User talk:Right.editsgold

September 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to St. Mary's Jacobite Syrian Cathedral, Manarcad, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. { $\mathbb{JPG}$ } 10:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Edits without any citations or discussions
Regret to say all most all your edits are not appears to be constructive. I tried to correct those but you reverted all those changes. Your edits in the article Valiyapally is just an example of such actions. Please refrain from these destructive actions. Add citation for making changes next time or use article talk page to discuss with other users - John C. (talk) 11:20, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Valiyapally
Please use the talk page of this article Talk:Valiyapally for any further change in this article. Thanks -John C. (talk) 11:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

'Orthodox Syrian' to 'Syrian Orthodox
Noticed that you are changing the name 'Orthodox Syrian' to 'Syrian Orthodox in multiple wiki articles. Please use articles talk page to explain for the reason for this change - John C. (talk) 11:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Kandanad Church
Kandanad Church is now administered by Makankara Orthodox Syrian Church. You can read this here : https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kochi/after-45-years-orthodox-faction-celebrates-mass-in-kandanad/articleshow/71251426.cms. Don't change the name "Orthodox Syrian" to "Syrian Orthodox". Please refrain from destructive edits in this page and other wiki pages. If you need any futher info let me know - John C. (talk) 13:06, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

==

October 2020
Your recent editing history at St. Mary's Orthodox Syrian Cathedral, Piravom shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''Actually, you have reverted enough times, but you were never warned. Any new revert will result in a report.'' (CC) Tb hotch ™ 16:45, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

@User:Tbhotch, Dear admin, please note this user (user:Right.editsgold) continues his disruptive editing like distortion of data, deletion of references in other articles  also. Please see his recent edits in the article St.Thomas Orthodox Syrian Cathedral, Mulanthuruthy -John C. (talk) 14:09, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * You can fill a report at WP:ANI. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 18:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

@User:Tbhotch, Thank you. As suggested posted a complaint in Admin's notice board -John C. (talk) 00:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. (CC) Tb hotch ™ 00:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

@User:Right.editsgold, use talk page of the article if you are interested in discussions. You can not continue the disruptive editing as you are currently doing. Putting something in edit summary alone will not suffice - John C. (talk) 17:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I'm WhoAteMyButter. I noticed that you recently removed content from St. Thomas Orthodox Syrian Cathedral, Mulanthuruthy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   WhoAteMyButter ( 📬 │ ✏️ ) 04:56, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

@user: Right.editsgold, Use Talk:St. Thomas Orthodox Syrian Cathedral, Mulanthuruthy and reach consensus there. Refrain from edit warring — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnchacks (talk • contribs) 04:32, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on St. Thomas Orthodox Syrian Cathedral, Mulanthuruthy; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 07:04, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 07:13, 13 December 2020 (UTC) i have given the citation and the references to the topic and about the bishop and still if you consider it wrong then either you are being baised or you being mislead. if you can check the contribs of johnchacks you can see how the user has constantly deleted topics related to the syrian othodox churches from numerous pages and added misleading contents and added fake history to information, this can lead to legal complications.


 * Editors who threaten legal action to get their way may not edit Wikipedia - if this persists, your block will be extended to indefinite.  Acroterion   (talk)   21:15, 13 December 2020 (UTC) I told these can lead to legal complications by others, hope you can understand . I am a member of this church were you have blocked me from editing misleading edits by other misusers . I dont understand why you have done this to someone who is a part of the church . You legit paved way for miscreants to write utter nonsense about my church.
 * Nevertheless, such intimidation by reference to legal processes is forbidden on Wikipedia, as it makes it impossible for anyone to discern the facts, and brings civil discussion to a halt. Please provide reliable sources so everybody can see the basis for you edits rather than simply asserting that you're right. That is essential on Wikipedia, since it helps those who come here to find a deeper understanding than an encyclopedia article can provide. When your block expires, use the talkpages to present sources that back up your edits - that's what talkpages are there for. Convince people.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:58, 15 December 2020 (UTC) I provided everything with sources and references, kindly check up before pounding on me like this. You have been misguided . I have only added more details from my church history books which are available only in our native language. I've just told more about our church's past and the possessions that are present in the church. Kindly remove this block proceedings
 * And it is essential that you use the talkpages as requested to find consensus for the sources you're using and the edits resulting from them. You may not edit-war for inclusion, and you are expected to participate in discussions with other editors, rather than repeatedly reverting and mentioning legal consequences. Edit-warring is a bright-line policy violation.  Acroterion   (talk)   16:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC) Come on, did you even go thru the edit history page where i clearly mentions the changes I've made with the complete citations .The other guy user Johnchacks literally wrote that gregorius bishop was from the malankara indian orthodox church when that didnt even exist in 18th century and was formed only in 1934. i just wrote he was raised as a bishop under the syrian Orthodox church by the patriarch and he kept on reverting .Is this the outcome of defending truth on wiki?, where you ban me and the misuser is free editing and misleading ?
 * You may not edit-war, and more than one editor took issue with your edits. That's why it's important to use the talkpage to discuss your edits, not to make legal-sounding threats while simply going back to your preferred version. It's not a negotiable policy.  Acroterion   (talk)   16:53, 15 December 2020 (UTC) thats because Johnchacks reported me twice and i explained to elizium and elizium understood . I dont understand why you cant understand and differentiate the truth instead of defending the misuser like this. Johnchack is on a rampage ruining and misleading with infos . Its high time you stop this

File permission problem with File:Letter from marthoma head regarding the feud.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Letter from marthoma head regarding the feud.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:54, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Christianity in India, you may be blocked from editing. tgeorgescu (talk) 19:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)