User talk:Rickygrove/Antics

''Eric and Phil: Ah, I see you found the Infobox command. I was going to include that. I have a couple photos Ive captured from the desktop. will upload asap. I think the long section of features needs to be worked out as its too much like advertising. Perhaps only the most important aspects. probably should "bullet them" as well. Do we need to break out the Pro and Free packs as well? right now its in a paragraph style. Ill do some work on cleaning up references over the next few days and get rid of the ones that are redundant or not really needed. It was mostly an info cluster anyway that needed cleaning.. -Ricky may1 08''

''I added an image to the infobox that I think looks nice if everyone is ok with it. I agree that the long list of features could be condensed. I don't think we need to break out the pro and free more than you already have in the "Package Differences" section. I renamed it to "BasePack vs. ProPack" for clarity. I've added a Versions section at the bottom, although I'll have to get Brad or other Antics developers to fill in details before V2.5, as my time at Antics has been short thus far. I think we can use this to clarify the history of antics development. I got this idea from the article about Microsoft Word, which i think has a good structure for software articles. I think we should also draw from the MS Word article and separate the History section into categories (as I started by adding sections below) that more specifically outline the history of Antics development & changes made for each version. Again, I'll ask more tenured employees for feedback here. -Eric 6-May-2008''

''"Your input/changes are very good, Eric. Looks like we need to organize and insert the appropriate references, clean up the features list to include only major features and do a small addition, perhaps "Reviews?". I'll go ahead and work on that now. Phil is also helping as well." -Ricky 12 May 08''  Have removed the Versions History, added a "Reviews" section, am incorporating reference links and doing a slight bit of rewording. I think Phil is going to edit the lengthy "features" section" -Ricky 12 May08'''

- Moved here from main article page - Zsoverman (talk) 07:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

''I've essentially finished the article. Several small re-writes of text, went over every footnoted reference and trimmed down the external links section. My only concern now is that it might be fishy to include my own review as a source in the article (Renderosity.com) and is it too much to include Antics YouTube site?''

Rgrove (talk) 17:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I think it's ready to go. I made some minor adjustments to format, corrected a couple minor items. Sorry, those 13 May 2008 anonymous updates are me, I didn't realize I wasn't logged in til later. - Zsoverman (talk) 20:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)