User talk:Rifleman 82


 * User talk:Rifleman 82/Archive 1 (End Oct 2006)
 * User talk:Rifleman 82/Archive 2 (End Dec 2006)
 * User talk:Rifleman 82/Archive 3 (End Feb 2007)
 * User talk:Rifleman 82/Archive 4 (End Oct 2007)
 * User talk:Rifleman 82/Archive 5 (End Jan 2008)
 * User talk:Rifleman 82/Archive 6 (End Apr 2008)
 * User talk:Rifleman 82/Archive 7 (End Nov 2008)
 * User talk:Rifleman 82/Archive 8 (End Jun 2009)
 * User talk:Rifleman 82/Archive 9 (End Nov 2010)
 * User talk:Rifleman 82/Archive 10 (End Apr 2011)
 * User talk:Rifleman 82/Archive 11 (End Dec 2012)
 * User talk:Rifleman 82/Archive 12 (End Dec 2017)

Texas A&M University medal
Hi - thank you for leaving a note on the page of new editor,. He just came to the Teahouse to ask about how best to support his edit. As you'll see, I explained it could well be reverted until evidence is forthcoming. I believe this was a genuine edit, but it's well outside my experience to support - any help you could offer him would, I'm sure, be much appreciated. See Teahouse thread at Teahouse. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 21:36, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Help
please confirm whether Bromopentacarbonylrhenium(I) compound is a inorganic compound or organic compound. Because the lead of the article describes it as a inorganic compound. but at the end it is categorised as a organorhenium compound.--கி.மூர்த்தி (talk) 02:25, 2 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Organometallic compounds are inorganic compounds by definition because they contain a metal. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 10:52, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular
   

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:52, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Officer Cadet School (Singapore)


The article Officer Cadet School (Singapore) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Tagged as unsourced for 8 years, tons of content. Fails WP:V."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waggie (talk) 04:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Gran Via, Madrid.jpg


The file File:Gran Via, Madrid.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "orphaned image, no encyclopedic use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

"Ozonator" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ozonator. Since you had some involvement with the Ozonator redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:44, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

File:RSN Org Chart.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RSN Org Chart.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Seloloving (talk) 17:10, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

"Ferrocenium" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ferrocenium. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 13 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 16:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Given that you have resigned as an admin, feel free to let me know if there are any user rights that could help you with whatever work you need. Happy to assign whatever I can given this wasn't "under a cloud" or anything of the sort. Just ping me whenever. -- The SandDoctor  Talk 07:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Resign as administrator
Hi there

I don't spend much time here anymore. I'd like to resign as administrator. Thanks.

--Rifleman 82 (talk) 02:23, 20 December 2021 (UTC)


 * That's been done for you Rifleman 82. Thank you for your service to the community as an admin, and thank you for the community-spirited self-request for removal of the tools. SilkTork (talk) 04:39, 20 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I was just thinking the other day about chemistry contributors I hadn't seen in a while. Hopefully you're doing well in whatever else you are doing! DMacks (talk) 05:36, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for both your previous work and your self-request. —valereee (talk) 20:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your service to the project, Rifleman. It is greatly appreciated and your work lives on. Hopefully we see you around again, but, regardless, I do wish you all the best. Happy holidays,  The SandDoctor  Talk 07:52, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Hazchem F+
Template:Hazchem F+ has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:52, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dimethyl ether (data page)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dimethyl ether (data page) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Alkylated naphthalene
Hello, Rifleman 82,

Thank you for creating Alkylated naphthalene.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Books or academic papers should be good as reliable sources"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Rifleman 82. Thank you for your work on Aldol reactions. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 Onel 5969  TT me 09:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Seem duplicative... --Rifleman 82 (talk) 04:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Biodiesel by region for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Biodiesel by region is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Biodiesel by region until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:31, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Potassium borohydride


A tag has been placed on Potassium borohydride requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"to make way for new draft article"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 19:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

"Clinistrip" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Clinistrip&redirect=no Clinistrip] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. 𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 11:48, 21 March 2024 (UTC)