User talk:RightGot

Vera Van Wagner listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vera Van Wagner. Since you had some involvement with the Vera Van Wagner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. WWGB (talk) 05:03, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Oldest in Britain
Is there any reason it isn't considered a reliable source? Has there ever been an incident where it gave information that was inaccurate?

9:00 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 9:00. Since you had some involvement with the 9:00 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:23, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Kane Tanaka for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kane Tanaka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kane Tanaka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 18:26, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review for Kane Tanaka
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Kane Tanaka. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 100.40.125.198 (talk) 20:42, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Edits like this and this are a nuisance and a waste of time for other editors. Would you care to justify them? DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 23:59, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Maria Giuseppa Robucci for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria Giuseppa Robucci is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Maria Giuseppa Robucci until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 23:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)