User talk:Rickybenz90

June 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Used discography has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:33, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Used discography was changed by Rickybenz90 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2019-06-03T03:33:04+00:00

Nomination of Live from Maida Vale for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Live from Maida Vale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Live from Maida Vale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richard3120 (talk) 23:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Interwined
Hello! I reverted your revert of my edit. "Interwined" is not a word, unless you have a special definition for it? ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:38, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Used, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:12, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on The Used. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A personal website of yours does not qualify Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:00, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * See WP:PRIMARY and [[:WP:SECONDARY. Please find the latter. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:38, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Future albums
Please hold off on adding articles for future albums until there is more than just a track listing and a few singles. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I put a ton of info on their. more then just track list and singles.  please do not delete it again when I had 5 sources.
 * You put a ton of unrelated info on there, but it's all from one source, a blog from bringthenoise.com, which is not a reliable source. There are primary sources linking to video singles and https://www.kerrang.com/features/bert-mccracken-and-the-future-of-the-used-we-recorded-26-or-27-songs-that-we-love/ doesn't actually even mention "heartwork" so I'm not sure what it's being used to source. The Apple Music source shows the song titles, but so does the blog and so does https://www.kerrang.com/the-news/the-used-have-announced-their-new-album-heartwork/.
 * None of it is gone, and it can all be restored when more reliable sources become available, but for now, there's not enough info to meet WP:NALBUM. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:19, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * the bring the noise site I just looked at quick and thought it was the big noise site which is the record label, my bad. but all the other sites are legit and you can go to their official site theused.net too and see it all. there is no reason for the page to not exist, that's still 4 reliable sources.  and plenty more by a simple google search so if your such a expert wikipediaer, instead of deleted my hours of work why don't you google it and add more sources and improve the page instead of removing it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rickybenz90 (talk • contribs) 06:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * While the other sites are "legit", they don't help the album to meet WP:NALBUM. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

No GNG has still not been met. All of the mentions are either passing or WP:ROUTINE. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:11, 24 February 2020 (UTC) then correct it instead of removing it so I don't have to report you for vandalizing the page. thanks.

February 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Heartwork (The Used album); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.''You are mistaken. I am not vandalizing the article, I am correctly apply guidelines.'' Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Nomination of Heartwork (The Used album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heartwork (The Used album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Heartwork (The Used album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:17, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Used, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Stop removing the primary source inline tags and this ends. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:46, 22 April 2020 (UTC)