User talk:RideABicycle/Archives/2007/May

CR FAC
I wasn't saying you were wrong. What I said was that I was concerned of the large amount of "supports" that don't address the two citation tags in the article. That isn't "skewed" to think that people should address citation tags in an FAC. FA articles should not have citation tags within them. They are supposed to be the best articles, and ones with citations tags are not the best. These tags were there in the first FAC run, and when they get ignored it makes me think that people are not thoroughly reading the article. I would think that people would at least address the tags in their support. So, again, I wasn't calling you wrong, because it's your opinion that it's "Its a very well done piece," but when everyone that supports the article doesn't address the tags in it, it makes me worry we are pushing film articles through FACs just to have more films reach that status.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  01:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)