User talk:Rider4151

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Stumpf has been accepted
 Anthony Stumpf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  20:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Otis (businessman) has been accepted
 Charles Otis (businessman), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  17:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

July 2018
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment, or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button Signature icon april 2018.png located above the edit window.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:34, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Keegan Theatre ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Keegan_Theatre check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Keegan_Theatre?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to American Buffalo, Laurence O'Keefe, Hands on a Hardbody and The Reluctant Dragon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Susan Marie Rhea moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Susan Marie Rhea, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AmericanAir88 (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Keegan Theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fool for Love ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Keegan_Theatre check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Keegan_Theatre?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Are you a paid editor with a conflict of interest?
Hello Rider4151. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rider4151. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

No, not a paid editor (reponse to previous email
No, I am not a paid editor. I'm currently doing a lot of editing about Washington,DC-area theaters completely as a labor of love. I am very interested in the theater scene and would like to collect information about it. The Keegan Theatre and Adventure Theatre, which I've doing editing about recently, are both important niche theaters that have been widely recognized for their artistry.

Deletion discussion about Mark Rhea
Hello, Rider4151,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mark Rhea should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Mark Rhea.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Striker force Talk 16:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Strikerforce, you encouraged me to "continue improving the article," but them promptly undid my edits. I'm a little confused. The decision that my changes were not relevant seems quite subjective.

Draft:Susan Marie Rhea


Hello, Rider4151. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Susan Marie Rhea.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 07:03, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eugene Ludwig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Eugene_Ludwig check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Eugene_Ludwig?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rider4151/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Rider4151/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://lifeboat.com/ex/bios.dina.ellis.rochkind. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 15:57, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

I am not sure how to respond to this. The information is backwards. I created the Dina Ellis Rochkind wikipedia page in July 2018. That page was then used by Lifeboat; there is no infringement, as the Lifeboat content is a COPY of the Wikipedia content. I have no objection to having a "sandbox" page deleted, since the bio is already live and has been for some time. Rider4151 (talk) 17:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)Rider4151

Nomination of Dina Ellis Rochkind for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dina Ellis Rochkind is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dina Ellis Rochkind until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. William Graham talk 04:45, 2 December 2022 (UTC)