User talk:Ridland

I thought sepp blatter resigned already; it should be updated

May 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:43, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 was changed by Ridland (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871482 on 2015-05-11T11:43:07+00:00.

The article Fingal Independent has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organized event, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:39, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dublin Bus Route 42
Hello Ridland,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dublin Bus Route 42 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lucky102 (talk) 10:28, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions.

Total Exposure
I am redirecting the page back again; I don't feel the show was Notable enough to have its own article. 80.111.218.7 (talk) 00:14, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2015 Dublin Airport collision


The article 2015 Dublin Airport collision has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Clearly not notable or of any encyclopedic importance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 16:44, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Deleted articles
If you believe that the previous decisions to redirect the Ryanair Flight 296 and KLM Flight 1673 articles then please raise it at Deletion review, please do not keep removing the redirects unless you gain a new consensus, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 17:24, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 2015 Dublin Airport collision for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Dublin Airport collision is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2015 Dublin Airport collision until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MilborneOne (talk) 17:47, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Comment
May I just say, I am totally sorry for my actions. I just like editing Wikipedia. I hate when I am blocked. The thing I hate most is the block time. No expiry yet. Can you please tell me when I am going to edit Wikipedia again? And also may I say the crass language "Bullshit" on my previous block notice did it for me. I really want to edit again and won't make mistakes. Thanks--Ridland (talk) 16:18, 5 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Sockpuppets typically don't get unblocked. You should probably request an unblock from your original account and quit using/making sockpuppet accounts. Also you need to be more specific than "sorry for my actions" and "won't make mistakes", you need to make it very obvious that you understand what exactly you did wrong and that it won't happen again. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 17:13, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks.--Ridland (talk) 18:47, 5 July 2015 (UTC)