User talk:RightCowLeftCoast/Archive 8

Bahamut0013
Hello RightCowLeftCoast, we both participated in a conversation on the USA article (about whether the American Revolution was the only war of independence against Britain) which led me to your profile. Totally unrelated to that conversation, I saw a memorial banner on your page to Bahamut0013. The name sounded familiar, and when I visited his user page I saw that he was a Final Fantasy fan. Now I remember that we were actually members of the same Final Fantasy group about ten years ago. We spoke a few times via message board and PM about his love of Final Fantasy and the Marines. Only knew him online for a couple months, but I remember him being a really genuine guy. We hadn't spoken since and I had no idea he was an admin on Wikipedia. I'm shocked and incredibly sad to learn about his passing. I wanted to give my condolences and wasn't really sure how to do that other than on your talk page. TempDog123 (talk) 08:47, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William D. Swenson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

California
Hi, could you please explain your recent revert of my edit to California. Manhatten is clearly a spelling error as you may easily confirm by looking at the relevant web link given which you can see here. After you have looked, perhaps you would consider reverting your revert. Jodosma (talk) 18:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I think that was an error. I have reverted myself.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:00, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Jodosma (talk) 19:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Southern Strategy neutrality dispute.
I wanted to let you know I have added additional references to the neutrality dispute. [] Thanks! Sorry, it appears, perhaps by design this neutrality case is going no where. I do not know who Scoobydunk is but base on a long history of warnings and his/her behavior in the discussion it appears the intent is simply to cause things to crash. I prose that we leave the dispute open for the time until I get a chance to make a few edits. Thanks. - Getoverpops (sorry, I misplaced my log in) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.205.228.188 (talk) 05:21, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Tuna industry
I think we have that section in great shape. But I was wondering: is the "Yippie Fleet" during WW II mentioned in any other articles? I certainly think they deserve to have their here story somewhere, either in a military article or a merchant marine article. But I'm not familiar enough with our coverage of WW II to know where to look. Any thoughts? --MelanieN (talk) 00:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Not significantly from what I have seen, there is mention of it in Yard patrol boat, but it is not as well cited or as well developed as the section in History of San Diego. However, I did include some information in the article Japanese American.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:58, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Good, that Yard Patrol article looks like the place to put it, all right. That's why they were called the Yippie Fleet, right? Because their boats were designated YP? --MelanieN (talk) 02:16, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes. Yes.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Japanese American, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Los Angeles Harbor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

American Politics 2 arbitration evidence phase closing soon
As a listed party to this case, this is a notification that the evidence phase of this case is closing soon on 14 April. If you have additional evidence that you wish to introduce for consideration, it must be entered before this date. On behalf of the committee, Lankiveil (speak to me) 02:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC).

Evidence closed
The evidence phase is now closed on the American Politics 2 arbitration case, which you are a named party to. You are welcome to add proposals at the workshop. For the Committee, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply ) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Climate change in California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sierra Nevada. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Help Desk
Thanks for your ping at the Help Desk, but I am unable to get involved with whatever this dispute may be. I am going to have very limited computer access for the next few weeks. Besides, as someone pointed out, the Help Desk is not the place for this kind of issue. --MelanieN (talk) 23:48, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Hillary Rodham Clinton
Thanks for your consideration, and please note that joining this project is in no way an endorsement of HRC or her political positions. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:04, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

American politics 2 workshop phrase
Hello RightCowLeftCoast, the workshop phase on the American politics 2 arbitration case, which you are listed as a party to, has been extended to 24 April 2015. This is the best opportunity to express your analysis of the evidence presented in this arbitration case. For the Committee, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply ) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

American politics 2 workshop phase closed
The workshop phase of the American politics 2 arbitration case, which you are listed as a party to, is now closed. For the Arbitration Committee, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply ) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Resurrection of Southern California Task Force
After moving from Los Angeles County to Kern County to San Luis Obispo County, I am finally realizing that there is life in California outside of L.A. and San Francisco, where I lived and grew up. Oh, I have also lived in San Diego, San Bernardino, San Joaquin, Yolo and Sacramento counties, and I earned my undergraduate degree in Riverside County. I am trying to breathe life into the Southern California Task Force, and I hope you will join me. Could you visit our list of participants at the other end of this link and update your description of what you are interested in doing for us, assuming that you still want to be in the mix, that is.

In recompense, I will buy you a drink during the Wikipedia Welcome Week I am planning for Morro Bay on the Central Coast in July. Yours sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 18:45, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Italian American Article
I am somewhat perplexed concerning the flag you raised in the Culture section of the Italian American article. This quite long section already has 40 references. It would be helpful if you used "reference needed"  flags as appropriate in this section, or let me know on my Talk page what you consider the general shortcomings to be. Philantonia (talk) 14:20, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * There are whole paragraphs and sentences lacking reliable source references, thus the tag. Thus IMHO it was an appropriate use of the tag. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, therefore seeing an issue but not having the time at that moment to fix the issue that I saw, I left a tag.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:51, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I am still quite baffled that someone who has never contributed to the article can make a snap judgment that a major section is "lacking in reliable source references" (when, in fact, there are 40 references incorporated). I think it is incumbent upon you to either be more precise with one or more "citation needed' flags, or remove your tag.  Yes, its true anyone can edit an article, but the highest standards of Wikipedia editing should always prevail. Philantonia (talk) 20:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Blah, blah, blah. Stop pestering me. I saw sentences and whole paragraphs missing references. If Philantonia feels that those not normally editing the article shouldn't be noting issues, there is page protection which could be applied for. I don't understand the mountain created out of this mole hill. Either improve the section and remove the tag. Or remove the tag and leave those mulititude of sentences and paragraph subject to possible challenge. I don't care, enough about the subject to continue this convo.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Entries like: "Italian American culture, and transplanted Italian culture, have influenced American culture in a variety of ways, such as: Italian restaurants, foods, coffees and desserts; wine production (in California and elsewhere in the U.S.) and consumption; popular music, starting in the 1940s and 1950s, and continuing into the present; operatic, classical and instrumental music; fashion and design; "Capra-esque" movies (in the style of Frank Capra); Italianate architecture, in homes, churches, and public buildings; Montessori schools; Christmas crèches; fireworks displays; bocce; Columbus Day parades; and the commemoration of Columbus, as reflected in numerous monuments, city names, names of institutions and the poetic name, "Columbia", for the United States itself." are based on a generally recognized part of American culture, and do not require documented proof (however, I will where possible make links to other Wikipedia articles).  In other cases, the statement is only an extension of what has been discussed previously in the article.  Finally, your response to a legitimately (and politely posed concern on my part) is inconsistent with the highest standard of Wikipedia protocol Philantonia (talk) 22:27, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * LoL, unexplained re-addition of non-verified non-sourced content is high standards. LoL. Stop trolling me.
 * If that was an IP editing I would consider that vandalism. LoL.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Half Million Award
Thank you for bringing such an important article up to snuff. Bobnorwal (talk) 12:53, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Uber regulation summary: help needed
Hi RightCowLeftCoast, I'm reaching out to each of the editors who commented on the "Request for Comment" at Talk:Uber (company) re: the Uber article's section on regulation and legal issues. As you might remember, editors were overwhelmingly in favor of splitting off that information into a new article, then summarizing in the Uber article. While the first part happened, there has been no movement on the summarizing and Regulatory opposition continues to grow and grow. To help kickstart that process, I've put forward a draft for everyone to take a look at that aims to cover the key details in a summary form: Summarizing Regulatory opposition

My conflict of interest means that it's best for me not to be bold and move this into the article myself, but I hope that it can at least be a starting point for other editors to work from. Would you mind coming back to the page to have a look? Craig at Uber (talk) 19:52, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Tdeas for a Nomination
''While "Editor named after a city"'s editing count has been low recently, he has been a fair-minded and quality editor for many years. With 80% article-space editing among his 6000 edits, his ability to edit fairly in the challenging arena of Real World Global politics is commendable. His main interest was the article History of Israel. He edited with an understanding of mutual editorial recognition and the collaboration of equals. He was willing to discuss contentious material which was constantly at issue. His own statement, "(my) edits are made in good faith and are not out of a desire to sell political points." is a clear indication of his awareness that WP is a place for mutual resolution.''

This is just a rough draft, an example. Make changes if you like. loooking froward to your nomination. . Buster Seven   Talk  17:58, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to comment on VP proposal: Establish WT:MoS as the official site for style Q&A on Wikipedia
You are being contacted because of your participation in the proposal to create a style noticeboard. An alternate solution, the full or partial endorsement of the style Q&A currently performed at WT:MoS, is now under discussion at the Village Pump. Darkfrog24 (talk) 21:25, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Meetup
Hi - appreciate the invite, but I'm out of town now. Hope it's a fun time! Dohn joe (talk) 14:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

American politics 2 arbitration proposed decision posted
Hello. The proposed decision for the American politics 2 arbitration case, which you are listed to as a party, has been posted. Thank you, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply ) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for 2014 Ninoy Aquino International Airport bombing plot
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:57, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for South Bay Salt Works
Thanks for this article Victuallers (talk) 07:47, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Invitation
You're invited to the discussion at []. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:44, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2 closed
This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted: For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply ) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:41, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Remedy 1 of the American Politics case is rescinded. In its place, the following is adopted: standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
 * 2) is banned from any page relating to or making any edit about post-1932 politics of the United States, and closely related people, in any namespace. This ban may be appealed no earlier than 18 months after its adoption.
 * 3) is admonished for adding to the hostility in the topic area.
 * Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard

Would you please take a look
Would you please take a look at the edits and related talk sections I've been working on for this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_strategy#Evolution The section in particular is one regarding Reagan and a campaign speech in 1980. The article contains references to those who claim the speech was proof of racism yet when I try to add references that suggest otherwise they are reverted by a pair of editors. What frustrates me is they are not justifying the reverts in the talk page. I'm basically looking for an outside opinion on my Talk page arguments and the edits. I feel that the editors are simply protecting the current tone of the article regardless of the facts presented. Thanks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Southern_strategy#Opinion_Pieces Getoverpops (talk) 00:05, 18 June 2015 (UTC) Could you help me with one other issue? I realized some of my footnotes were done incorrectly. I wanted to avoid the long quotes that support my references so I tried to embed the text in the reference. This isn't correct but I'm trying to figure out how to make my references in context with your combined references. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Footnotes#Footnotes:_embedding_references ThanksGetoverpops (talk) 02:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Try looking at Template:Cite book. Enter the text in "|laysummary=" along with "|laydate=". This way the book can be linked to, and the summary can be kept.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 03:42, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

I wanted to thank you for the inputs on the Southern Strategy page. Sadly I think my combination of enthusiasm and novice understanding of the rules will be called edit waring by a few posters, in particular as a way to guard the current slant of the article. Anyway, I will probably be told that I'm no longer welcome on that topic. A pity as I think the topic needs work and your posts were finally offering a bit of balance. Either way, if this is how things shake up, thank you for the help. Getoverpops (talk) 04:16, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Montsec, Meuse
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:35, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Montsec, Meuse
Thank you for noticing my edits on Montsec, Meuse! It was my pleasure to hopefully improve it some. Of course the author of the article User:Dr. Blofeld is a wonderful editor so I was honored to work on his article. He likely hadn't had the time just yet to enhance it beyond the start-up stage. Cheers, and hope you're doing well. --Wapiti (talk) 16:27, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Excellent work, and thanks! Yes, given that I started a good 10,000 odd of the French communes which were entirely missing I'm afraid they were created as sub stubs. It is always great to see editors expanding them, hope you continue to do so!♦ Dr. Blofeld  16:33, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Demographics of Filipino Americans
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Demographics of Filipino Americans you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 01:21, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Phil's BBQ
Hello, I added Phil's BBQ as you suggested. Can you take a look over it? It just got flagged as advert. Regards @Rob talk 03:16, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * it appears to be well sourced, there are a few typos, but nothing that cannot be fixed. IMHO it does not appear to be intentionally written as an advert. Perhaps taking it to the Copy editors guild might help if the goal is to elevate the article to GA status.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:42, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Demographics of Filipino Americans
The article Demographics of Filipino Americans you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Demographics of Filipino Americans for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 08:21, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * please bare with me, due to San Diego Comic Convention coming up and work, I will be occupied largely by real life. When time becomes available, I will dedicate myself to addressing the suggested improvements to the article.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:40, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * That's fine. Would you like the hold period extended or do you think your life will slow down within the 7 days? I've got no problem extending it if you need it. Wugapodes (talk) 17:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for being. I have begun implementing some of the changes requested in GA1; however, it will take some time implementing the 20+ changes. Also, after tomorrow I won't be able to garuntee time to dedicate to Wikipedia until at least 14 July, there please extens to me a grace period until 21 July. This is a large article, with a significant number of prose changes requested. Thanks.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:19, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ Wugapodes (talk) 21:59, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of South Bay Salt Works
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article South Bay Salt Works you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CorporateM -- CorporateM (talk) 23:40, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

It's only fair to notify you...
..that just today Ellen has directly addressed you on the United States talk page...,, requesting comment from you, and that on that same "inequality" topic there is currently an RFC she started. I'll add that I hope you haven't recently decided to abandon that or the Conservativism in the US article. Both have and would benefit from your continued involvement. VictorD7 (talk) 18:06, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Persons who write Tagalog who may write articles on school districts in Canada and the USA?
RightCowLeftCoast,

Do you know any Wikipedians who write Tagalog and who are interested in writing Tagalog articles on Canadian school districts? The Vancouver School Board, Peel District School Board, and Toronto District School Board have posted documents in Tagalog, and the San Francisco Unified School District also has documents in Tagalog. I think it would be beneficial to have Tagalog-language articles on these school districts on the Tagalog Wikipedia.

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 18:30, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

South Bay Salt Works
Wanted to make sure you saw that I picked up the review for your GA nomination. CorporateM (Talk) 03:40, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

DYK for 2015 Baltimore protests
Materialscientist (talk) 01:21, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Demographics of Filipino Americans
The article Demographics of Filipino Americans you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Demographics of Filipino Americans for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 01:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of South Bay Salt Works
The article South Bay Salt Works you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:South Bay Salt Works for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CorporateM -- CorporateM (talk) 17:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rafael Peralta
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rafael Peralta you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 12:20, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of South Bay Salt Works
The article South Bay Salt Works you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:South Bay Salt Works for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CorporateM -- CorporateM (talk) 04:41, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't panic, RCLC, I suspect this is a bot error. The GA bot does a lot of weird things. Did you really fail this nomination? It sure doesn't look like it at the evaluation, where you just point out some minor fixes. --MelanieN (talk) 14:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The GA nomination was abandoned. In the scope of things, I usually maintain a pretty high standard in what meets GA. I'd be happy to pick it up again if/when he/she comes back to complete the review. CorporateM (Talk) 15:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * OIC. That explains it. And yes, you are supposed to maintain a high standard for GAs. Thanks for doing the reviewing. MelanieN alt (talk) 01:23, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Xiong Yan (dissident)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Xiong Yan (dissident) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 16:40, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much!
Thanks for nominating me for editor of the week. I am very proud of the award and touched to know that people recognize my efforts. Best wishes!

Jonathan Telaviv1 (talk) 17:16, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rafael Peralta
The article Rafael Peralta you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Rafael Peralta for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 18:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Xiong Yan (dissident)
The article Xiong Yan (dissident) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Xiong Yan (dissident) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tomandjerry211 (alt) -- Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 18:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

This Thursday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Getty Center
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Getty Center in LA on October 15! (drop-in any time, 10am-4pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXV, October 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Christina Marie Williams
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Christina Marie Williams you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gourami Watcher -- Gourami Watcher (talk) 04:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)