station for sample wording. Vanguard10 (talk) 04:50, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Burbank Airport North station
They just added a new Metro rapid 794 stop at Hollywood Way and San Fernando Rd to accommodate the new station. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jg10101 (talk • contribs) 20:47, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Retitle the L.A. Task Force
Your attention is called to the discussion here, suggesting retitling Los Angeles Task Force to Los Angeles County Task Force. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 22:07, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Checking the list
Hello. I am WP:boldly culling the membership list of the Los Angeles Area Task Force. Some people don’t participate any more. Because you joined more than ten years ago, I am asking if you still want to be listed as a participant. I’ll be deleting those who say no or don’t answer, and then we can move merrily forward. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fresno Yosemite International Airport


Hello, RickyCourtney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fresno Yosemite International Airport".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

mobileUndo
Hello, recently was blocked for sock puppetry. The left behind few of their scripts. has copied the scripts, and has taken over maintaining them. It appears that you currently importing an outdated version of import FR30799386's mobileUndo, and I thought that you might want to import an updated and maintained version. The outdated version you are currently importing has some bugs. Those bugs have been fixed by the original creator and DannyS712 synced their version of the script with it. Also FR is currently rewritting and updating this script on meta-wiki per this advice as well as adding new features. Please copy one of the following codes and replace it with the code you currently have in your Special:MyPage/minerva.js or Special:MyPage/common.js to import this script. Thank you. Masum Reza 📞 15:52, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * mw.loader.load('//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:DannyS712/Undo.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript'); – Stable version
 * mw.loader.load('//meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:FR30799386/undo.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript'); – Beta version - Major UI improvements - Might has some bugs. Please help by sending bug reports to meta:User_talk:FR30799386 if you find any.

Template:LACMTATW color
What was the use case for ? It appears to be unused. Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 13:16, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * It's been so long since I built that, I don't even remember the use case. It seems to date back to the brief period when Metro was branding the transitways, but before the Silver Line was established. I would vote to delete the template unless it's being used by something else. --RickyCourtney (talk) 18:09, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that's about what I thought. I've nominated it for deletion. Mackensen (talk) 20:55, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited OC Streetcar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orange County Sheriff's Department ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/OC_Streetcar check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/OC_Streetcar?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

SR-187
If that's the case, then you might as well remove SR-47 from the A Line's simplified map too as it's not a highway at the point of intersection neither. Lars Smiley (talk) 19:06, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Milpitas station
I was considering leaving a note seeing if you thought a merge was in order - and then you beat me to it! Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:48, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Why did you flip the direction of the ACE adjacent stations template? It's largely east-west, so it makes sense to have the western terminus (San Jose) on the left. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The line is also north-south, by flipping it, we match the directionality of the Caltrain templates (at the San Jose and Santa Clara stations) and the San Joaquin templates (at the Stockton station). If you disagree, I'm not opposed to changing it back. --RickyCourtney (talk) 06:47, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I would prefer to. The three overlapping stations you mentioned can be handled with |to-right= and so on; I can handle that if you want. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:49, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Have at it. I've been working on all the VTA stuff for a while now... so I'm getting tired of these repetitive edits. Haha. --RickyCourtney (talk) 06:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Will do. I definitely appreciate the work you've been doing with the VTA stations! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:53, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, should be done - let me know if you notice any errors. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

LACMTA
Just to notify you, I'm beginning the switchover to letters and I'm removing all instances of s-line from LACMTA stations.  Cards84664  (talk) 19:51, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

"A Line (Blue) (Los Angeles Metro)" listed at Requested moves
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the requested move of A Line (Blue) (Los Angeles Metro) and other Metro pages. Since you had some involvement with pages related to A Line (Blue) (Los Angeles Metro) and others, you might want to participate in the discussion if you wish to do so. Lexlex (talk) 11:35, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Question about 787-10 production location
Hello Ricky. Since you undo-ed my edit on Boeing Everett Factory article regarding the 787 production with the -10 variant at Everett, I have a question to ask you: Is the 787-10 variants are produced from Boeing Everett Factory? If not, then why that variant is not produced from Everett but instead from another location other than the Washington state? -- Allen (talk / ctrb) 19:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The 787-10 variant has not been produced at Everett and will not be for the foreseeable future. If you read just slightly above the models on the Boeing Everett Factory article... there's this info: "Boeing announced that the 787-10 variant, the longest variant of the 787, would be produced exclusively in South Carolina as the fuselage pieces for that variant are too large for the Dreamlifter to fit for transport to Everett." Hope that answers your questions. --RickyCourtney (talk) 20:07, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Zip codes
ZIP codes are primarily for postal use, which is irrelevant for stations. Why should we clog up infoboxes - which are intended to present the most important information - with information that's not actually useful? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:17, 4 June 2020 (UTC) I don't know and I don't really care either way, I just know that's what's on the example on template instructions page. Maybe it's a topic you should discuss on the template's talk page and the proper Wiki Project page? --RickyCourtney (talk) 01:19, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Hyphens
Please be aware of Wikipedia's Manual of Style for hyphens, which says "Avoid using a hyphen after a standard -ly adverb (a newly available home, a wholly owned subsidiary) ...". In particular, in the article Toyota Motor North America. Chris the speller  yack  18:33, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Siemens Viaggio Comfort


Hello, RickyCourtney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siemens Viaggio Comfort".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:55, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Brightline West Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Brightline West Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

MS 61
Hello, do you have a source for the "Z 8300" claim for the MS 61 fleet? You also made the same claim in MI 09 despite the fact they are fleets of two different generations. -- Minoa (talk) 00:56, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * That was my mistake, it was a copy paste error and was quickly deleted. Thanks for keeping me honest. Cheers! --RickyCourtney (talk) 01:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I think we need a source for the claim in MI 09 too. Since most people call it the MI 09, the Z 8300 claim can be easily questioned. We will also need an article for Class Z 23000 if the MS 61 is to have any chance of being a Good Article here on en-wiki. -- Minoa (talk) 12:48, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Made that change on the MI 09 page. Also created a starter article on the Z 23000. Please feel free to expand. Also, I reorganized the MS 61 article to have a large consolidated history section, which is IMHO the established “style” on the en Wiki. --RickyCourtney (talk) 14:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

MI 84 moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, MI 84, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Toyota TNGA-C platform
Hello, RickyCourtney. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Toyota TNGA-C platform, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 06:37, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Toyota TNGA-C platform


Hello, RickyCourtney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Toyota TNGA-C platform".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:35, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Acela into Draft:Acela Express (trainset). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Template:L Line (Los Angeles Metro)
Hello, RickyCourtney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Template:L Line (Los Angeles Metro), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

File:S700 US LRV Drawing.png
Shouldn't this image also be added to the Siemens S700 and S70 article? It definitely seems like it should go there... Just a thought. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for James R. Mills Building
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

eBART
Does anyone – i.e. reliable sources – actually refer to eBART as "light rail"?! APTA calls it "commuter rail". BART itself doesn't use the words "light rail" at its eBART page. So is anyone noteworthy actually calling the system this?! Or is this another case of Wikipedia editors deciding that something was the case without RS's backing it up?... I've actually been wondering about this for a while. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:44, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I can't find any reliable sources that call it light rail. We definitely should be consistent about the similar diesel systems (eBART, River Line, Arrow, and Sprinter; arguably Capital MetroRail and WES Commuter Rail too). APTA and the agencies themselves aren't consistent: APTA calls Sprinter light rail and River Line commuter rail, while NJT brands the River Line as light rail.


 * My proposal would be to follow the FTA and classify them as hybrid rail. There's no perfect classification - some should probably appear on the list of commuter rail lines as well - but at least having a list of all of them together would be a useful start. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I would have no problem with classifying these systems a "hybrid rail", though I'd like to see more than just one source from the FTA calling it that... But, from a purely objective standpoint, it's crazy that APTA calls the Sprinter (with 30 minute headways!!) "light rail", while calling eBART (with up to 15 minute headways) "commuter rail" – it shows there's no rhyme or reason to this. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:46, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

First off, Pi.1415926535 you're always welcome to stalk my talk page. IJBall thanks for starting this conversation about very messy situation. On that page, I have been trying to reckon with what is "true" light rail and what is a "streetcar" (which is also arguably light rail).

The systems in question seem to be quasi-commuter rail, which could arguably be considered light rail since they use light equipment.

I like the hybrid rail title as defined by the FTA: "Rail System Primarily operating routes on the National system of railroads, but not operating with the characteristics of commuter rail. This service typically operates light rail-type vehicles as diesel multiple-unit trains (DMU's). These trains do not meet Federal Railroad Administration standards, and so must operate with temporal separation from freight rail traffic."

Or in layman's terms, a hybrid between light rail and commuter rail.

NCTD calls the Sprinter hybrid rail. BART hasn't bothered with a name, calling it a rail system that uses standard gauge track with Diesel Multiple Unit (DMU) vehicles, but that seems to fit the hybrid rail definitions. I would also add TEXRail and the Silver Line (Dallas Area Rapid Transit) to our growing list, although I would exclude WES Commuter Rail, simply because it has such lousy hours. Most of these systems we're discussing run service nearly all day, every day. --RickyCourtney (talk) 23:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for James R. Mills
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:James R Mills.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:James R Mills.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Template:L Line (Los Angeles Metro)


Hello, RickyCourtney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Template:L Line".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:30, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Z 23000
Hello, RickyCourtney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Z 23000, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:SNCF Class Z 5600
Hello, RickyCourtney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SNCF Class Z 5600, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Z 23000


Hello, RickyCourtney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Z 23000".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow  Talk  17:46, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:SNCF Class Z 5600


Hello, RickyCourtney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SNCF Class Z 5600".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:06, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Coclogosmall.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coclogosmall.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Pbrks (talk) 23:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Aéroport Charles de Gaulle 1 (Paris RER)
Hello, RickyCourtney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aéroport Charles de Gaulle 1 (Paris RER), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kitsap Fast Ferries logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kitsap Fast Ferries logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Those are not unnecessary changes. Tesla also develops software.
Tesla has developed a software ecosystem to support its energy hardware products. Say “Tesla” and most people think of electric cars. But Tesla is also an energy and software company. --JShark (talk) 01:15, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Autobidder provides independent power producers, utilities and capital partners the ability to autonomously monetize battery assets. That is important. --JShark (talk) 01:17, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. Take your complaint to talk page. Please discuss on talk page first. --JShark (talk) 01:48, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Light rail in the United States
Hello, RickyCourtney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Light rail in the United States, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Transportation Technology Center logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Transportation Technology Center logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:20, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Los Angeles International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nguyen QuocTrung (talk) 04:19, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

My apologies
I promise not to do that again. Edgar Searle (talk) 00:04, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Toyota Motor North America
Hello, RickyCourtney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Toyota Motor North America, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Needed
Addresses our very important 47.146.89.139 (talk) 01:51, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

I disagree. Looking at the pages for systems in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, New York City, Seattle, and Washington DC (just to name a few)… none have station addresses on the route level overview page. This information is displayed only on a station level page. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:43, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Metrolink addresses
The addresses were added in 2019 and are needed 47.146.89.139 (talk) 18:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

No they're not. Lars Smiley (talk) 22:53, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Unused S-line templates nominated for deletion
Please see this TFD nomination, which involves one or more templates that you created. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Toyota Motor North America


Hello, RickyCourtney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Toyota Motor North America".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:54, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MTS lines
Template:MTS lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Geary BRT
I'll try to update the article when I have time, but here's a quick summary of Geary status. Phase 1 (Stanyan to Market) became Geary Rapid, which was just completed. Phase 2 became the Geary Boulevard Improvement Project, which is proposing a side-running configuration; it's still in public outreach. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes, but the work is essentially done. From what I can tell, they will now spend the next year (or 10 years, this is Muni after all) converting the temporary bus lanes and bus bulbs to permanent versions. There won't functionally be anything different. --RickyCourtney (talk) 19:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Right now there are only dedicated lanes from Stanyan to 15th Avenue, plus a few scattered blocks west of there; lanes in the 15th-25th section and other gaps are proposed as quick-build in 2022. At minimum, I wouldn't call the project fully open until the contiguous transit lanes are open. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I guess I’m confused by SFMTA saying that “over 75% of Geary corridor has transit lanes.” Where’s the discrepancy? RickyCourtney (talk) 04:27, 15 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The corridor is about 6.4 miles long. Right now, about 4.9 miles / 76% has dedicated transit lanes:
 * 0.4 miles Outer Richmond + 1.0 mile 15th-Stanyan added by TETL in 2021
 * 1.9 miles Stanyan-Van Ness added by Geary Rapid
 * 1.0 mile Van Ness-Market added previously but painted red by Geary Rapid
 * 0.6 miles Market-Transbay from other projects
 * About an additional 0.7 miles (15th-24th, plus a few infill blocks 25th to 34th) is proposed to be added in 2022 as a quick build. That portion plus the 2021-added lanes would be painted red in 2024-25 when utility and roadway work is finished. That will complete the dedicated lanes originally proposed as "Geary BRT"; dedicated lanes have never been planned west of 34th due to limited congestion. Hopefully that clarifies a bit! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:54, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

That does, but Muni never planned to build “true” BRT with off-board fare payment, TVMs, faregates, ect. Those things you mention, especially beyond 2022, seem like just more permanent work. The rapid routes are running, there’s dedicated lanes in the most congested parts of the route. I guess I just reasoned it was okay to make the changes to say that it was more or less running, but not fully complete. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:47, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Listing of Template:MTS color at templates for discussion
Template:MTS color has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

New Orleans downtown
In New Orleans, the term "downtown" is not necessarily equivalent to "central business district." "Downtown" and "uptown" are directions, equivalent to "downriver" and "upriver." So in discussing New Orleans, it is best to use "central business district" rather than "downtown" when that is the intended meaning. Please don't change to "downtown". HGFriedman (talk) 17:43, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Problem is, that’s the exact description given in the NRHP listing that we are sharing in that infobox. Check for yourself: https://npgallery.nps.gov/AssetDetail/NRIS/73000873 As far as the rest of the page, I would not advocate for using the non-locally accepted terminology. RickyCourtney (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LVM left/Las Vegas Monorail
Template:S-line/LVM left/Las Vegas Monorail has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/LVM right/Las Vegas Monorail
Template:S-line/LVM right/Las Vegas Monorail has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LACMTA style
Template:LACMTA style has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:39, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LVM color
Template:LVM color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LVM lines
Template:LVM lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LVM stations
Template:LVM stations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-line/STExpress left/550
Template:S-line/STExpress left/550 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Discussion Community Transit provided articulated bus fleet requested.
Hey, no if you were to bother me with a page on Wikipedia editing. I'm sorry, unfortunately, you haven't posted a page on Facebook. A member group about its bus for Community Transit has a new bus for Xcelsior XD60 first day in the service last week. I Also too saw checked on the internet for Google information CPTDB Wiki list coaches 22800 (8) series. Because I follow they are posted show shares in the group and you aren't. Very sorry nothing happened to you ehh. It's your responsibility and I could understand it.

https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Community_Transit

https://cptdb.ca/wiki/index.php/Community_Transit_22800-22807

What did I say? Put on Wikipedia for an opportunity first, if you don't trust me about it CPTDB Wiki, you just go back to work now go! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmaryahJohnson1996 (talk • contribs) 03:10, 18 February 2022 (UTC)