User talk:Rigastev

Haplogroup R1b (Y-DNA)
Hey... some of what you're doing here makes sense -- removing uncited stuff. However, you are adding some POV to the article, specifiically,
 * "All of this is, of course, speculative. It is sobering to recall that haplotype diversity indicates too young an age for R1b1c to have been in Europe prior to the last Ice Age. One must argue for "genetic bottlenecks", "founder effects" and "drift" to fudge R1b1c to the proper age to have been "Cro-Magnon"."

or,
 * "perhaps as uncertain as the Cro-Magnon hypothesis."

among other things. I don't want to screw you up editing, so you should probably refactor those parts and others to a more NPOV state, ok? Thanks! Gscshoyru 15:49, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

It's good to use the talk pages
You have been making some pretty aggressive edits there. To keep people onside with what you're doing, can I suggest that, urgently, on the talk page you set out what you have removed from the article, and explain why. Otherwise, if people see wholescale removals, they are apt to revert wholescale. So tell people why you've been cutting out what you've been cutting out, and try to bring them along with you or at least feel they can discuss it with you, if they don't agree.

Note that Wikipedia has a very firm policy of WP:NPOV - Neutral Point of View. If there are different views on a point, Wikipedia tries very hard to give an even handed presentation of all sides.

Just some friendly advice, a word to the wise, because it looks like it may be some of your first editing here. Jheald 17:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)