User talk:Rickyrab

I appreciate your sense of humor
The story about the plungers on your front page was pretty funny and I wanted to tell you that I like how you just left it up there like that. (This is, in fact, my first edit of wikipedia. Random, I know.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.204.57.132 (talk) 15:53, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

April 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Karanacs (talk) 13:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Meetup
Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 01:39, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Judeo-Paganism
I'd like you to review my proposal on the article you wrote on Judeo-Paganism. I don't see any justification, or citation offered for that matter, for changing it to Jewitchery. The terms are hardly synonymous, and the editor's statement that Jewitchery is more common is both unsupported and irrelevant IMO; it's like saying an article on Judeo-Christianity should just be called Christianity, since Jews are the minority. I guess the same goes for the term African-American; just change it to American, since most Americans aren't of African descent. Rosencomet (talk) 18:51, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Bigfoot is fiction? You'll LOVE this:

 * http://www.lawnflowersjerkyandbigfoots.com/bigfootshootings.aspx Click on the blue links there. Some of the reports indicate that even police have shot at these things. Also check out the show Monster Quest tonight on the History Channel. A police officer, maybe a Sheriff's Deputy spots a Bigfoot and he shoots at it. Here in the US, especially where I'm at, people will shoot first, ask questions later - if the person, creature is still alive. 205.240.146.233 (talk) 19:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:4chan /b/ raid
Nope, it was 404 by the time I got your message. Just as well; I probably wouldn't even understand it! Another of life's great mysteries... ... disco spinster  talk  18:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed conversion of WikiProject Rutgers to a task force under WPNJ
I see you've contributed to WikiProject Rutgers, so I'm leaving this message for you as a courtesy. I've opened a discussion on the talk page of WikiProject Rutgers suggesting it be converted to a task force under WPNJ. Thank you!  shirulashem     (talk)   15:46, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Abraham Lincoln 1861 presidential inauguration
Adding a db tag keeps the redirect from working. If any page move needs to be done, it will be done by an admin, and there is no need for deleting the page so that you can move it. Ok? 199.125.109.126 (talk) 19:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Jews and Judaism
I understand the value of your edit, but many would argue that Judaism is a culture or civilization and not a (or not just a) religion. Not just Reconstructionist Jews, but many historians. Can you think of a way to achieve the effect you sought while also complying with NPOV? Slrubenstein  |  Talk 20:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Your opinion?
Do you have any opinion on this matter? Thanks.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Militarism-Socialism_in_Showa_Japan

--118.0.145.32 (talk) 16:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Valid point regarding the location of NR's death
But I think that opens a whole can of worms...the powers that be here seem to be adamant that death involved when the machines were turned off...TonyTiger386 (talk) 01:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Taoiseach
A reply to this. The "silly title" of Taoiseach is one of a number of everyday Irish language words used in the country even by the English language media, in general conversation, etc. Other examples might include Tánaiste (in effect a deputy Taoiseach), Garda Síochána (a term used to describe the country's police force) or Áras an Uachtaráin (the President's residence, which is exactly what it is). These terms do not necessarily have their own popular English language versions and so generally are translatable as practically the same. Taoiseach could roughly speaking be translated as "Chieftain" or "Leader" and is a term which was used in ancient Ireland to describe the ruler of an individual clan. It has survived to the present day to be made use of politically as it is now – to describe the leader of Ireland's head of government. Now I might just borrow that fancy media mention contraption of yours, having found some of my contributions being termed "fake" by Fox News yesterday... -- can  dle &bull; wicke  20:48, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

An article you !voted on in an AfD is up for deletion a second time
Please see: Articles for deletion/BVE Trainsim (2nd nomination) Ikip (talk) 00:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Pope Benedict XVI GAR notice
Pope Benedict XVI has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:43, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 40th century (Hebrew)
A tag has been placed on 40th century (Hebrew) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:26, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 20th century (Hebrew)
A tag has been placed on 20th century (Hebrew) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:28, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 30th century (Hebrew)
A tag has been placed on 30th century (Hebrew) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:28, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 29th century (Hebrew)
A tag has been placed on 29th century (Hebrew) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:29, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 39th century (Hebrew)
A tag has been placed on 39th century (Hebrew) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:29, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 10th century (Hebrew)
A tag has been placed on 10th century (Hebrew) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:30, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 7th century (Hebrew)
A tag has been placed on 7th century (Hebrew) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:33, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 17th century (Hebrew)
A tag has been placed on 17th century (Hebrew) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:33, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 37th century (Hebrew)
A tag has been placed on 37th century (Hebrew) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:33, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 47th century (Hebrew)
A tag has been placed on 47th century (Hebrew) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:33, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Jewish century articles
Hi, do you have any intention of adding content to the large number of articles you created at the beginning of August. The vast majority have remained devoid of content for a month. Is there any good reason why I should not nominate them for deletion? Jezhotwells (talk) 13:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I scrambled to add content to several of those articles after the deletion notices went up, but I have other work to do; nonetheless, I do intend to add content to the articles. Nonetheless, I think some articles deserve to be merged. &mdash;  Rickyrab | Talk 22:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 37th century (Hebrew)
I have nominated 37th century (Hebrew), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/37th century (Hebrew). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:51, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 30th century (Hebrew)
I have nominated 30th century (Hebrew), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/30th century (Hebrew). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * NB: The 31st, 32nd, 33rd, 34th, 35th, 36th, 38th and 39th century articles are also being discussed at the above. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:07, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Update - it is being suggested in the above discussion that the entire series from 1st to 60th century be merged into one article. I would suggest that you join the discussion. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Pennsylvania Railroad logo.jpg
File:Pennsylvania Railroad logo.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Pennsylvania Railroad logo.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:02, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Rickyrab/Tempsandbox
User:Rickyrab/Tempsandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rickyrab/Tempsandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Rickyrab/Tempsandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. &mdash; Rickyrab | Talk 04:33, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rickyrab/Tempsandbox
I have nominated Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rickyrab/Tempsandbox, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rickyrab/Tempsandbox. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. &mdash; Rickyrab | Talk 04:34, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rickyrab/Tempsandbox
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; Rickyrab | Talk 04:35, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rickyrab/Tempsandbox
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; Rickyrab | Talk 04:35, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jumping out of windows


The article Jumping out of windows has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 17:59, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Jumping out of windows
I have nominated Jumping out of windows, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jumping out of windows. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Orange Mike  |   Talk  22:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 44th century (Hebrew)
A tag has been placed on 44th century (Hebrew), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Abductive (reasoning) 08:09, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * See this for explanation of strikethrough. &mdash;  Rickyrab | Talk 07:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Park & Ride
http://www.driveless.com/pdfs/ParkAndRideGuide.pdf There ya go Mr. Vitale (talk) 03:14, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

File:2nd ave subway.svg
The MTA is merging the M and V lines, among other things. &mdash;  Rickyrab | Talk 15:48, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The idea is for the new line to run from far northern Brooklyn (and perhaps a small chunk of Queens) down the current "brown" tracks and use the Chrystie St. cut to switch over to the "orange" lines uptown, where it takes over the route of the V. This eliminates a link between Manhattan and Brooklyn (currently served by the M), but otherwise, all stations are still served by trains. The new line will have the color of the V and the letter of the M (yup, an orange M). &mdash;  Rickyrab | Talk 16:01, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi. Yes, I'm aware of the change. I will update the map when the change takes place.  Thanks. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 18:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅. Thanks. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 22:34, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello!
I have answered your question on my talk page. Wishes! -Sanskit (talk) 15:58, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Castle
I am against including the likes of Disneyland's castle in the article as it's simply not relevant. If you read the article, it explains the definition and later on details mock castles, follys, and artificial ruins. That is the influence of castles. That a theme park or two decided to built its own imitation castle is not relevant, and certainly does not belong in the lead. Nev1 (talk) 17:02, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Let's reverse it: why include Sleeping Beauty Castle at all? It's an example of a mock castle, but there are already several examples in the article. We can't list every single one, it simply wouldn't be practical. The ones currently used are the best architectural examples. You will also notice that aside from the images, specific castles are not mentioned in the lead. This is because it should be a summary of the article and detail general trends in the development of castles. Disneyland may call its structure a castle, but how does it fit the definition laid out in Castle, as supported by academic sources. Simply because someone decided it should be called a castle does not mean it is one. Mock castles and the like are mentioned not because they are castles, but because they were influenced by castle architecture. Nev1 (talk) 17:14, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 1st century (Hebrew) (2nd nomination)
An article that you have been involved in editing, 1st century (Hebrew) (2nd nomination), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. :| TelCo NaSp   Ve :|   18:29, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Autoblock

 * Then why am I still getting "View source"/autoblock" pages? &mdash;  Rickyrab | Talk 19:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

&mdash; Rickyrab | Talk 19:32, 26 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Looking at the list of autoblocks caused by the block of PM800, I would assume your university has multiple IP addresses which are dynamically assigned, thus whilst one autoblock is cleared you could find yourself under another when the IP changes. IP block exemption might be the thing to do here. --- Taelus  ( Talk ) 19:36, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

And yet another one.

IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. PhilKnight (talk) 21:17, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Khmelnitsky Uprising
You should be careful to avoid a popular POV apropos the subject. There is extensive historiographic literature on the subject listed in the citations, and it is recommended that you read op on these sources before inserting claims of "genocide" and astronomic casualties.--Galassi (talk) 14:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Also there are discussions thereof in the talk pages.--Galassi (talk) 14:31, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

An Invite to join the Highways WikiProject
JCbot (talk) 01:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Rutgers and BAKA
Hey I saw your post on nj.com. The event was a farce, they actually invited us on Thursday. All events required paid reservations. They planned barring us in advance. They instead held their event in a mostly empty hall and helped their cause. Saxophonemn (talk) 11:07, 31 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, what happened was when they saw us all in line, they figured to charge us knowing that we wouldn't want to give them money. It's not like they brought anyone that has a substantial wiki page that would be even worth a penny.  Then they made remarks, like don't let in anyone with a kippah on.  Fortunately for some of my buddies got in.  What made this disturbing was the how this was sort of orchestrated and denied us our rights to even do a walk out.  Though I planned to stay and ask questions, if they would have called on me. Saxophonemn (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Perennial water shortage in Nairobi Kenya; considering rain water harvest ting as a possible solution for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Perennial water shortage in Nairobi Kenya; considering rain water harvest ting as a possible solution is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Perennial water shortage in Nairobi Kenya; considering rain water harvest ting as a possible solution until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TransporterMan ( TALK ) 15:58, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Not quite sure why you were listed as the creator of that page, but I've withdrawn the nomination since you moved it while I was nominating it and it's been prodded. Regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 16:13, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Talk:World Trade Center
'Shouldn't the second complex on the site to bear the name get more attention than it has? '

I noticed the article is primarily about the old WTC rather than the one currently being built. Shouldn't we give some more weight to the new? While the old was likely more (in)famous, the new is also of interest. &mdash; Rickyrab | Talk 03:41, 16 June 2011 (UTC)"


 * Please see the current discussion at Talk:World Trade Center, would be good to get more input. Zarcadia (talk) 08:50, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

AFD of article you contributed to
Please see: Articles for deletion/List of new religious movements BigJim707 (talk) 11:35, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Flood myth
Thanks for your hard work there but I've reverted it as it appears to be original research (see WP:OR in that the sources don't seem to be discussing flood myths. Another minor point, see Before Present - you can't simply converted BP to CE or BCE dates. If you want to discuss this a bit more, would you please use the talk page of the article so that others can see the discussion? And I made the same sort of edits until someone kindly explained to me our policies. Dougweller (talk) 07:58, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Rumors about the September 11 attacks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rumors about the September 11 attacks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rumors about the September 11 attacks (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.--The Devil&#39;s Advocate (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,

the wub (talk) 18:18, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

November 2012
Thank you for your contribution&#32;to Star Wars sequel trilogy, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. Thank you. -Fnlayson (talk) 03:49, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

RfC:Infobox Road proposal
WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.


 * Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:HWY

Nbound (talk) 22:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

It was closed and archived...
...because it wasn't posted by Lucia Black, but by the impostor Lucia Block, who is presumably setting up a joe job on Lucia Black (I've since blocked the impostor). Please let it be. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 18:10, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification. No further questions. &mdash;  Rickyrab. Yada yada yada 18:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I nearly totally fell for it. I was in the process of replying but go edit conflicted by the close so didn't post. Good to know someone was on the ball. Blackmane (talk) 18:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of North American blizzards of 2010


The article North American blizzards of 2010 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Disambiguation page is just a rehash of the listed United States Blizzards template.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 00:05, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matchmaker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Ukraine
Regarding [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3APending_changes&diff=586917235&oldid=585679169 this edit], maybe we should call it Україна instead? :) davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  19:47, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Roller coaster, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 15:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Caribbean winter 2008 2009 2 998.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:55, 14 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Caribbean winter 2008 2009 1 209.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:56, 14 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Caribbean winter 2008 2009 2 674.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:58, 14 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Caribbean winter 2008 2009 2 648.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:00, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Rutgers
As a member of WikiProject Rutgers, I wanted to make you aware of this discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Universities#Rutgers_University.2C_Rutgers_New_Brunswick.2C_Rutgers_Camden.2C_Rutgers_Newark

Joe Ratzinger listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Joe Ratzinger. Since you had some involvement with the Joe Ratzinger redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. The Theosophist (talk) 10:07, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Cañón de Santa Elena
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cañón de Santa Elena, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.esacademic.com/dic.nsf/eswiki/101932.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:39, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Cañón de Santa Elena
See WP:ATTSIT on how to attribute another Wikipedia site. Bgwhite (talk) 01:13, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. &mdash; Rickyrab. Yada yada yada 01:38, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Cañón de Santa Elena
 * added links pointing to BC, Palm, Feline, Chihuahua, Depression, Lift, Peregrine, Sierra, Reed, This, Archaic, Morita and Mariola

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Reply
It's been a long day for me. I just didn't feel up to explaining to the IP why acting like a dumbass is naughty. Rusted AutoParts 01:17, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Trenton
Hi there, we (code for trenton http://codefortrenton.org/) are working on documenting mercer county, trenton nj for WLM and other tasks, wanted to say "hi" James Michael DuPont (talk) 12:17, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi back to ya. &mdash;  Rickyrab. Yada yada yada 05:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC) :)

Nomination of Coffee Party USA for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coffee Party USA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Coffee Party USA until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Swil999 (talk) 20:20, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Monroe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monroe Township, New Jersey ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/James_Monroe check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/James_Monroe?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Shopping malls established in 1917


A tag has been placed on Category:Shopping malls established in 1917 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)