User talk:RickyCourtney/Archive 4

Grammar on FedEx Express article
Referring to “The Memphis International Airport” or “The Indianapolis International Airport” is not grammatically correct in English. It should be simply “Memphis International Airport”, as a proper noun referring to a specific place. RedundancyAdvocate (talk) 08:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eurofighter GmbH. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RedundancyAdvocate (talk) 08:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * @RedundancyAdvocate How exactly were my edits unconstructive? In my opinion, I changed the prose to be easier to read and understand. You apparently disagree, and that's okay. But we need to assume good faith when interacting with other editors. I feel it's unfair to accuse me of making unconstructive edits when my over 15 years of experience making over 33 thousand edits would show that I am just attempting to help the project, just like I assume you are. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 18:18, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Apologies, the warn was intended to mention the FedEx Express article. See the topic above this on this page. RedundancyAdvocate (talk) 20:45, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @RedundancyAdvocate A grammar disagreement does not warrant an unconstructive edits warning. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 23:44, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
 * It is not a grammar disagreement, rather it is a grammar error on your part that I must now take the time to go and undo manually. RedundancyAdvocate (talk) 18:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Transilien logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Transilien logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:52, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Transilien
It appears that I wanted to revert an edit that falsely claimed "1969 to 2044" rather than "1969 to 1988", but I did not realise I reverted more than I should. -- Minoa (talk) 21:36, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, RickyCourtney. Thank you for your work on Breslauer Platz/Hauptbahnhof station. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   05:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Champigny Centre station moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Champigny Centre station. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:43, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Oakland International Airport


Hello, RickyCourtney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oakland International Airport".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  02:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Alaska Airlines Flight 1282
Sorry about this, I must have had an outdated version of the article loaded when I made the edit. I meant to do this. - ZLEA  T \ C 19:54, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

JetBlue focus cities
Hi. Hope you are well. I recalled the discussion over focus cities and operating bases here. As mentioned, JetBlue's Form 10-K lists "New York" as a focus city, but includes multiple New York–area airports as part of its description (emphasizing JFK the most). I noticed that since that discussion, Newark and LaGuardia have been added in the infoboxes of the airline and the airports as JetBlue focus cities.

JetBlue's Form 10-K description of New York includes Westchester County Airport (White Plains) in the same way it does Newark and LaGuardia. Would it be apt to include White Plains as a focus city as well? It seems as strongly sourced as Newark and LaGuardia would be. Precision123 (talk) 18:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Destubbed your article
Toyota Motor Manufacturing Missouri is now a start-class article. The expansion was easy, but now I’m suspiciously getting ads for Toyota. Roasted (talk) 05:19, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Union Pacific Updates
Several weeks ago, I provided an updated locomotive roster on Talk:Union Pacific Railroad, but nobody has reviewed. I'd love to work with someone on this page. MJ UnionPacific (talk) 15:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Graywalls. I noticed that you recently removed content from Unifi Aviation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You selective removed contents while leaving a misleading edit summary saying "add logo". Graywalls (talk) 03:14, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, RickyCourtney. Thank you for your work on Ram Heavy Duty (fifth generation). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   15:39, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the correction
Regarding the KC Water Taxi- you were right, official policy is that you're supposed to have a reduced fare card to get a senior discount. In practice, that's not true, so I didn't realize that was official policy. Thanks for the correction. FPTI (talk) 02:42, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Hey,

you changed the maximum seating of the 737MAX 8 to "188 or 202". That figures are for the 2-class config. But in the specifications table of the 737 MAX article the maximum seating is required: so the max. seating of a 1 class config. And that is 210 according to the stated source. 80.187.75.243 (talk) 03:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * So here’s my understanding… it’s 189 when configured as a MAX 8. That number goes up to 202 when configured as a MAX 200, which has mid-exit door. These doors are optional, which leads to the two different maximum seatings. Compare that to the MAX 9, which is always equipped with a door opening, but which can be plugged by an operator if they desire. The 210 maximum seats is new… but it’s on Boeing’s website. RickyCourtney (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Alright. Both figures are sourced now.
 * The 210 are sourced by https://www.boeing.com/commercial/737
 * The also given archive link confirms, that the 210 was stated on Boeing website in 2021 already.
 * And actually Boeing stated the figure 210 already in 2019: https://web.archive.org/web/20190405003324/https://www.boeing.com/commercial/737max/ 80.187.75.243 (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * And actually Boeing stated the figure 210 already in 2019: https://web.archive.org/web/20190405003324/https://www.boeing.com/commercial/737max/ 80.187.75.243 (talk) 13:02, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Draft:N747GE
I have made a draft on N747GE and so I was thinking will you be able to give it the same treatment you did with N7470. Because I spent so much research and time into preparing it 110.175.169.245 (talk) 08:46, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

SEPTA ridership
FYI: Talk:SEPTA Regional Rail. Mackensen (talk) 03:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VTA Platform Layout Blue Green Line Downtown
Template:VTA Platform Layout Blue Green Line Downtown has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 18:59, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Planespotters as a reliable source
Unfortunately in disagreeing so strongly about the edit [] you reverted you are pitting yourself against a lot of discussion that says the opposite. Mostly available here [].

In saying it is all OK because there is an error correction mechanism on planespotters just proves that the site has a non RS compatable user driven component. Wikipedia by contrast is certainly not a reliable source for the same reason and its error correction is remakably remarkable. Maungapohatu (talk) 20:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VTA Platform Layout Blue Line/previous
Template:VTA Platform Layout Blue Line/previous has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:37, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VTA Platform Layout Green Line/next
Template:VTA Platform Layout Green Line/next has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:37, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VTA Platform Layout Green Line/previous
Template:VTA Platform Layout Green Line/previous has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:37, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VTA Platform Layout Orange Line/next
Template:VTA Platform Layout Orange Line/next has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:38, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VTA Platform Layout Orange Line/previous
Template:VTA Platform Layout Orange Line/previous has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:38, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:VTA Platform Layout Blue Line/next
Template:VTA Platform Layout Blue Line/next has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:38, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, RickyCourtney. Thank you for your work on N661US. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   08:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Charter Tags
Hi Ricky, You’ll probably see I undid all your edits adding the “Public Charter” tags. Per WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT, it states “Do not include ad-hoc, irregular, or private charter services.” So we only include public charters under the “Charter:” tag. Thus, adding “public” is not necessary. If you are adamant about the change, I’d recommend bringing it up to the airports project.

Thanks! VenFlyer98 (talk) 00:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Totally understand the request for discussion. -- RickyCourtney (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK for N661US
RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Input requested
Your input is requested in the following discussion: Templates_for_discussion/Log/2024_April_25. Jackdude 101 talk cont 00:25, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Game Boy
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Game Boy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 21:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:A Line (Los Angeles Metro)/detailed
Template:A Line (Los Angeles Metro)/detailed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Game Boy
The article Game Boy you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Game Boy for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 15:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Muni Market Street Subway
Template:Muni Market Street Subway has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 17:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Atlas Air logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Atlas Air logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 14:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

DMS
Is there a compelling reason to force DMS coordinate display, like in this edit? I don't think that most CA railway station articles use DMS - most that I see use decimal degrees, which are more intuitive to non-technical readers. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:46, 26 June 2024 (UTC)


 * @Pi.1415926535 No, I was just under the impression that most use DMS. I don't really care, just trying to bring some consistency. Frankly, I believe neither are intuitive to non-technical readers.
 * While we're chatting... I disagree with showing Chatsworth with the Metrolink signage. It also has plenty of Metro signage and a small amount of Amtrak signage. I agree that it's mostly Metrolink on the rail platform, but IMHO, it's just easier/better to go with the generic style.
 * -- RickyCourtney (talk) 23:55, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Well, there's not any way to present coordinates simpler than decimal degrees, unfortunately. Unless there's ever a discussion with consensus to mass-convert coordinate formats, I'd say just leave them whatever format they already are.
 * I see your point about the multiple signages. I strongly prefer using a style - the colored bars make the infobox more readable, and I like the consistency with other articles - but I'm not sure how much of that is just personal preference. The signage on the rail platforms seems to be primarily Metrolink, which is why I prefer keeping that style. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)